Octopus Cards Limited: Difference between revisions
m Typo fixing per WP:HYPHEN, replaced: wholly- → wholly (2) using AWB (7660) |
|||
| Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
==Controversy over use of personal data== |
==Controversy over use of personal data== |
||
Octopus became the centre of a controversy in mid 2010, when some individuals complained that they had received unsolicited sales calls which they alleged came from business partners of Octopus. Octopus chief executive Prudence Chan initially denied that any personal data had been given over to third parties, but said that cardholders' consent to use their data would have been given when they registered for the Octopus reward program, which had an opt-out mechanism.<ref>Siu, Beatrice (8 August 2010) [http://www.thestandard.com.hk/news_detail.asp?pp_cat=30&art_id=100264&sid=28835060&con_type=3&d_str=20100708&sear_year=2010 "'Your data's in safe hands'"], ''The Standard''</ref> The company came under fire for deception when a former worker at an insurance company said that Octopus had bought data on 2.4 million reward scheme cardholders.<ref>Yau, Thomas (15 July 2010). [http://www.thestandard.com.hk/news_detail.asp?pp_cat=11&art_id=100560&sid=28905404&con_type=1&d_str=20100715&sear_year=2010 "Octopus in hot water over `sold' personal data claim"], ''The Standard'' </ref> At a hearing before the Privacy Commission on 26 July 2010, it was subsequently revealed that it had entered into partnership agreements through which card-holders' personal details were sold to an insurance company and others for HK$44 million. The company disclosed that personal data collected from Octopus rewards program had been sold to six vendors since 2002, and that two such relationships were still current. The company was further criticised when it was revealed that there were no safeguards on the transfer or reuse of the personal data to parties outside of Hong Kong.<ref>Chan, Samuel (27 July 2010). [http://www.thestandard.com.hk/news_detail.asp?pp_cat=30&art_id=101004&sid=29033262&con_type=3&d_str=20100727&sear_year=2010 'Tentacle of lies'], ''The Standard'' </ref> Chan apologised before a Legislative Council's finance affairs panel meeting; she said that she 'might have used a wrong definition of selling [personal data] at the time'. Legislators from all parties demanded Chan's resignation for attempting to mislead the public, thus precipitating a crisis of confidence in the company, and putting the company into disrepute by her lies.<ref>Tsang, Phyllis (28 July 2010). "It's a four-letter word, Prudence – Q-U-I-T", ''South China Morning Post''</ref> |
Octopus became the centre of a controversy in mid 2010, when some individuals complained that they had received unsolicited sales calls which they alleged came from business partners of Octopus. Octopus chief executive Prudence Chan initially denied that any personal data had been given over to third parties, but said that cardholders' consent to use their data would have been given when they registered for the Octopus reward program, which had an opt-out mechanism.<ref>Siu, Beatrice (8 August 2010) [http://www.thestandard.com.hk/news_detail.asp?pp_cat=30&art_id=100264&sid=28835060&con_type=3&d_str=20100708&sear_year=2010 "'Your data's in safe hands'"], ''The Standard''</ref> The company came under fire for deception when a former worker at CIGNA, an insurance company said that Octopus had bought data on 2.4 million reward scheme cardholders.<ref>Yau, Thomas (15 July 2010). [http://www.thestandard.com.hk/news_detail.asp?pp_cat=11&art_id=100560&sid=28905404&con_type=1&d_str=20100715&sear_year=2010 "Octopus in hot water over `sold' personal data claim"], ''The Standard'' </ref> At a hearing before the Privacy Commission on 26 July 2010, it was subsequently revealed that it had entered into partnership agreements through which card-holders' personal details were sold to CIGNA, an insurance company and others for HK$44 million. The company disclosed that personal data collected from Octopus rewards program had been sold to six vendors since 2002, and that two such relationships were still current. The company was further criticised when it was revealed that there were no safeguards on the transfer or reuse of the personal data to parties outside of Hong Kong.<ref>Chan, Samuel (27 July 2010). [http://www.thestandard.com.hk/news_detail.asp?pp_cat=30&art_id=101004&sid=29033262&con_type=3&d_str=20100727&sear_year=2010 'Tentacle of lies'], ''The Standard'' </ref> Chan apologised before a Legislative Council's finance affairs panel meeting; she said that she 'might have used a wrong definition of selling [personal data] at the time'. Legislators from all parties demanded Chan's resignation for attempting to mislead the public, thus precipitating a crisis of confidence in the company, and putting the company into disrepute by her lies.<ref>Tsang, Phyllis (28 July 2010). "It's a four-letter word, Prudence – Q-U-I-T", ''South China Morning Post''</ref> |
||
==References== |
==References== |
||
Revision as of 07:51, 5 December 2012
| Company type | Subsidiary |
|---|---|
| Industry | payment systems |
| Predecessor | None |
| Founded | Hong Kong (1994) |
| Headquarters | Hong Kong, Hong Kong , People's Republic of China |
Number of locations | Hong Kong, China |
Area served | Hong Kong, Shenzhen and other major Chinese cities |
Key people | David Tang |
| Products | Octopus card |
| Services | smart card payment systems |
| Owner | major transport operators in Hong Kong |
Number of employees | 200 |
| Parent | Octopus Holdings Limited |
| Subsidiaries | Octopus Card Limited Octopus International Projects Limited Octopus Rewards Limited Octopus Rewards Limited Octopus China Investments Limited |
| Website | www.octopuscards.com/ |
Octopus Cards Limited (Chinese: 八達通卡有限公司) is the operator of the Octopus rechargeable contactless smart card used in an electronic payment system in Hong Kong.
Octopus Cards Limited is a wholly owned subsidiary of Octopus Holdings Limited. Established in 1994 under the name of "Creative Star" by the major transportation companies in Hong Kong, Octopus Cards Limited is the operator of the Octopus System and the issuer of Octopus.
The Octopus card was introduced in 1997 with the aim of providing a simple way to pay fares on public transport in Hong Kong. Octopus then extended its reach into simple micropayments for purchases in retail outlets and a simple way for cardholders to gain access to buildings and schools and to identify themselves. In January 2002, it was renamed Octopus Cards Limited from Creative Star. Prompted by the business expansion of the Octopus card, Octopus Holdings Limited was formed in 2005 after a company restructure and Octopus Cards Limited became a wholly owned subsidiary of the new company.[1][2] Today, over 440 service providers accept Octopus, and new uses are regularly being added.
Octopus has a global reputation, and is currently the world's leading and most extensive contactless smartcard system, with the highest penetration, the highest transaction volume and the widest scope of applications.
Controversy over use of personal data
Octopus became the centre of a controversy in mid 2010, when some individuals complained that they had received unsolicited sales calls which they alleged came from business partners of Octopus. Octopus chief executive Prudence Chan initially denied that any personal data had been given over to third parties, but said that cardholders' consent to use their data would have been given when they registered for the Octopus reward program, which had an opt-out mechanism.[3] The company came under fire for deception when a former worker at CIGNA, an insurance company said that Octopus had bought data on 2.4 million reward scheme cardholders.[4] At a hearing before the Privacy Commission on 26 July 2010, it was subsequently revealed that it had entered into partnership agreements through which card-holders' personal details were sold to CIGNA, an insurance company and others for HK$44 million. The company disclosed that personal data collected from Octopus rewards program had been sold to six vendors since 2002, and that two such relationships were still current. The company was further criticised when it was revealed that there were no safeguards on the transfer or reuse of the personal data to parties outside of Hong Kong.[5] Chan apologised before a Legislative Council's finance affairs panel meeting; she said that she 'might have used a wrong definition of selling [personal data] at the time'. Legislators from all parties demanded Chan's resignation for attempting to mislead the public, thus precipitating a crisis of confidence in the company, and putting the company into disrepute by her lies.[6]
References
- ^ "Our Company". Octopus Holdings Limited. Retrieved 12 July 2007.
- ^ "Operation of the Octopus Card in Hong Kong" (PDF). Hong Kong SAR Legislative Council Secretariat. Retrieved 12 July 2007.
- ^ Siu, Beatrice (8 August 2010) "'Your data's in safe hands'", The Standard
- ^ Yau, Thomas (15 July 2010). "Octopus in hot water over `sold' personal data claim", The Standard
- ^ Chan, Samuel (27 July 2010). 'Tentacle of lies', The Standard
- ^ Tsang, Phyllis (28 July 2010). "It's a four-letter word, Prudence – Q-U-I-T", South China Morning Post