Talk:Female condom: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 23:03, 4 August 2011

Medicine: Reproductive B‑class Mid‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Reproductive medicine task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

How do I use it?

This article lacks any history, and seems to discuss none of the negative aspects.

How do I use it?

You guys (yes, you!) should add a section explaining how to use it. I don't have a clue of how to use that bag. Maybe no one has...—Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.79.33.145 (talk) 20:57, 20 November 2007

The smaller ring is inserted into the vagina. The larger ring prevents the entire device from slipping inside. That might be able to be worked into the article, but Wikipedia is not a how-to guide. Lyrl^Talk _C 23:56, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Shouldn't it have all of the significant information about something? I think how to use it is very significant when it comes to condoms. The male condom version even has this little drawning showing how to use it. Why is female condom lacking it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.79.33.145 (talk) 21:41, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I thought this was originally developed for gay male anal sex. Does anyone know for sure and have information on this topic? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.222.93.76 (talk) 02:12, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Where do I get it?

Say I'd like to try out the latex version of the female condom. Is there any place at all in Europe to get it from? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.221.155.29 (talk) 17:26, 5 June 2008 (UTC) the blow job part of florence. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.36.217.102 (talk) 04:27, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

FC?

I have no idea what this FC1, FC2 is, or why it appears to be taken for granted in several sections. If this is a brand, the article should be revised to be brand-neutral.rubah (talk) 06:06, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

cissexist

I feel like the massive cissexism of the name "female condom" should be addressed in the article. A) not everyone with a vagina is female; B) people use it anally; C) it promotes the idea that women must be receptive/bottoms/be penetrated in order to have sex.

I know many people who would much prefer that it be renamed the "receptive condom"