Plan of Attack: Difference between revisions
m Robot - Speedily moving category Books about the War on Terror to Category:War on Terror books per CFDS. |
m copyedit, MOS, and/or AWB general fixes using AWB |
||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
| followed_by = [[State of Denial: Bush at War, Part III]] |
| followed_by = [[State of Denial: Bush at War, Part III]] |
||
}} |
}} |
||
'''''Plan of Attack''''' is a |
'''''Plan of Attack''''' is a 2004 book by the well known [[United States|US]] [[author]] and [[investigative reporter]] [[Bob Woodward]]. It was promoted as "a behind-the-scenes account of how and why [[George W. Bush|President [George W.] Bush]] decided to go to war against [[Iraq]]" <ref>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A19691-2004Apr17.html?g</ref> |
||
The book's chief contention, which provides the rationale for its title, is that President Bush planned from early in his presidency to remove [[Saddam Hussein]] from power by force, rather than making any serious effort to use diplomacy or other means. The book describes [[White House]] deliberations implying that if Saddam were removed from power without a military invasion, Iraq would need a foreign-implemented [[regime change]]. It focuses mainly on President Bush, [[Vice President of the United States]] [[Dick Cheney]], [[U.S. Secretary of Defense]] [[Donald Rumsfeld]], [[U.S. National Security Advisor]] [[Condoleezza Rice]], [[U.S. Secretary of State]] [[Colin Powell]], [[General]] [[Tommy Franks]], and [[CIA Director]] [[George Tenet]], as well as [[Prime Minister of the United Kingdom]] [[Tony Blair]]. Other fixtures are [[White House]] [[Senior Advisor|adviser]]s such as [[Karen Hughes]] and [[Karl Rove]]. |
The book's chief contention, which provides the rationale for its title, is that President Bush planned from early in his presidency to remove [[Saddam Hussein]] from power by force, rather than making any serious effort to use diplomacy or other means. The book describes [[White House]] deliberations implying that if Saddam were removed from power without a military invasion, Iraq would need a foreign-implemented [[regime change]]. It focuses mainly on President Bush, [[Vice President of the United States]] [[Dick Cheney]], [[U.S. Secretary of Defense]] [[Donald Rumsfeld]], [[U.S. National Security Advisor]] [[Condoleezza Rice]], [[U.S. Secretary of State]] [[Colin Powell]], [[General]] [[Tommy Franks]], and [[CIA Director]] [[George Tenet]], as well as [[Prime Minister of the United Kingdom]] [[Tony Blair]]. Other fixtures are [[White House]] [[Senior Advisor|adviser]]s such as [[Karen Hughes]] and [[Karl Rove]]. |
||
| Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
* Bob Woodward says Bush decided that the US would invade Iraq on January 11, 2003. In interviews, [[Donald Rumsfeld]] and [[Condoleezza Rice]] have stated the decision was much later - not until March. |
* Bob Woodward says Bush decided that the US would invade Iraq on January 11, 2003. In interviews, [[Donald Rumsfeld]] and [[Condoleezza Rice]] have stated the decision was much later - not until March. |
||
*In the book, CIA director [[George Tenet]] is noted as stating the evidence that [[Saddam Hussein]] had [[weapons of mass destruction]] was "a [[slam dunk]]." Later, Tenet is forced to admit that his intelligence was flawed when months of post-war searches turned up nothing. |
*In the book, CIA director [[George Tenet]] is noted as stating the evidence that [[Saddam Hussein]] had [[weapons of mass destruction]] was "a [[slam dunk]]." Later, Tenet is forced to admit that his intelligence was flawed when months of post-war searches turned up nothing. |
||
*Woodward paints Bush as concerned that the [[United Nations]] (U.N.) weapons inspectors in Iraq were cheating or being cheated. In particular, he reports that [[Hans Blix]] was concealing some of his findings. There is no later published data to indicate this is the case. |
*Woodward paints Bush as concerned that the [[United Nations]] (U.N.) weapons inspectors in Iraq were cheating or being cheated. In particular, he reports that [[Hans Blix]] was concealing some of his findings. There is no later published data to indicate this is the case. |
||
| Line 53: | Line 53: | ||
==External links== |
==External links== |
||
* [http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A19691-2004Apr17.html Excerpts from book on washingtonpost.com] |
* [http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A19691-2004Apr17.html Excerpts from book on washingtonpost.com] |
||
*[http://www.nytimes.com/2004/04/28/books/review/0427books-woodward-widmer.html?ei=5007&en=2b336d81e9c61071&ex=1398484800&partner=USERLAND&pagewanted=all&position= NYT review By Ted Widmer, April 28, 2004] |
*[http://www.nytimes.com/2004/04/28/books/review/0427books-woodward-widmer.html?ei=5007&en=2b336d81e9c61071&ex=1398484800&partner=USERLAND&pagewanted=all&position= NYT review By Ted Widmer, April 28, 2004] |
||
Revision as of 05:24, 7 December 2011
 Cover of Plan of Attack by Bob Woodward | |
| Author | Bob Woodward |
|---|---|
| Sprache | Englisch |
| Subject | Political science, United States, Iraq, George W. Bush |
| Publisher | Simon & Schuster |
Publication date | April 19, 2004 |
| Publication place | Vereinigte Staaten |
| Media type | Print, ebook, audiobook |
| Pages | 480 |
| ISBN | [[Special:BookSources/ISBN+0-7432-5547-X%3Cbr+%2F%3EISBN+9780743255479%3Cbr+%2F%3EISBN+0743255488+%28pbk.%29 |ISBN 0-7432-5547-X ISBN 9780743255479 ISBN 0743255488 (pbk.)]] Parameter error in {{ISBNT}}: invalid character |
| OCLC | 54927217 |
| 956.7044/31 22 | |
| LC Class | DS79.76 .W66 2004b |
| Preceded by | Bush at War |
| Followed by | State of Denial: Bush at War, Part III |
Plan of Attack is a 2004 book by the well known US author and investigative reporter Bob Woodward. It was promoted as "a behind-the-scenes account of how and why President [George W.] Bush decided to go to war against Iraq" [1]
The book's chief contention, which provides the rationale for its title, is that President Bush planned from early in his presidency to remove Saddam Hussein from power by force, rather than making any serious effort to use diplomacy or other means. The book describes White House deliberations implying that if Saddam were removed from power without a military invasion, Iraq would need a foreign-implemented regime change. It focuses mainly on President Bush, Vice President of the United States Dick Cheney, U.S. Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, U.S. National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice, U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell, General Tommy Franks, and CIA Director George Tenet, as well as Prime Minister of the United Kingdom Tony Blair. Other fixtures are White House advisers such as Karen Hughes and Karl Rove.
Content
Plan of Attack picks up where Woodward's previous work, Bush at War left off, focusing on the decision-making that led up to the U.S.-led war in Iraq. As a result of the broad access Woodward was granted to the White House and to interview Bush administration officials, the book is able to paint a realistic picture of what happened behind the scenes. Woodward's own approach is to resist making judgements about the war itself, but rather try to describe the decision-making process. As a result of refraining to interpret the story that he presents, Woodward has been described as being both opposed to the Bush administration by some, as well as an apologist of the administration by others.[2][3]
Woodward describes in Plan of Attack a small group of administration officials including Vice-President Dick Cheney and Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld who were urging the President to go to war in Iraq beginning shortly after the September 11, 2001 attacks. Secretary of State Colin Powell and General Tommy Franks are described as being part of a group within the government more skeptical of the plan to invade Iraq.
In the narrative, President George W. Bush is described as having been intent on exercising a policy of regime change with regard to Iraq immediately after 9/11, a perspective that remained largely unchanged throughout the debates that would follow.
In the book, Secretary of State Colin Powell is depicted as being increasingly at odds with members of the Bush administration, and even goes as far as to reject some of the evidence put forward on weapons of mass destruction. However, by the end of the book, Powell ultimately endorses the invasion effort, a decision which is not entirely explained, other than to suggest Powell may have lined up with the President out of a sense of duty.
The Bush Administration's own view of Plan of Attack is interesting. When the book was published the administration denied many of the accounts in the book, but the Bush/Cheney re-election campaign listed Woodward's book as recommended reading nevertheless. (The Kerry/Edwards campaign also listed the book as recommended reading.)
Book versus individual accounts
- Bob Woodward says Bush decided that the US would invade Iraq on January 11, 2003. In interviews, Donald Rumsfeld and Condoleezza Rice have stated the decision was much later - not until March.
- In the book, CIA director George Tenet is noted as stating the evidence that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction was "a slam dunk." Later, Tenet is forced to admit that his intelligence was flawed when months of post-war searches turned up nothing.
- Woodward paints Bush as concerned that the United Nations (U.N.) weapons inspectors in Iraq were cheating or being cheated. In particular, he reports that Hans Blix was concealing some of his findings. There is no later published data to indicate this is the case.
- Woodward portrays Secretary of State Colin Powell as reluctant to go to war and often at odds with other Bush administration officials. Powell has stated for the record that he was always fully supportive of the administration and its efforts to invade Iraq, although he wanted tens or hundreds of thousands more soldiers on the ground.
- General Tommy Franks calls Pentagon official Douglas Feith "the fucking stupidest guy on the face of the earth." In his biography, American Soldier, Tommy Franks clarified the context of this phrase by stating that he was talking to his subordinates who were upset with Rumsfeld.