Jump to content

Muzzle brake: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Yaf (talk | contribs)
m rv (a defunct law is more appropriate here than an expired law)
CynicalMe (talk | contribs)
Line 16: Line 16:
== Legality ==
== Legality ==


[[Muzzle brake]]s were ruled "legal" by the [[BATF]] in the United States a short time after the now defunct [[Federal assault weapons ban]] went into effect in 1994. These muzzle attachments were legal to attach to a threaded barrel, so long as it was welded in place. On the other hand, [[flash suppressor]]s, and barrel shrouds were seen as 'military' features, and were on the list of features that, provided enough features were also present on the semi-automatic rifle, then the rifle was defined as illegal, if manufactured after the effective date of the ban. This meant, in practice, muzzle brakes had to be certified by the BATF to prevent end-users from accidentally violating the law and installing a device that could later be found to be defined legally as being more of a flash suppressor than a muzzle brake, even if marketed and sold as a muzzle brake, if incidental flash suppression was deemed to be 'significant' by the BATF. The Federal laws governing this sunsetted in 2004, and are no longer of concern, except in those few jurisdictions in which state law has still retained certain provisions of the earlier and now defunct Federal law.
[[Muzzle brake]]s were ruled "legal" by the [[BATF]] in the United States a short time after the now defunct [[Federal assault weapons ban]] went into effect in 1994. These muzzle attachments were legal to attach to a threaded barrel, so long as it was welded in place (silver solder also suffices). On the other hand, [[flash suppressor]]s, and barrel shrouds were seen as 'military' features, and were on the list of features that, provided enough features were also present on the semi-automatic rifle, then the rifle was defined as illegal, if manufactured after the effective date of the ban. This meant, in practice, muzzle brakes had to be certified by the BATF to prevent end-users from accidentally violating the law and installing a device that could later be found to be defined legally as being more of a flash suppressor than a muzzle brake, even if marketed and sold as a muzzle brake, if incidental flash suppression was deemed to be 'significant' by the BATF. The Federal laws governing this sunsetted in 2004, and are no longer in effect. However, individual states have, and may still pass their own laws regulating their use.


[[de:Mündungsbremse]]
[[de:Mündungsbremse]]

Revision as of 19:56, 11 June 2006

The muzzle brake of the 105 mm gun on an AMX 10 RC fighting vehicle.
Flash suppressor of the Sig 550 rifle. Flash suppressors are often designed to work as simple muzzle brakes.
The S&W Model 500 features a muzzle brake.

A muzzle brake or compensator is a device that is fitted to the muzzle of a firearm or cannon to redirect propellant gases with the effect of countering both recoil of the gun and unwanted rising of the barrel during rapid fire. Muzzle brakes are very useful for combat and timed competition shooting, and are commonly found on rifles firing very large cartridges (often big-game rifles), as well as some artillery and tank guns. They are also commonly used on pistols for practical pistol competitions, and are usually called compensators in this context. On the AKM assault rifle, the brake is angled slightly to the right to counteract the sideways movement of the gun under recoil.

Concept

Muzzle brakes are simple in concept. One of the simplest designs can be found on U.S. 90 mm tank guns. This consists of a small length of tubing mounted at right angles to the end of the barrel. Brakes most often utilize slots, vents, holes, baffles, and similar devices to redirect and control the burst of combustion gasses that follows the departure of a projectile. Another method, called porting involves ports or holes in the barrel near the muzzle that vent gas prior to the departure of the bullet. A third method involves slowing the departure of combustion gasses rather than redirection. Slowing of the gasses is the method used on Suppressors and linear compensators. In conventional designs, combustion gasses depart the brake at an angle to the bore. This counteracts the rearward movement of the barrel due to recoil as well as the upward rise of the muzzle. The effect can be compared to reverse thrust systems on aircraft jet engines.) The mass and velocity of the gasses is significant enough to move the firearm in the opposite direction of recoil.

Utility

There are advantages and disadvantages to muzzle brakes. Recoil is a subjective concept. One shooter may perceive it as pain, another as movement of the sights, and another as rearward thrust. Recoil energy can be sharp if the impulse is fast or may be considered soft even if the same total energy is transferred. Though there are numerous ways of measuring the energy of a recoil impulse, it's generally true that between 10% and 50% reductions can be measured. One of the primary advantages of a muzzle brake is the reduction of muzzle rise. This allows a weapons sights to be realigned quicker. This is relevant particularly for fully automatic weapons. Muzzle rise is often entirely eliminated by an efficient design. Because the rifle moves rearward less, the shooter has little to compensate for. This is particularly true of rapid-fire, fully-automatic fire, and large-bore hunting rifles.

The disadvantages of a muzzle brake are many. Escaping gas creates four effects: noise, pressure, blast, and flash. Noise increase is necessary to most designs because higher velocity gases impart more energy to counteract recoil. Higher velocity produces greater noise. Pressure is felt as a shock wave similar to that made by an explosion. The blast is the physical movement of air. This has the effect of blowing up dust and debris from below and to the sides of the brake. Finally, flash is increased as the high pressure gasses mix slowly with surrounding air, staying hot enough to glow for a longer period of time.

Muzzle brakes on both small arms and artillery can cause escaping gases to throw up dust clouds, impairing the firer's visibility and revealing his position. Troops often wet the ground in front of antitank guns in defensive emplacements to prevent this.

Legality

Muzzle brakes were ruled "legal" by the BATF in the United States a short time after the now defunct Federal assault weapons ban went into effect in 1994. These muzzle attachments were legal to attach to a threaded barrel, so long as it was welded in place (silver solder also suffices). On the other hand, flash suppressors, and barrel shrouds were seen as 'military' features, and were on the list of features that, provided enough features were also present on the semi-automatic rifle, then the rifle was defined as illegal, if manufactured after the effective date of the ban. This meant, in practice, muzzle brakes had to be certified by the BATF to prevent end-users from accidentally violating the law and installing a device that could later be found to be defined legally as being more of a flash suppressor than a muzzle brake, even if marketed and sold as a muzzle brake, if incidental flash suppression was deemed to be 'significant' by the BATF. The Federal laws governing this sunsetted in 2004, and are no longer in effect. However, individual states have, and may still pass their own laws regulating their use.