User talk:Older and ... well older: Difference between revisions
m Signing comment by Rguyah2 - "" |
m Robot: Archiving 1 thread (older than 7d) to User talk:Celestra/Archive 3. |
||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
:Please help with the Second Amendment. We are at an impasse. Grahamboat and North8000 seem to reject the NYT, the Library of Congress, and the Congressional Research Service as reliable sources for the proposition that I've never seen contradicted -- that from 1942-2000, the federal judiciary took the "collective view," rather than the individual view. I know you respect the reliability of these sources. Before we seek mediation, I'm hoping you can lend some common sense here.[[User:GreekParadise|GreekParadise]] ([[User talk:GreekParadise|talk]]) 06:19, 30 January 2013 (UTC) |
:Please help with the Second Amendment. We are at an impasse. Grahamboat and North8000 seem to reject the NYT, the Library of Congress, and the Congressional Research Service as reliable sources for the proposition that I've never seen contradicted -- that from 1942-2000, the federal judiciary took the "collective view," rather than the individual view. I know you respect the reliability of these sources. Before we seek mediation, I'm hoping you can lend some common sense here.[[User:GreekParadise|GreekParadise]] ([[User talk:GreekParadise|talk]]) 06:19, 30 January 2013 (UTC) |
||
| ⚫ | |||
== Thank you! == |
|||
I thought the user is anonymously editing others edits [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AJohn_Cena&diff=579391318&oldid=579348299 here]. Thank you so much for letting me know the fact! -- [[User:LogX|<font color="#00CED1" style="font-family:Polo" size="3">'''L''' o g</font>]] [[User talk:LogX|<font color="#FF0000" style="font-family:Polo;" size="3.5">'''X'''</font>]] 13:55, 30 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited [[Raymond Loewy]], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page [[Wheels]] ([[tools:~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Raymond_Loewy|check to confirm]] | [[tools:~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Raymond_Loewy|fix with Dab solver]]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the [[User:DPL bot/Dablink notification FAQ|FAQ]]{{*}} Join us at the [[Wikipedia:Disambiguation pages with links|DPL WikiProject]].</small> |
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited [[Raymond Loewy]], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page [[Wheels]] ([[tools:~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Raymond_Loewy|check to confirm]] | [[tools:~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Raymond_Loewy|fix with Dab solver]]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the [[User:DPL bot/Dablink notification FAQ|FAQ]]{{*}} Join us at the [[Wikipedia:Disambiguation pages with links|DPL WikiProject]].</small> |
||
Revision as of 07:53, 16 November 2013
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Hey there, I wanted to let you know that I submitted the edit you requested for the origin of transgender. Thank you for your assistance! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ehipassiko (talk • contribs) 17:19, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
Economics and politics are directly related. I posted a well referenced section on economics in Gun Politics and you, dliigencedude and Grahamboat decided that you didn't like the sources, like the UN treaty on the black market manufacturing and sales of firearms (which addresses political firearm issues in the States), and deleted the section. Why would I have anything to do with a group of people who censor the reality of the relationship between economics and politics because of their own ideology? Wikipedia has a crap reputation for accuracy because of ideological censorship and the deliberate insertion of false material based on ideology. Go ahead, censor all you want. Eliminate anyone whose material invades your little fantasy ideology. Why would I ever even bother to contribute again? Censor me, I would rather be censored than live in a fantasy. Impey Barbicane ~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Impey Barbicane (talk • contribs) 22:39, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
Please review my proposals for revisions to the lede (lead?) for the Second Amendment article and comment on them on the talk page. Or, if you prefer, respond to me on my talk page if you think we should discuss it further prior to your comment. Thanks!GreekParadise (talk) 20:36, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
- Please help with the Second Amendment. We are at an impasse. Grahamboat and North8000 seem to reject the NYT, the Library of Congress, and the Congressional Research Service as reliable sources for the proposition that I've never seen contradicted -- that from 1942-2000, the federal judiciary took the "collective view," rather than the individual view. I know you respect the reliability of these sources. Before we seek mediation, I'm hoping you can lend some common sense here.GreekParadise (talk) 06:19, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 6
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Raymond Loewy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wheels (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
technology have come a long way. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rguyah2 (talk • contribs) 13:13, 12 November 2013 (UTC)