Talk:Radio 4 UK Theme

The name

Isn't Radio 4 UK Theme the name used for this piece, and therefore a better name for this article? I'll create a redirection from there to here, then we can argue about renaming things. --Mpk 22:25, 26 January 2006 (UTC)

I completely agree. the article should be moved there. Bwithh 03:09, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

Done. Fixing the redirects. --Mpk 07:56, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

---

Apologies for the inaccuracies originally. I am impressed with how this entry has grown; I was the original poster of the article in its original form, but I have to admit there has been a LOT of research done since, and it is completely up to date with the decision by the new controller of Radio 4 to scrap it. Thanks to all who have corrected items originally inaccurate. =- Whisperwolf 03:06, 3 February 2006 (GMT)

Arrangers

Although it has always been credited to Fritz Spiegl, the single states that the UK Theme was arranged by Manfred Arlan and Fritz Spiegl, and this was how it was announced on Brian Kay's Light Programme on the 6th of April.[1] Should this be added to the article, or does it simply refer to the single release? Rob 16:09, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

Good question. Can someone who has the CD have a look if it clarifies this? I know the manuscript was found in the Spiegls' loft, so maybe there were some bits missing which had to be reconstructed before it could be recorded. But Brian Kay made it sound like they originslly wrote it together. I can't find any info on Manfred Arlan on the web (unless he's was better known as a writer).

Incidentally, thanks for the link to the Light Programme. Now I've been able to hear the new recording. I would have bought a download of it, but refuse to while they are all full of DRM (and won't play on my computer anyway). I have to say, I prefer the original recording. JRawle (Talk) 17:50, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

I have the CD and it says Manfred Arlan and Fritz Spiegl arranged it on the sleeve, so perhaps it was a collaboration, although it seems odd that he hasn't been mentioned before, given the coverage of it. As for the new recording, I quite like it. It's a little more subtle than the original, perhaps because it's a smaller orchestra. Rob 21:02, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

Oddly enough I find the original version more subtle, well I think it begins that way and then rises to a more triumphant feel. When I looked at the liner notes a few days ago I too pondered the same question, the Torygraph discusses it here: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2006/02/27/ntheme27.xml&sSheet=/news/2006/02/27/ixhome.html hope it will be of help. Tony2Times 12:47, 7 April 2006 (UTC)

Oh right, thanks for the link; that's quite interesting - perhaps another addition for the "controversy" section. The plot thickens! Rob 16:50, 7 April 2006 (UTC)

BBC website

Take a look at the text describing the theme, which has appeared on the BBC website today. I wonder where they got it from? [2] JRawle (Talk) 11:30, 21 April 2006 (UTC)

Yes, I noticed that as well. It's probably a good idea to mention that here, too, just in case somebody thinks that it's a "copyvio" from the BBC page. This is the edit from the 5th of March where the four section format was introduced. Rob 12:08, 21 April 2006 (UTC)

I spotted that immediately, too! Very cheeky (and lazy) of them - though surely testament to the exhaustive detail of the piece (and the thoroughness of the writer)! They haven't even bothered to correct the typo "as well the national maritime tradition" - it should, of course, read "as well AS the national maritime tradition"! Though for some strange reason, they've changed the line "The theme is a fantasia of traditional British tunes" to "The UK Theme is a fantasia of traditional and Irish tunes"... And they should really have credited the original author of that part of the article; though perhaps they thought it was enough just to include a link to the Wikipedia page! Eljay* 00:34, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

UK Theme Album

This address was posted on the main page as a place to send support for an album including the UK Theme: Rob 18:17, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

People are urged to register their interest in this project by e-mailing their details to: [email protected] , or writing to: Sweetspot Music, c/o ReMark, Roxboro House, West Park Road, St. Helens, UK, WA10 4LJ. The UK Theme single contains an insert which can be returned to the aforementioned postal address free of charge.

Fair enough, I suppose! I didn't know about this 'talk' page before. So, to start a new discussion you press the "+" button, but what is the correct way to reply to an existing thread? (I'm sure I haven't done it right!)

No problem, I just thought a full address looked a little untidy on the main page. It's OK here though I would imagine, and I've put a link here from there. I hadn't read about an album until it was posted here actually, but sounds pretty good. Is there anything on the internet about it? As for the talk page, to post a reply I usually press the "edit" button next to the section heading then add a comment. Also, if you put a : at the beginning, it indents the comment and if you type four ~s it puts a signature and time on the end. Rob 18:08, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the help. It's strange that you didn't know about the album before! Don't you have the single? All the copies that I've seen contain a colour insert that says: "Thank you for buying the 'Save the Radio 4 Theme' campaign single. Proceeds from sales go to the British Light Music Society & Library. The same team are planning a full-length album of celebrated pieces selected from the tradition of Great British light music. 'Early One Morning' takes the form of a journey around the British Isles in one musical day. We shall set off at dawn to the rousing strains of the UK Theme, and end with that familar friend, Sailing By. On the way we shall visit the nation's favourite tunes such as Country Gardens and Lilliburlero, the BBC World Service theme. If you would like to be kept informed about the CD, please fill in your details below and drop this pre-paid card in the post. Or send an email with your details to [email protected]. Thank you." However, there is no mention of this album whatever on the campaign website, so perhaps it won't happen... Naturally, I hope it does, because it sounds like a real treat! It's therefore very important that everyone who bought the single shows their support by sending their details by post and/or email! Eljay* 00:26, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

I don't remember an insert, although it's quite possible it fell out... Looking at the sleeve notes, it also states that a website called "www.earlyonemorning.co.uk" would be about the single, but at the moment that just appears to redirect to the "save the radio 4 theme" site. Rob 17:58, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

Indeed... All the more strange that said website does not mention the album at all! Eljay* 19:58, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

Scheduling

Quote: The piece was played every day at 5:30am when Radio 4 began broadcasting...

This was true at the time that it was dropped, but not in 1973, when the theme was first used to open what was then called "Radio 4 UK" at something more like 5.55 on weekdays (the first programme of the day then was "News Briefing" at 6.00, followed by "Farming Today"; "Today" didn't begin until 6.30 in those days). -- Picapica 22:49, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Radio 4 UK Theme cover.jpg

Image:Radio 4 UK Theme cover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 03:56, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Sorted Rob (talk) 16:04, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Dispute

Hi Bardcom, just looking over the BI issue again, and as usual some of your edits are valid, some we could argue about, but there is one that stands out a mile as being, IMHO, completely wrong. I refer to the Radio 4 UK Theme. How do you know that Irish fishermen use RTE for the shipping forecast? I don't know if RTE provides a shipping forecast (I expect they do) but the BBC shipping forecast is for all, regardless of nationality, and if I was a betting man, I'd put money on the likelihood of a large number of Irish fishermen listening to it (and other nationalities undoubtedly do as well), but that would be OR if included here, a bit like your assertion. In the context of shipping areas the British Isles is admirably suited to describe the extent of their relevance. We're talking geography here, and the shipping areas completely surround all parts of the BI. If there's any subject where BI is correct that the Shipping Forecast must surely be it. I'll revert to BI in the article unless you can come up with a much better reason why it shouldn't be used. CarterBar (talk) 14:28, 28 June 2008 (UTC) (Move this to the relevant Talk page if you want). CarterBar (talk) 14:33, 28 June 2008 (UTC)

Hi CarterBar - I know that Irish fishermen use the RTE forecast because I grew up in this environment. The assertion that the BBC forecast is for all of the British Isles is incorrect. The BBC provides a service for it's license holders - British license holders, and as such the forecast is for areas where these fishermen are likely to be fishing. Most definitely not off the coast of Ireland as this would be illegal (and they're not Spanish fishermen). I'm not about to revert until we've discussed this edit - and thank you for discussing. --Bardcom (talk) 08:02, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

Hi Bardcom, I note that RTE do provide a shipping forecast but only for the waters around Ireland. As for the BBC, they not only provide services to the British licence payer but to others as well. Think of the BBC World Service, and the international element of the BBC website. Another point to bear in mind is how the "gale warning" Shipping Forecast is introduced: "Attention all shipping...", not "Attention British shipping...". The Shipping Forecast, broadcast on LW, has a range covering all of the sea areas around the British Isles and is clearly aimed at all mariners - not just fishermen - in all those sea areas, Irish ones included. The sea areas completely surround all of the islands and are of a geographic nature, so the use of British Isles seems highly appropriate. CarterBar (talk) 17:52, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

The BBC World Service is funded differently - not from license payers. The BBC Radio 4 is funded through British license payers. From the BBC article, it states As part of the BBC Charter, the Corporation cannot show commercial advertising on any services in the United Kingdom (television, radio, or internet). Outside the United Kingdom the BBC broadcasts commercially funded channels such as BBC America, BBC Canada, and BBC World News. In order to justify the licence fee, the BBC is expected to produce a number of high-rating shows[citation needed] in addition to programmes that commercial broadcasters would not normally broadcast. Please note the use of the term United Kingdom and not British Isles, as this is the correct broadcasting area coverage. Also please note the article BBC Radio 4 which has the opening line BBC Radio 4 is a domestic UK radio station. Again the use of the term domestic UK is accurate and correct. Please also note the frequencies section - it doesn't "broadcast" into Ireland's radio spectrum (officially...). One of the tenets of Wikipedia is consistency throughout the articles, therefore can you please revert the article? --Bardcom (talk) 09:19, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Actually you are both wrong:-)This Daily Torygraph article sort of explains that the extent is much, much farther than the BI. I've picked it up off Portugal on a good night. What does any reference to the possible geographical location of some phantom listeners possibly add to the encyclopaedicness (or is that encyclopaedicity?) of the article. Wherever the listeners are they will receive the broadcast, otherwise they are not the listeners are they? Crispness (talk) 14:19, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

And from the BBC site, this one is probably the most authoritative. Northwest Europe again. Crispness (talk) 14:22, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Many of the issues being raised here are irrelevant, but for the record the BBC broadcasts the Shipping Forecast on behalf of the UK Maritime and Coastguard Agency and it is obviously aimed at any mariner who cares to listen while in the vicinity of the British Isles, particularly in the sea areas that completely surround the islands - Man and Jersey included. I suggest the article is left in its current state - which is how it's been for some time - and if you're set on making a change to remove British Isles (why anyone would want to do so is quite beyond me in this particluar case) we should engage the services of a disinterested editor who could arbitrate in this matter. I'll accept any decision from an independent editor and I'm sure you would as well. Have you any suggestions as to the identity of a suitable person, if you want to follow this course of action? CarterBar (talk) 17:13, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Any editor can edit any page on WP so long as they are not restricted from doing so by a disciplinary ruling. Asking for an 'independent' editor should never be necessary. You don't seem to understand how things work. BTW, have you any reference for your assertions about the BI? For what its worth, if someone can receive a radio signal in Jersey, it is highly likely they can also receive it in France. The reason why the reference to the BI should be removed is that it is unencyclopaedic. That you don't understand that says more about you, I'd say. Crispness (talk) 21:56, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Hi, it seems there are a number of issues - let's see if we can separate them out. My point is consistency across Wikipedia articles, and references for claims made. My claims and edits are referencable to the existing Wikipedia articles. In addition, (and as a litmus test for using the term British Isles) what would happen if you introduces a phrase into the Radio 4 article stating that it broadcasts all over the British Isles?

The second issue is from CarterBar who states that the broadcast can be picked up further away than just the UK, and that because it is broadcast on "behalf of the UK Maritime and Coastguard Agency, it should reference the British Isles. I've read this article and it uses the term UK throughout - not the British Isles.

The third issue comes from Crispness who correctly states that if the argument is about the areas the broadcast can be picked up, then the term British Isles is not appropriate, and provides a reference to "Northwest Europe". He also asks CarterBar for a reference for using the term British Isles which we don't have to date. The personal comments are irrelevant.

I still maintain that the UK is the most appropriate term with the "most" references, and the most obvious references. But in the absence of a reference for the term "British Isles", the claim is OR. CarterBar, can you find/provide a suitable reference? --Bardcom (talk) 23:14, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Hi Bardcom, do a Google search of "Radio 4 UK Theme" and "British Isles" and you'll see plenty of examples that could be used as references, mainly to state that the tune comes from the "four corners of the BI" or words to that effect. It would therefore be possible to justify inclusion of the term on the basis of some of these. However, we are NEVER going to agree on this, nor obtain a general consensus, and there's no point on an edit war, so I say again, get an impartial view on the matter. I don't see any other way forward. CarterBar (talk) 17:13, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

CarterBar, you were asked for references to justify the usage. I take it that there are none. You are now trying to come up with some other way of introducing the term in a different context. I had hoped that we had developed a challenge-response mechanism of addressing our different opinions, and that it appeared to have been working. I would like to continue to believe that either of us can accept a reasonable request for a reference, or a reasonable argument (as we have done in the past). --Bardcom (talk) 15:21, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

Oh dear, I've forgotten what the basic argument is about here. I think the reference you request is to confirm that the sea areas "surround the British Isles" or that the LW broadcast is "heard around the British Isles". Well here's a few -

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

Now don't tell me they also mention "sea areas around Britain", and other variations; I know they do, but each of them also categorically gives a reference to the British Isles in this context. Take your pick from them, and there are many more out there. From the last of the above references we have this quote; "The reason for choosing BBC Radio 4 for the Shipping Forecast is not simply because it is a speech-based channel, but also because it broadcasts via longwave as well as FM, and the longwave signal can be received clearly at sea all around the British Isles. [my emphasis]" I hope this will do, because I feel we should be debating more important BI and related issues. I am reverting the change made by Crispness, since the debate was clearly ongoing and edits of this nature shouldn't be made when the subject is still being discussed. Likewise I'm reverting your Radio 4 edit because it is a related issue and we need (agreed) consistency. Anyway,why didn't you change the Shipping Forecast article to match that of Radio 4. Radio 4 is higher up the article hierarchy, so to speak. Incidentally, I've twice offered a way out of this impasse, by the use of some form of arbitration. What is your objection to this? CarterBar (talk) 17:14, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

<outdent>Lets take those refs one-by-one. The first one (Met Office) is unfortunately an educational page, simplified for its target audience, secondary school pupils. It takes about the coastal waters forecast around the BI, but this includes North and South Uitsire, Southeast Iceland, Biscay, Fitzroy and Trafalgar, none of which would come anywhere close to the WP definition of BI. The Met Office may consider Biscay to be 'around the BI', but unfortunately it doesn't wash on WP.

The second page is a user home page quick reference, rather than an academic treatise. Unfortunately, given the weight of other evidence available, it wouldn't stand up to the requirements of WP:V. It is very close to being a self published source as the last 2 blogs most definitely are. But the page is more of an eclectic collection of useful met sources covering the British Isles. But it goes much further than that, including met charts for the Caribbean and North Atlantic. Not a definitive sources.

Sorry but blogs 3 and 4 don't count. I made a factual edit to the Radio 4 Theme article. I removed any reference to an assumed range for the broadcasts. It is silly to contend that listeners need to be in a particular geographical location. The propogation of radio waves does not follow fixed rules. Anyone who can hear the forecast can use the information.Crispness (talk) 19:33, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

CarterBar, I agree with Crispness. These "references" are not adequate and don't stand up, especially in the face of the official pages I've already referenced. I'm deliberately not trying to edit war, but at this point I feel that you are entrenching in your view. If you believe arbitration is required, by all means seek it. --Bardcom (talk) 19:49, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

You are talking absolute rubbish! What a surprise, you agree with Crispness. Yes, I am going to take this to arbitration if you or Crispness revert the article again. CarterBar (talk) 20:04, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

Great argument. I'll consider your comment to mean that you have nothing more to add, and I will revert your changes as uncited and unreferenced. You are free to take whatever actions you like. --Bardcom (talk) 20:19, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

Will you agree to mediation in this matter? CarterBar (talk) 21:31, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

As a measure of the respect for our previous conversations and for you, then for this case - yes, I will. --Bardcom (talk) 08:29, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

(outdent)I've just seen the comment left by CarterBar Removal of the term "British Isles" for what appear to be political reasons.. Nothing in the argument above can be taken to suggest a political reason, and I object strongly to his insinuation. Ad hominen attacks are usually the last bastion of desperate editors pushing POV - attempting to distract attention from the edit onto the editor. --Bardcom (talk) 16:28, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

Third opinion

I am responding to a request for a third opinion.

British Isles is a geographical designation, while United Kingdom is a political one. In the context of gale warnings, the geographical designation seems obviously most pertinent. That broadcasts can be picked up farther away is known to most anyone who uses radio for such purposes, but there's no harm in mentioning it specifically.

If I missed any essential element in the dispute above, please respond here where the issue is being discussed rather than on my user talk page. Thanks. — Athaenara ✉ 20:40, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

The current wording ("fishermen and sailors within range" in Radio 4 UK Theme#Context and usage) seems exactly right. — Athaenara ✉ 21:50, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

(edit conflict)Hi, thank you for responding, but you are incorrect to simply state that the term should be used because "the geographical designation seems most pertinent". It would be helpful if you could elaborate a little on why you stated this - why is it most pertinent? You can also follow the discussions to date on my talk page. You may not be aware, but we have requested CarterBar (several times) to provide references, which he has been unable to do. The best he could provide was a reference which used Wikipedia as a reference - a circular reference if you will - that relied on the original incorrect usage of the term. I and another editor have provided references from numerous sources (including the BBC's own website, Radio 4's website, and the other relevant Wikipedia articles) that all use the term "United Kingdom". In addition, the range of the broadcasts, and the areas reported on, encompass the coastlines of Northern Europe Link to Met Office areas. --Bardcom (talk) 22:15, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

• Comment: Nowhere in my post does the phrase "should be used" appear. In responding to other editors' posts, please refer to what was actually posted. — Athaenara ✉ 01:44, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

(Addendum)I also agree that the wording chosen by User:Crispness is less contentious while still remaining more accurate than the previous entry. I'm happy to leave it at that wording. --Bardcom (talk) 22:15, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

I didn't know at first what you meant, but I found the "within range" diff. — Athaenara ✉ 01:51, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Date

So it was commissioned in 1973 but first broadcast in 1978? Could someone clarify this? Drutt (talk) 19:06, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, it is a bit confusing at the moment. The UK Theme was commissioned and first broadcast in 1978, but the 2006 BBC Press release got it wrong because its information was taken off here (!) The 1973 date refers to an earlier piece called the "Skipping Tune", also by Spiegl, which is where the confusion arose from. Rob (talk) 20:24, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

Shipping Forecast

It's easy to misunderstand the statement that the Radio 4 Theme was used before the morning Shipping Forecast. You might want to add something to make it clear to readers that the late night Shipping Forecast has a different preceding theme which is called 'Sailing By', which was written by Ronald Binge, in 1963. [ en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sailing_By ]