Talk:James E. West (politician): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 14:53, 10 June 2006

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was Moved by Cleared as filed. —Locke Cole ^{(talk) (e-mail)} 19:20, 25 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

For some reason James E. West redirects to James West which is a dab page. If someone types in "James E. West" I doubt they want to be sent to a dab page for the more generic "James West". Amongst people with "James E. West" as their name on Wikipedia, I also believe this to be the more notable "James E. West". (The other "James E. West" article is about Boy Scouts guy, and is currently a copyvio at that).

Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one sentence explanation, then sign your vote with ~~~~

Support --Locke Cole 02:43, 9 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

Add any additional comments

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Merge Shannon Sullivan to here

Hello. I have proposed that Shannon Sullivan be merged into here. Essentially the Sullivan article would be removed and redirected here. Her role is already mentioned in the West article. The long autobio that is currently on her page would be removed completely. Please provide your thoughts. Lbbzman 14:29, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Page moves

I've moved it back. I'm not entirely sure if there was an attempt to setup a dab page (which is silly IMO, there's only two articles that dab to "James E. West", and having "James E. West" redirect to "James West" is equally silly; if someone types in "James E. West" they don't want to be sent to a less specific dab page), but "James E. West" was redirecting to the "James E. West (politician)" article anyways before I moved it back. If there's some argument over who's more notable, we can hash that out, but I really don't see the harm in dab'ing to "James E. West (scouting)" at the very top of the article for the time being. —Locke Cole • t • c 07:19, 26 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was move. —Nightstallion (?) 14:53, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

James E. West → James E. West (politician) — This no longer serves being the main name, when there are several people for the same name — Talk:James E. West — Chris 00:52, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Survey

Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~

Support move, for reasons stated below. Chris 01:00, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support. The two men seem equally notable, so a disambiguation page should be at James E. West. -Will Beback 01:50, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Will Beback. Lbbzman 02:38, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

As there are two James E. Wests, and as both are of import to different groups of people, I have requested to the moderators to move this page to "James E. West (politician)". Not worried about who's more notable, more about both being notable enough to have their subject mentioned in the title of their article, as per Wikipedia policy. Chris 00:58, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-{{move|James E. West (politician)}}
 ==Requested move==
 <div class="boilerplate" style="background-color: #F8EABA; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #C0C090;">
@@ Line 28: / Line 26: @@
 I've moved it back. I'm not entirely sure if there was an attempt to setup a dab page (which is silly IMO, there's only two articles that dab to "James E. West", and having "James E. West" redirect to "James West" is equally silly; if someone types in "James E. West" they don't want to be sent to a less specific dab page), but "James E. West" was redirecting to the "James E. West (politician)" article anyways before I moved it back. If there's some argument over who's more notable, we can hash that out, but I really don't see the harm in dab'ing to "James E. West (scouting)" at the very top of the article for the time being. —[[User:Locke Cole|Locke Cole]] • [[User talk:Locke Cole|t]] • [[Special:Contributions/Locke Cole|c]] 07:19, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
+<div class="boilerplate" style="background-color: #efe; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px dotted #aaa;"><!-- Template:polltop -->
+:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the {{{type|proposal}}}. <font color="red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</font> Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. ''
+{{{result|The result of the debate was}}} '''move'''. &mdash;[[User:Nightstallion|<span style="font-variant:small-caps">Nightst</span>]]<font color="green">[[User:Nightstallion/esperanza|<span style="font-variant:small-caps">a</span>]]</font>[[User:Nightstallion|<span style="font-variant:small-caps">llion</span>]] [[User talk:Nightstallion|''(?)'']] 14:53, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
 ==Requested move==
 * [[James E. West]] → '''[[James E. West (politician)]]''' — This no longer serves being the main name, when there are several people for the same name — [[Talk:James E. West]] — [[User:Kintetsubuffalo|Chris]] 00:52, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
@@ Line 41: / Line 43: @@
 As there are two James E. Wests, and as both are of import to different groups of people, I have requested to the moderators to move this page to "James E. West (politician)". Not worried about who's more notable, more about both being notable enough to have their subject mentioned in the title of their article, as per Wikipedia policy. [[User:Kintetsubuffalo|Chris]] 00:58, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
+:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  <font color="red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</font> Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.</div><!-- Template:pollbottom -->
-==second proposal for move==