User talk:Cloudaoc

To contact me, please write here to start a new discussion. Tambien pueden comunicarse conmigo en español

stop UN-doing, im editing in good faith for this article

seriously there's nothing sinister about my edits, im just correcting the english and just mentioning who wrote what about the repaso. regrettably all the references about the repaso are from peruvian sources...therefore its imperative to point this out in order to protect the integrity of this article. You labelling my edits as vandelism is very obnoxious and makes me think you just want to protect a certain point of view. Since im not disputing the information or making any deletions my edits are justified, if you wish to go further with this be my guest--IggyAU (talk) 22:02, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

Sir, you must understand than the War of the Pacific is a historic article, not an historiographic one, there is current a discussion about this issue in its talk page, you can't affirm than the repase was only an Peruvian-sided statement, because it was A FACT, its denial by many Chilean sources do not imply than the repase never happen. You must state your arguments in the talk page and just made the addition only when consensus has been achieved, not before. You have been warned before, and if you insist in this behavior, I will report you to the administrators. What do you think about me is irrelevant, and I would not tolerate any accusation or implication about my participation in Wikipedia, I have 6 years doing this sir, you are just joining, I suggest than you must understand the Wikipedia policies, and follow the procedure previously stated to made any contribution to the article. Greetings. --Ian (CloudAOC) | ^Talk 15:59, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

Ian, thank you for trying to help Iggy understand the policies of Wikipedia, but at this time it would be best if you please give the matter a temporary rest and stop reverting his edits. I am telling you this so that you avoid falling for the 3RR. I have replied to him on the article, asking him to provide sources which support his position. If he continues disrupting the article, then I will notify the administrators (and there you will be able to state your position as well). But, once again, for the time being save yourself the trouble of getting into problems with the administrators. Best of wishes.--MarshalN20 | ^Talk 17:14, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

As to Iggy, which I am sure will read this, your edits are not justified. Please use the article's talk page to justify your position.--MarshalN20 | ^Talk 17:14, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

I will take the matter to the 3RR/Edit Warring board.--MarshalN20 | ^Talk 03:12, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

Re: WoTP

Cloudaoc, don't reply to him. He's obviously WP:GAMING, and by bringing forth a series of "issues" he is trying to justify his tags on the article. He has already broken the WP:3RR rule in the article.--MarshalN20 | ^Talk 18:25, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

OK, but, that's all? Just do nothing? We can't contact an administrator to stop him from doing this? He isn't already broke enough Wikirules to be sanctioned? I really don't understand... --Ian (CloudAOC) | ^Talk 18:33, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

If you fall for his game and start replying to his "issues", he will simply continue to push his POV on the matter. Yes, he can and will be sanctioned (I will make a 3RR report on him sometime today), what would be best is if you helped me with the 3RR report.

For example, could you please help me find the statement by Alexh where he mentions that Keysanger's listing of "issues" actually disrupts the talk page instead of discussing a point one-by-one? That is an important point made by the mediator, Alex.

Also, if you could find the consensus on the points he is again re-stating, that would help out as well.

At this time, the best thing we can do is use the WP rules to prevent Keysanger from disrupting the article. If we argue with him, that will only lead us to nothing. Just as he is gaming the system, we have to use the system's rules and punishments to get him to stop.--MarshalN20 | ^Talk 19:05, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

Keysanger at the 3RR noticeboard

Cloudaoc, I have submitted Keysanger's behavior at the 3RR noticeboard. Here is the link: [1]. If you would like to add anything, please do so whenever you have time. Hopefully the admin who reviews the case will provide us with more information as to how to handle Keysanger's behavior.--MarshalN20 | ^Talk 02:28, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Marshall, I'm afraid than there no other option than play Keysanger's game. So, at least for me, I'm not going to give up the article to him. I'll really appreciate your support. Regards--Ian (CloudAOC) | ^Talk 19:26, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

As of now I have some other matters to handle, but I will keep an eye on the discussion and step in to them if necessary. I believe that Keysanger simply listed those things in the talk page as a way to support the tags on the article. Aside from that, he won't make a move on the matter unless we make a move on things. If you want to tackle the issues, you have my support, but just remember to counter Keysanger's claims with direct evidence (and do what you can to avoid falling into any of his games of turning things personal).

Also, remember to use the past discussions (which are recent and, therefore, still relevant) in case he tries to bring back any of the old points already discussed. Best of wishes.--MarshalN20 | ^Talk 19:48, 25 January 2012 (UTC)