Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/GroundRisk: Difference between revisions
m move sockmaster comment to appropriate section |
GroundRisk (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
*From above comments though, the sockmaster clearly hasn't learned from that block if they are denying their other sock activity. [[User:Mutt Lunker|Mutt Lunker]] ([[User talk:Mutt Lunker|talk]]) 14:56, 14 May 2013 (UTC) |
*From above comments though, the sockmaster clearly hasn't learned from that block if they are denying their other sock activity. [[User:Mutt Lunker|Mutt Lunker]] ([[User talk:Mutt Lunker|talk]]) 14:56, 14 May 2013 (UTC) |
||
What evidence do you guys have for this being an account of mine?? I have never even seen this page until now! [[User:GroundRisk|GroundRisk]] ([[User talk:GroundRisk|talk]]) 17:11, 14 May 2013 (UTC) |
|||
----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> |
----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> |
||
Revision as of 17:11, 14 May 2013
GroundRisk
- GroundRisk (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
13 May 2013
– A user has requested CheckUser. An SPI clerk will shortly look at the case and endorse oder decline the request.
- Suspected sockpuppets
- Julia Weiland (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
- Editor interaction utility
Creator of Cultural infiltration, which bears strong similarities to articles created by GroundRisk and socks (Civilization Jihad, Economic jihad, Semantic infiltration), content reverted at Transnational organization - both in terms of content (scary Muslims and Soviets undermining our society) and style (capital letters in headings, well-formatted citations without the use of templates, the use of a sandbox). FWIW, I found this article when searching WP for articles that cited Patrick Sookhdeo, whom several GroundRisk articles cited, in order to flush out more socks. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 18:50, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims. First of all, this is a ridiculous accusation. I can't believe you are accusing every single person that uses that book to be a sockpuppet. Also are you seriously denying cultural infiltration from Soviets during the Cold War. HAHA wow. You need to read some books buddy. GroundRisk (talk) 14:07, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
- Requesting checkuser on this one. I'll also note that GroundRisk is not blocked and this is their comment regarding the investigation. Jafeluv (talk) 10:44, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
- I've blocked Julia Weiland as an obvious sock. I did not block the sockmaster because he already received a week-long block for socking on May 2, which is after the Julia Weiland sock was active. --Spike Wilbury (talk) 14:14, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
- From above comments though, the sockmaster clearly hasn't learned from that block if they are denying their other sock activity. Mutt Lunker (talk) 14:56, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
What evidence do you guys have for this being an account of mine?? I have never even seen this page until now! GroundRisk (talk) 17:11, 14 May 2013 (UTC)