Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Juliana Chen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. slakr^\ talk / 00:28, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

Juliana Chen

Juliana Chen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Is this magician sufficiently notable? Nothing here indicates that she is. A Google search doesn't show definite notability, as far as I can tell. Delete. --Nlu (talk) 23:32, 20 October 2011 (UTC)

I'm kind of undecided, to be honest. A quick search did bring some links up but many of the links are either stories where she's one of many mentioned or they're pages that were probably created by Chen or at her request. I'm going to link the best of the things I found here so they can be weeded through. I'm leaning towards not notable and delete, but I wanted to list there here anyway. [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]. I think that most of these are puff articles, but I wanted to ask to be sure. Tokyogirl79 (talk) 07:39, 21 October 2011 (UTC)tokyogirl79

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Magic-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:58, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:58, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

---

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steven Zhang ^{The clock is ticking....} 00:04, 28 October 2011 (UTC)

---

• Keep per sources cited by Tokyogirl. A couple of them are keepers, a couple borderline keepers, one a fluff piece, but that should be enough to tip the teeter-totter to the "keep" side right there, in my opinion. Carrite (talk) 15:42, 28 October 2011 (UTC)

• Neutral This is a sentence not an article, if it could be expanded I would love to defend it. – Phoenix B 1of3 (talk) 18:45, 28 October 2011 (UTC)

---

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger _{One ping only} 04:30, 4 November 2011 (UTC)

---

• Keep Juliana Chen passes WP:BIO, as evidenced by the following sources: "Vancouver magician turns dream into reality" from The Record, "People: A belief in magic" from Maclean's, "Queen of the inexplicable: Though she's practically the invisible woman in Vancouver, Juliana Chen may be the greatest magician in the world" from The Vancouver Sun, "Magician's success no trick: Performer has travelled a long way from her native China to become a leading master of manipulation" from The Province, "Chinese immigrant rediscovers love for magic tricks" from The StarPhoenix, and "Now you see her" from The Globe and Mail. Goodvac (talk) 06:03, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

• Keep – per impressive research and several reliable sources cited above by User:Goodvac. Topic is passing GNG. Northamerica1000^(talk) 14:26, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.