Talk:Remand (court procedure): Difference between revisions
m Signing comment by 76.126.109.131 - "→German link: new section" |
m →Sub divided: fix post-move remand wikilink; fix a 2nd redirect |
||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
I have sub-divided the [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Remand_%28court_case%29&oldid=149223229 former page 'remand'] to: |
I have sub-divided the [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Remand_%28court_case%29&oldid=149223229 former page 'remand'] to: |
||
*[[Remand (court case)]] |
*[[Remand (court procedure)|Remand (court case)]] |
||
*[[Remand (imprisonment)]] |
*[[Remand (detention)|Remand (imprisonment)]] |
||
[[User:Pigsonthewing|Andy Mabbett]] | [[User talk:Pigsonthewing|Talk to Andy Mabbett]] 22:12, 4 August 2007 (UTC) |
[[User:Pigsonthewing|Andy Mabbett]] | [[User talk:Pigsonthewing|Talk to Andy Mabbett]] 22:12, 4 August 2007 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 08:04, 3 March 2012
 | Law Stub‑class | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
Why was "may not have to work or attend (prison) education" removed from the list of benefits of a remand prisoner? Whilst I understand this may not be true worldwide, its certainly true in some prisons in Australia. -- Longhair | Talk 22:11, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- I'm adding this back in. The ip that removed it has 2 edits and hasn't replied here after some time. -- Longhair | Talk 07:49, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Reads far too much like a dictionary
Just a comment, but the article really does read a lot like a definition from a legal textbook or a dictionary. I know what remand means, but for a lay reader it would probably be quite confusing and would require a fair degree of link checking to work out what the term actually refers to. Perhaps clarity over an obsession with definitional accuracy is the way to go for an article like this.
Half an article?
Is there any reason why a principal, perhaps primary, definition of remand ("To send back. The sending by the appellate court of the cause [sic] back to the same court out of which it came, for purpose of having some further action taken on it there." Black's Law Dictionary, Fifth Edition, ©1979) doesn't appear in this article? Unless there is objection or some other issue of which I'm unaware, I'll edit the article to include it in a day or two. Duckecho 05:15, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
First look at second meaning
I wikified what words were available. I put the court-to-court definition first because it's shorter. I put two sources, one for etymology and one for legal usage. Feel free to massage as necessary. Duckecho 04:57, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Sub divided
I have sub-divided the former page 'remand' to:
Andy Mabbett | Talk to Andy Mabbett 22:12, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
2007-12-10 Automated pywikipediabot message
 | This page has been transwikied to Wiktionary. The article has content that is useful at Wiktionary. Therefore the article can be found at either here or here (logs 1 logs 2.) Note: This means that the article has been copied to the Wiktionary Transwiki namespace for evaluation and formatting. It does not mean that the article is in the Wiktionary main namespace, or that it has been removed from Wikipedia's. Furthermore, the Wiktionarians might delete the article from Wiktionary if they do not find it to be appropriate for the Wiktionary. Removing this tag will usually trigger CopyToWiktionaryBot to re-transwiki the entry. This article should have been removed from Category:Copy to Wiktionary and should not be re-added there. |
--CopyToWiktionaryBot (talk) 05:14, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
German link
I don't know anything about the law, but reading this article and the one for the German link, I get the impression that these are really two different things and that the wik linking of the two is incorrect. For example, it seems the Remand is only a sort of correction or possib le correction, whereas it seems U-haft is holding during initial investigation. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.126.109.131 (talk) 00:57, 15 August 2010 (UTC)