User talk:Cresix

Article Feedback deployment

Hey Cresix; I'm dropping you this note because you've used the article feedback tool in the last month or so. On Thursday and Friday the tool will be down for a major deployment; it should be up by Saturday, failing anything going wrong, and by Monday if something does :). Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 22:25, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Pope Francis

Wait. I have not violated copyright.--EeuHP (talk) 18:10, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

I don't understand you. I've modified a photo of another user. That picture is licensed. Where I've violated copyright?--EeuHP (talk) 18:15, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

Then, the other user is not the author of the photo? He put a invalid license? That means I have modified a material that violates copyright and therefore I am accused of violating copyright?--EeuHP (talk) 18:21, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

Did not understand why I was accused, but if the photo of the other user violated the rules, I understand. Next time I will focus more on the quality of the licenses.--EeuHP (talk) 18:29, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

Insomnia

Hi. I don't understand the basis for this revert. There have been a lot of junk edits recently apparently as part of some classroom project, but that edit actually strikes me as valid and well-sourced. Regards, Looie496 (talk) 01:45, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

March 2013

My reply. Janus Savimbi (talk) 21:35, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

Prince Harry

It is a blog, not a WP:RS, he will not represent "England" (try UK or GB) and his indiscretions in LV are irrelevant to a future representative visit. Leaky Caldron 17:54, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

Agreed. It's also rather churlish to accuse someone of Edit Warring the second time you yourself have reverted an edit. GimliDotNet ^{(Speak to me,Stuff I've done)} 18:06, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

It's also disingenuous to claim the source is NBC when it's not, it's a blog from someone who sometimes contributes to NBC GimliDotNet ^{(Speak to me,Stuff I've done)} 18:10, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

(edit conflict):You can ask what you like. I'll be replacing it with an accurate, properly sourced, non-infotainment version. If you don't know that the Royal Family does not represent England (regardless of your reliable American source) maybe members of the British Royal Family is an area for you to avoid. Leaky Caldron 18:14, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

I have pointed out that the content was inaccurate, the sourcing was unacceptable, that it repeated sensationalist material already covered elsewhere and that your knowledge on the subject is lacking. I told you that if and when it is reliably sourced it would be replaced. Another editor has now reverted your inappropriate reinstatement of non-encyclopaedic content. The original errors are not my responsibility or yours but if you insist on them being correct don't be surprised when someone tells you straight. Leaky Caldron 18:36, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

You have now claimed twice that I have made a reference to "editors and their nationality" - the first specifically and the second obliquely. If you are considering WP:ANI please be sure that you can stand up your claim that I was off-colour about an editor's nationality. This was a content dispute caused by an editor lacking clue (the IP - check out his talk page) and involving an article covered by WP:PCPP. As a patroller I take my responsibility seriously. Leaky Caldron 19:31, 25 March 2013 (UTC)