User talk:89.139.177.244

Blocked

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 Monate for disruptive editing. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

You weren't blocked for block evading, you were blocked because you've been warned and blocked about this multiple times before, and yet you're still doing the same things wrong. (WP:POV-pushing, making changes without consensus, etc.) There's no "3 strikes and you're out" mentality when you've gotten this many warnings not do to this. Sergecross73 msg me 20:08, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

I'm really not sure what I did wrong. What's wrong with writing in an article's talk page why I think it should be removed from some category? Am I pushing my views? Sure, as are those who think that cartoons can be art (and, for that matter, everyone else who writes in Wikipedia's talk pages). Only in my case, my views are actually supported by scholarly consensus (rather than on "someone wrote in some website that it's an art film, therefore it's an art film") and based upon an actual, careful understanding of what art cinema is rather than on "if someone writes on some website that X is an art film, it's an art film."