User:Colin Kimbrell: Difference between revisions
High-C |
Removing comment that was probably intended for my talk page. |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
|} |
|} |
||
</div> |
</div> |
||
Why are you trying to delete the High-C entry? High-C appeared on two indy releases, as the guidelines require. What is your reason for trying to do this? [[User:Jason Gortician|Jason Gortician]] 22:22, 12 April 2006 (UTC) |
|||
[[Category:Counter Vandalism Unit Member/wikipedia/en|{{PAGENAME}}]] |
[[Category:Counter Vandalism Unit Member/wikipedia/en|{{PAGENAME}}]] |
||
Revision as of 22:38, 12 April 2006
This is my page. I don't have anything to say, but I was tired of the red link.
It has been vandalized fifteen times. None were particularly clever, though.
This user is a member of the Association of Wikipedians Who Dislike Making Broad Judgements About the Worthiness of a General Category of Article, and Who Are In Favor of the Deletion of Some Particularly Bad Articles, but That Doesn't Mean They are Deletionist
 The motto of the AWWDMBJAWGCAWAIFDSPBATDMTD is Est omnino difficile iudicare inclusionis meritum cuiusdam rei in encyclopædia cum ratio sciendi quid populi referat incerta sit, sed nihilominus aliquid encyclopædiam dedecet, which translates to, "it is generally difficult to judge the worthiness of a particular topic for inclusion in an encyclopedia considering that there is no certain way to know what interests people, but some topics nevertheless are not fit for an encyclopedia." This motto reflects the desire of these Wikipedians to be reluctant, but not entirely unwilling, to remove articles from Wikipedia. |
| File:CVU2.PNG | This user is a member of the Counter Vandalism Unit. |
