Jump to content

Protests against SOPA and PIPA: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 23: Line 23:
In line with the initial voices to stage an Internet blackout in December 2011, Wikipedia founder [[Jimmy Wales]] called for a "public uprising" against the proposed legislation, which critics fear would threaten free speech.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/news/why-i-want-to-bring-down-the-internet--for-a-day-6290703.html|title=Why I want to bring down the internet&nbsp;– for a day|first=Jerome|last=Taylor|accessdate=January 17, 2012|date=January 17, 2012|work=The Independent}}</ref>
In line with the initial voices to stage an Internet blackout in December 2011, Wikipedia founder [[Jimmy Wales]] called for a "public uprising" against the proposed legislation, which critics fear would threaten free speech.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/news/why-i-want-to-bring-down-the-internet--for-a-day-6290703.html|title=Why I want to bring down the internet&nbsp;– for a day|first=Jerome|last=Taylor|accessdate=January 17, 2012|date=January 17, 2012|work=The Independent}}</ref>


An initial discussion on this was held on Wales's talk page on the English Wikipedia, before being moved to its own project page, where the means of how the blackout would be implemented was discussed, such as whether to restrict the blackout to United States users based on [[geolocation]], or whether to simply have a single black page presented to the user prior to passing through to the site's content. Eventually, the discussion led to the choice of enacting a 24 hour blackout of the site on January 18, disabling normal reading and editing functions. A vote taken of about 1,800 editors favored the action.<ref name="cnn wales">{{cite news | url = http://edition.cnn.com/2012/01/17/tech/web/wikipedia-sopa-blackout-qa/index.html | title = Why Wikipedia is going down at midnight | first = John | last =Sutter | date = January 17, 2012 | accessdate =January 17, 2012 | publisher = CNN }}</ref> The blocking action was purposely not complete; users could access Wikipedia content from the mobile interface or mirror sites, or if they disabled [[Javascript]] or other web browser functions.<ref>{{cite news | url = http://www.extremetech.com/computing/114233-surviving-the-wikipedia-blackout-mirrors-caches-alternatives-apps-and-more| title= Surviving the Wikipedia blackout: Mirrors, caches, alternatives, apps, and more| first = Sebastian | last = Anthony | date = January 18, 2012 | accessdate =January 18, 2012 | work = [[ExtremeTech]] }}</ref><ref>{{cite news | first = Emily | last = Steel | accessdate = January 17, 2012 | url = http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2012/01/17/need-wikipedia-wednesday-heres-how-to-access-it/ | title = Need Wikipedia Wednesday? Here’s How to Access It | work = [[The Wall Street Journal]] | date = January 17, 2012}}</ref> Other Wikimedia projects were free to stage their own protest with the Foundation's support for any technical implementations.<ref name="cnn wales"/> Projects that chose to run a banner included the [[Albanian Wikipedia]], [[Arabic Wikipedia]], [[Bulgarian Wikipedia]], [[Catalan Wikipedia]], [[Chinese Wikipedia]], [[Croatian Wikipedia]], [[Dutch Wikipedia]], [[Georgian Wikipedia]], [[German Wikipedia]], [[Greek Wikipedia]], [[Japanese Wikipedia]], [[Korean Wikipedia]], [[Indonesian Wikipedia]], [[Italian Wikipedia]], [[Norwegian Wikipedia]], [[Portuguese Wikipedia]], [[Russian Wikipedia]], [[Serbian Wikipedia]], [[Spanish Wikipedia]], [[Swedish Wikipedia]], [[Ukrainian Wikipedia]], [[Vietnamese Wikipedia]] and [[Wikimedia Commons]].<ref>[http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:SOPA_initiative_screenshots/ SOPA initiative screenshots] ''[[Wikimedia Foundation]]'' Accessed: January 19, 2012</ref>
An initial discussion on this was held on Wales's talk page on the English Wikipedia, before being moved to its own project page, where the means of how the blackout would be implemented was discussed, such as whether to restrict the blackout to United States users based on [[geolocation]], or whether to simply have a single black page presented to the user prior to passing through to the site's content. Eventually, the discussion led to the choice of enacting a 24 hour blackout of the site on January 18, disabling normal reading and editing functions. A vote taken of about 1,800 editors favored the action.<ref name="cnn wales">{{cite news | url = http://edition.cnn.com/2012/01/17/tech/web/wikipedia-sopa-blackout-qa/index.html | title = Why Wikipedia is going down at midnight | first = John | last =Sutter | date = January 17, 2012 | accessdate =January 17, 2012 | publisher = CNN }}</ref> The blocking action was purposely not complete; users could access Wikipedia content from the mobile interface or mirror sites, or if they disabled [[Javascript]] or other web browser functions.<ref>{{cite news | url = http://www.extremetech.com/computing/114233-surviving-the-wikipedia-blackout-mirrors-caches-alternatives-apps-and-more| title= Surviving the Wikipedia blackout: Mirrors, caches, alternatives, apps, and more| first = Sebastian | last = Anthony | date = January 18, 2012 | accessdate =January 18, 2012 | work = [[ExtremeTech]] }}</ref><ref>{{cite news | first = Emily | last = Steel | accessdate = January 17, 2012 | url = http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2012/01/17/need-wikipedia-wednesday-heres-how-to-access-it/ | title = Need Wikipedia Wednesday? Here’s How to Access It | work = [[The Wall Street Journal]] | date = January 17, 2012}}</ref> Other Wikimedia projects were free to stage their own protest with the Foundation's support for any technical implementations.<ref name="cnn wales"/> Projects that chose to run a banner included the [[Albanian Wikipedia]], [[Arabic Wikipedia]], [[Bulgarian Wikipedia]], [[Catalan Wikipedia]], [[Chinese Wikipedia]], [[Croatian Wikipedia]], [[Dutch Wikipedia]], [[Georgian Wikipedia]], [[German Wikipedia]], [[Greek Wikipedia]], [[Japanese Wikipedia]], [[Korean Wikipedia]], [[Indonesian Wikipedia]], [[Italian Wikipedia]], [[Norwegian Wikipedia]], [[Portuguese Wikipedia]], [[Russian Wikipedia]], [[Serbian Wikipedia]], [[Spanish Wikipedia]], [[Swedish Wikipedia]], [[Ukrainian Wikipedia]], [[Vietnamese Wikipedia]] and [[Wikimedia Commons]].<ref>[http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:SOPA_initiative_screenshots / SOPA initiative screenshots] ''[[Wikimedia Foundation]]'' Accessed: January 19, 2012</ref>


Wikimedia Executive Director [[Sue Gardner]] posted an announcement of the Foundation's support for the blackout proposal on Wikimedia's blog. The post received over 7000 responses from the general public within the first 24 hours of its posting.<ref>[http://blog.wikimedia.org/2012/01/16/wikipedias-community-calls-for-anti-sopa-blackout-january-18/ Wikipedia’s community calls for anti-SOPA blackout January 18] ''[[Wikimedia Foundation]]'' Accessed: January 17, 2012</ref>
Wikimedia Executive Director [[Sue Gardner]] posted an announcement of the Foundation's support for the blackout proposal on Wikimedia's blog. The post received over 7000 responses from the general public within the first 24 hours of its posting.<ref>[http://blog.wikimedia.org/2012/01/16/wikipedias-community-calls-for-anti-sopa-blackout-january-18/ Wikipedia’s community calls for anti-SOPA blackout January 18] ''[[Wikimedia Foundation]]'' Accessed: January 17, 2012</ref>

Revision as of 01:52, 20 January 2012

A screenshot of the English Wikipedia page during the January 18 blackout

The English Wikipedia blackout was an online 24-hour protest by the English Wikipedia that commenced at midnight U.S. EST on January 18, 2012. In place of articles, the site showed only a message opposing the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) and the PROTECT IP Act (PIPA), legislation being proposed in the United States Congress.

On January 16, Wikimedia founder Jimmy Wales and Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Sue Gardner announced the blackout after conducting a 72-hour poll of the editing community. The general poll followed several weeks of discussion in smaller Wikipedia forums. The date was chosen to coincide with similar action by other websites, such as Reddit, and ran for 24 hours starting at 05:00 UTC (midnight Eastern Standard Time) on January 18.[1]

Background

The Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) and the PROTECT IP Act (PIPA) are bills that were introduced into the United States House of Representatives and the United States Senate in the last quarter of 2011. The two bills, through different means, are designed to provide legal mechanisms for copyright holders, such as music and movie studios, to combat digital piracy that occurs on non-United States websites. Both bills are extensions of the earlier Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) that enabled content producers to issue "take down" notices to Internet Service Providers (ISPs) and websites to remove infringing content. While the DMCA has been considered effective for patrolling of websites within the United States, the DMCA fails to address infringement from foreign websites.[2] Part of the language of the bills when originally proposed would allow for copyright owners to issue complaints to ISPs and other major websites, like Google or Bing, requiring them to remove the hostnames of infringing sites from their Domain name registry (DNS) and to delist entries in search engines to these sites.

Many of the companies and organizations supporting the proposed legislation are content producers, such as the Motion Picture Association of America, the Recording Industry Association of America and the Entertainment Software Association, and identified the need to have such laws to combat revenue losses associated with the copyright infringement from these foreign websites. However, some lawmakers and many technology and Internet firms and associations have expressed concerns that two bills' languages are too broad, and the concept of domain name blocking and search engine removal would amount to censorship of the Internet without due process. A common criticism of the bill addresses broad and unclear language, such as what entails "deliberate actions to avoid confirming a high probability" for a website. Google's policy director, Bob Boorstin, stated that a site like YouTube supporting user-generated content "would just go dark immediately" to comply with the legislation.[2] An alternative bill, the Online Protection and Enforcement of Digital Trade Act (OPEN), has been proposed by Representative Darrell Issa and Senator Ron Wyden, with support of technology companies; this bill places enforcement of copyright-infringing websites to the United States International Trade Commission instead of the Justice department, and would target the financial resources of these websites.[3]

In December 2011, SOPA was brought to the U.S. House Judiciary Committee to begin the process of marking up the bill prior to introduction to the House floor.[4] During this time, numerous websites began displaying banners and messages promoting their readerships to contact Congress to stop the progress of the bill, stating that their sites would be "blacked out" should the bill pass as a law. The markup session, in which several proposed amendments to address the concerns of technology companies were defeated, was eventually put on hold prior to the end of the year, to be restarted once Congress came back in session. Several technology websites began proposing the idea of an "Internet blackout" on the same day to protest SOPA and PIPA to occur before SOPA would be voted on on the House floor as a means of further protest.[5] Reddit was the first major site to announce an "Internet blackout" on January 18, 2012, and several other sites shortly followed, coordinating actions on that day.[6] Though Senator Patrick Leahy, the main sponsor for SOPA, had stated that they would remove the controversial DNS provisions prior to the blackout date, sites continued to plan the demonstration.[7]

In January 2012, in response to concerns over PIPA and SOPA, the White House stated that it "will not support legislation that reduces freedom of expression, increases cybersecurity risk, or undermines the dynamic, innovative global internet."[8]

Responses

English Wikipedia's response

Sue Gardner at the Wikimedia Foundation discussing the English Wikipedia Blackout of SOPA on the evening of January 17, 2012

In line with the initial voices to stage an Internet blackout in December 2011, Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales called for a "public uprising" against the proposed legislation, which critics fear would threaten free speech.[9]

An initial discussion on this was held on Wales's talk page on the English Wikipedia, before being moved to its own project page, where the means of how the blackout would be implemented was discussed, such as whether to restrict the blackout to United States users based on geolocation, or whether to simply have a single black page presented to the user prior to passing through to the site's content. Eventually, the discussion led to the choice of enacting a 24 hour blackout of the site on January 18, disabling normal reading and editing functions. A vote taken of about 1,800 editors favored the action.[10] The blocking action was purposely not complete; users could access Wikipedia content from the mobile interface or mirror sites, or if they disabled Javascript or other web browser functions.[11][12] Other Wikimedia projects were free to stage their own protest with the Foundation's support for any technical implementations.[10] Projects that chose to run a banner included the Albanian Wikipedia, Arabic Wikipedia, Bulgarian Wikipedia, Catalan Wikipedia, Chinese Wikipedia, Croatian Wikipedia, Dutch Wikipedia, Georgian Wikipedia, German Wikipedia, Greek Wikipedia, Japanese Wikipedia, Korean Wikipedia, Indonesian Wikipedia, Italian Wikipedia, Norwegian Wikipedia, Portuguese Wikipedia, Russian Wikipedia, Serbian Wikipedia, Spanish Wikipedia, Swedish Wikipedia, Ukrainian Wikipedia, Vietnamese Wikipedia and Wikimedia Commons.[13]

Wikimedia Executive Director Sue Gardner posted an announcement of the Foundation's support for the blackout proposal on Wikimedia's blog. The post received over 7000 responses from the general public within the first 24 hours of its posting.[14]

Despite the support of those polled for the action, some [quantify] Wikipedia editors blacked out their own user profile pages or resigned their administrative positions in protest of the blackout; one editor stated his "main concern is that it puts the organization in the role of advocacy, and that's a slippery slope".[15]

Other websites

In addition to Reddit's and Wikipedia's blackout plans, other popular websites opted to show their support in opposing SOPA and PIPA by participating in similar blackout activities.

Google announced their intention to join the blackout by altering their logo for the day. Clicking through the logo would take readers to an informational page about the bills, and the opportunity to sign a petition to be sent to Congress stating their concerns for these bills.[16]

Wired magazine's online site used Javascript to place black bars on most of the text on their page, as if the text was redacted, outside of their key article regarding SOPA/PIPA; readers could remove the bars with a mouse click.[17][18]

The photo-sharing website Flickr created the ability for a registered user to "censor" an unlimited number (up from a limit of ten) of photos as demonstration of how SOPA/PIPA regulation would affect the site.[19]

Other sites that participated in the blackout included Craigslist, Boing Boing, A Softer World, Cake Wrecks, Destructoid, dotSUB, Free Press, Newgrounds, Good.is, Good Old Games, little-apps.org, Mojang, MoveOn.org, Mozilla, Oh No They Didn't, Tucows, CallAvoiders.com and TwitPic, as well as around 7,000 other websites.[20][21] 4chan ran a banner and "censored" posts by users on all image boards.[22]

Physical demonstrations

SOPA/PIPA Protesters in New York City and other cities, in coordination with the Internet blackout

In addition to the online blackouts, protests in cities such as New York City, San Fransicso, and Seattle were held on January 18 to raise awareness of the two bills.[23][24]

Reaction

Pre-blackout

The announcement of the blackout was reported worldwide. Media that covered the story included ABC Australia,[25] CBC,[26] BBC,[27] der Spiegel,[28] Le Figaro,[29] Le Monde,[30] Libération,[31] Fox News,[32] The Guardian,[33] Menafn,[34] News Limited,[35] Sky News,[36] The Age,[37] The Hindu,[38] The New York Times,[39][40] The Washington Post,[41] The Wall Street Journal[42] and The Times of India.[43]

Several media organizations including The Washington Post, The Guardian, and NPR encouraged a "crowdsourcing solution for those left searching for answers" during the Wikipedia blackout by inviting users to ask questions on Twitter using the hashtag #altwiki.[44]

An executive of the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA) dubbed the blackout plan an example of the "gimmicks and distortion" that inflamed passions while failing to solve the problem of copyright infringement by "draw[ing] people away from trying to resolve what is a real problem, which is that foreigners continue to steal the hard work of Americans".[45] Former U.S. Senator and MPAA Director Chris Dodd stated that the coordinated shutdown was "also an abuse of power given the freedoms these companies enjoy in the marketplace today."[46]

Dick Costolo, CEO of social networking site Twitter, rejected calls for Twitter to join the protest, saying, "[c]losing a global business in reaction to single-issue national politics is foolish."[47] He later clarified he was referring to a blackout of Twitter and is supportive of the Wikipedia blackout.[48]

The sponsor of the bill, Representative Lamar S. Smith, called the blackout a "publicity stunt," stating "it is ironic a website dedicated to providing information is spreading misinformation about the Stop Online Piracy Act."[49]

During the blackout

The Wikimedia Foundation reported that there were over 162 million visits to the blacked-out version of Wikipedia during the 24-hour period, with at least 4 million uses of the site's front page to look up contact information for their U.S. Congressional representatives.[50] The usage of Wikipedia's front page increased enormously during the blackout with 17,535,733 page views recorded, compared with 4,873,388 on the previous day.[51] A petition created and linked to by Google recorded over 4.5 million signatures, while the Electronic Frontier Foundation reported that more than 1 million email messages were sent to congressmen through their site during the blackout.[52] MSNBC reported that over 2.4 million Twitter messages about SOPA, PIPA, and the blackouts were made during a 16 hour period on January 18; this included Facebook founder Mark Zuckerburg, who had not used the service since 2009, to encourage his followers to contact their congressmen.[53][54]

Creative America, one of the groups in favor of the SOPA and PIPA bills, used the blackout to prompt those affected by it to enjoy other forms of entertainment in lieu of their normal Internet activities; such ads appeared at Times Square in New York City and on various websites.[24]

CTV news in Canada published a "survival guide" for "getting around the blackout" on their national website, citing Wikipedia as the answer to "burning questions such as such as "Are chinchillas rodents?" and "What does ‘rickrolling' mean?" The guide provided detailed instructions on how to circumvent the ban and access the English Wikipedia during the protest.[55] CTV referred to the protest as "a date that will live in ignorance." [56]

Since the blackout was not meant to be complete but was rather as a means of raising awareness of the SOPA and PIPA bills, there were ways "around the blackout". Those who needed to access Wikipedia, were able to access its contents by disabling Javascript on their brower, trying to hit the Escape key before Javascript loads. There were other methods such as accessing a moblie version Wikipedia, using Google cache, or going to a mirror such as The Free Dictionary Encyclopedia.[57]

During the day of January 18, six senators who had been sponsors of the bills, including Marco Rubio, PIPA's co-sponsor, Orrin Hatch, Kelly Ayotte, Roy Blunt, John Boozman, and Mark Kirk, stated that they would withdraw their support for the bills.[58] Several other congressmen issued statements critical of the current versions of both bills.[59][60]

Post-blackout

The impact of the coordinated action was generally considered significant. Yochai Benkler of the Berkman Center for Internet & Society stated that the January 18 blackout was "a very strong public demonstration to suggest that what historically was seen as a technical system of rules that only influences the content industry has become something more," further adding "You've got millions of citizens who care enough to act. That's not trivial."[61] California House member Darrell Issa called the collective effort an unprecedented means for upsetting a backroom lobbying effort.[62] One Silicon Valley lobbyist said the content industry had "a lot to learn," noting that they don't have grassroots support: "There are no Facebook pages to call your congressman to support PIPA and SOPA."[63]

Newspaper editorials had mixed views. The Boston Herald called the protest a "hissy fit" by "Internet powerhouses" saying, "within hours of the online protest, political supporters of the bill... began dropping like flies, thus proving how very powerful these cyber-bullies can be."[64] The New York Times described the protest as "Noted, but as a Brief Inconvenience"[65] and, as well, offered an Opinion about the protest and possible accomplishments.[66] BBC News technology writer Rory Cellan-Jones was of the opinion that the blackout achieved its objectives but possibly at some cost to Wikipedia's reputation.[67] The shutdown also prompted a cartoon response from Matt (Matthew Pritchett) in the British Daily Telegraph.[68]

See also

References

  1. ^ "Websites blackout in SOPA anti-piracy protest". News.com.au. January 19, 2012. Retrieved January 19, 2012.
  2. ^ a b Pepitone, Julianne (January 17, 2012). "SOPA explained: What it is and why it matters". CNNMoney. Retrieved January 17, 2012.
  3. ^ Sasso, Brendan (January 18, 2012). "Issa pushes alternative anti-piracy bill". The Hill. Retrieved 18 Janaury 2012. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= (help)
  4. ^ Gross, Grant (December 12, 2011). "House Panel to Move Forward on Stop Online Piracy Act". PC World. Retrieved January 17, 2012.
  5. ^ Guy, Hugo (December 30, 2011). "Top web firms set to impose a blackout in protest against 'Big Brother' online piracy bill". Daily Mail. Retrieved January 17, 2012.
  6. ^ Cheredar, Tom (January 10, 2012). "Reddit goes black Jan. 18 to protest SOPA & PIPA — Who else will join?". Retrieved January 17, 2012.
  7. ^ Kravets, David (January 12, 2012). "Leahy Offers to Remove Net-Altering DNS Redirects in Anti-Piracy Bill". Wired. Retrieved January 17, 2012.
  8. ^ "Rupert Murdoch Sopa attack rebuffed by Google". BBC News. January 16, 2012. Retrieved January 17, 2012.
  9. ^ Taylor, Jerome (January 17, 2012). "Why I want to bring down the internet – for a day". The Independent. Retrieved January 17, 2012.
  10. ^ a b Sutter, John (January 17, 2012). "Why Wikipedia is going down at midnight". CNN. Retrieved January 17, 2012.
  11. ^ Anthony, Sebastian (January 18, 2012). "Surviving the Wikipedia blackout: Mirrors, caches, alternatives, apps, and more". ExtremeTech. Retrieved January 18, 2012.
  12. ^ Steel, Emily (January 17, 2012). "Need Wikipedia Wednesday? Here's How to Access It". The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved January 17, 2012.
  13. ^ / SOPA initiative screenshots Wikimedia Foundation Accessed: January 19, 2012
  14. ^ Wikipedia’s community calls for anti-SOPA blackout January 18 Wikimedia Foundation Accessed: January 17, 2012
  15. ^ Svensson, Peter (January 17, 2012). "Wikipedia Editors Question Site's Planned Blackout". Associated Press. Retrieved January 17, 2012.
  16. ^ Sandoval, Greg; McCullagh, Declan (January 17, 2012). "Google plans to use home page to protest SOPA". CNet. Retrieved January 17, 2012.
  17. ^ Potter, Ned (January 18, 2012). "SOPA Blackout: Wikipedia, Google, Wired Protest 'Internet Censorship'". ABC News. Retrieved January 19, 2012.
  18. ^ Hansen, Evan (January 18, 2012). "Why We've Censored Wired.com". Wired. Retrieved January 18, 2012.
  19. ^ Albanesius, Chloe (January 18, 2012). "Flickr SOPA Protest Lets You Black Out Photos". PC Magazine. Retrieved January 18, 2012.
  20. ^ Blackburn, David (January 19, 2012). "Wiki-world". The Spectator. Retrieved January 19, 2012.
  21. ^ "Web Goes On Strike". Sopastrike. Retrieved January 17, 2011.
  22. ^ "A Gallery Of The SOPA Blackout Protest Screens". Retrieved January 19, 2012.
  23. ^ Kinkaid, Jason (January 19, 2012). "TCTV: Hundreds Rally In The Streets Of NYC To Defend The Internet". TechCrunch. Retrieved January 19, 2012.
  24. ^ a b Wortham, Jenna (January 19, 2012). "With Twitter, Blackouts and Demonstrations, Web Flexes Its Muscle". New York Times. Retrieved January 19, 2012.
  25. ^ "Wikipedia to go dark in piracy protest". ABC Australia. Retrieved January 17, 2012.
  26. ^ "Wikipedia to go dark tonight protesting anti-piracy act". CBC. Retrieved January 17, 2012.
  27. ^ "Wikipedia joins web blackout in Sopa Act protest". BBC. Retrieved January 17, 2012.
  28. ^ "Wikipedia schaltet ab — aus Protest". spiegel.de. Retrieved January 17, 2012.
  29. ^ "Google se voile de noir pour protester contre la loi SOPA" (in French). Le Figaro. January 17, 2012. Retrieved January 19, 2012.
  30. ^ "Loi antipiratage : Wikipedia va fermer pendant 24 heures". lemonde.fr. Retrieved January 17, 2012.
  31. ^ Sophian Fanen. "Projet de loi Sopa : Internet piqué de grève". liberation.fr. Retrieved January 19, 2012.
  32. ^ "Wikipedia to go Dark 24 Hours". Fox News. January 17, 2012.
  33. ^ Sweney, Mark (January 17, 2012). "Wikipedia's blackout looms". The Guardian. Retrieved January 19, 2012. {{cite web}}: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher= (help)
  34. ^ "Wikipedia to shut down in censorship row". Menafn.com. Retrieved January 17, 2012.
  35. ^ "Wikipedia will black out for a whole day.... Oh, the horror". News Limited. Retrieved January 17, 2012.
  36. ^ "Wikipedia Blackout In Anti-Piracy Law Protest". Sky News. Retrieved January 17, 2012.
  37. ^ Wilkins, Georgia. "Anti-piracy protest triggers Wikipedia shutdown". The Age. Retrieved January 17, 2012.
  38. ^ "Wikipedia to go dark against U.S. anti-piracy bill". The Hindu. Retrieved January 17, 2012.
  39. ^ Wortham, Jenna. "Wikipedia to Go Dark on Wednesday to Protest Bills on Web Piracy". The New York Times. Retrieved January 17, 2012.
  40. ^ Wortham, Jenna (January 17, 2012). "Protest on Web Uses Shutdown to Take On Two Piracy Bills". NYTimes. Retrieved January 17, 2012.
  41. ^ Bell, Melissa. "Wikipedia blackout coming Jan. 18, says co-founder Jimmy Wales". The Washington Post. Retrieved January 17, 2012.
  42. ^ "Wikipedia Plans Blackout Over Piracy Bill — WSJ.com". The Wall Street Journal. New York: Dow Jones. January 17, 2012. ISSN 0099-9660. Retrieved January 17, 2012.
  43. ^ Wikipedia to shut down for 24 hours - The Times of India
  44. ^ David Beard (January 17, 2012), Wikipedia Blackout: An #altwiki Band-Aid The Washington Post
  45. ^ James Rainey, (January 16, 2012) Wikipedia to go offline to protest anti-piracy legislation The Los Angeles Times
  46. ^ MPAA's Chris Dodd takes aim at SOPA strike The Los Angeles Times January 17, 2012
  47. ^ Rushe, Dominic (January 17, 2012). "Twitter boss slams Wikipedia's 'silly' Sopa protest". The Guardian. Retrieved January 17, 2012.
  48. ^ Wikipedia's blackout looms | Technology | The Guardian
  49. ^ Sasso, Brendan (January 17, 2012). "Sponsor of online piracy bill calls Wikipedia blackout a 'publicity stunt'". The Hill. Retrieved January 17, 2012.
  50. ^ Wortham, Jenna (January 18, 2012). "With Twitter, Blackouts and Demonstrations, Web Flexes Its Muscle". New York Times. Retrieved January 18, 2012.
  51. ^ "Wikipedia article traffic statistics". stats.grok.se. January 19, 2012. Retrieved January 19, 2012.
  52. ^ McSherry, Corynne; Samuels, Julie (January 18, 2012). "Thank You, Internet! And the Fight Continues". Electronic Frontier Foundation. Retrieved January 18, 2012.
  53. ^ Chansanchai, Athima (January 19, 2012). "Twitter: More than 2.4 million SOPA tweets". MSNBC. Retrieved January 19, 2012.
  54. ^ Popkin, Helen A.S. (18 Janaury 2012). "SOPA inspires Mark Zuckerberg's first tweet since 2009". MSNBC. Retrieved January 18, 2012. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  55. ^ CTV website
  56. ^ "Wikipedia shuts down" - CTV news 18 Jan 2012
  57. ^ Anthony, Sebastian (January 18, 2012). "Surviving the Wikipedia blackout: Mirrors, caches, alternatives, apps, and more". ExtremeTech. Retrieved January 18, 2012.
  58. ^ Greenberg, Andy (January 18, 2012). "Amidst SOPA Blackout, Senate Copyright Bill Loses Key Supporters". Forbes. Retrieved January 18, 2012.
  59. ^ McCullagh, Declan; Mills, Elinor (January 18, 2012). "Protests lead to weakening support for Protect IP, SOPA". CNet. Retrieved January 18, 2012.
  60. ^ "Sopa: US backers end support for anti-piracy bill". BBC News Online. Retrieved January 19, 2012.
  61. ^ "Internet's dark day: Anti-piracy bills take a beating". Seattle Times. January 18, 2012. Retrieved January 18, 2012.
  62. ^ Engleman, Eric (January 18, 2012). "Google Protest of Anti-Piracy Bills Upends Traditional Lobbying". Bloomberg L.P. Retrieved January 18, 2012.
  63. ^ Palmer, Anna; Allen, Jonathan (January 18, 2012). "SOPA: Libertarians, tech titans poke old-school GOPers". Politico. Retrieved January 18, 2012.
  64. ^ "A halt to online theft" Boston Herald January 18, 2012
  65. ^ Cohen, Noam (January 18, 2012). "Wikipedia Absence Is Noted, but as a Brief Inconvenience". NYTimes. Retrieved January 19, 2012.
  66. ^ NYTimes Staff (January 18, 2012). "Online Piracy and Political Overreach". NYTimes. Retrieved January 19, 2012.
  67. ^ Rory Cellan-Jones (January 19, 2012), "Wikipedia - after the blackout" BBC News
  68. ^ Matt cartoon, Daily Telegraph January 19, 2012, accessed January 19, 2012

Bibliography