User talk:Leadingbrand: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 01:32, 21 June 2006

Image Tagging Image:Seanmcd.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Seanmcd.jpg. The image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{fairusein|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. -- Carnildo 18:13, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:Hochuli.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Hochuli.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:42, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 7: / Line 7: @@
-== [[Cyrus Farivar]] Reloaded==
-Hi, I'm a relatively new user reopening this issue: The following comments are a reply to [[User: Morton_devonshire|Morton devonshire]], who questioned my notability tag (and I suspect, removed the tag from the Farivar page without either addressing the issue, or knowing the background. Sorry to clog your page quoting my comments in full but I see that Vfd, notability tags and other stuff mysteriously disappear from the Farivar page. Perhaps delete all this later? I think it's important for WKP that this issue be decided and a legitimate majority view be carried:
-Hi, thanks for your prompt feedback. I don't feel you addressed my reasons for tagging the page, and these reasons are not affected by what happened last year (I have read up a lot of the past discussion, but I'm not at all convinced). On consideration, I feel the Cyrus Farivar page will eventually go as it is clearly:
-decidedly NOT notable - the subject is not notable in himself, and greenlighting was NOT a notable hoax
-the count of the last deletion vote (Aug '05) came down firmly on the side of 'delete' - how does this come to mean 'keep'?
-mainly based on a trivial subject - a non-event, in fact
-a page intended as a self-promotional tool, rather than to be informational
-refers almost entirely to itself - no importance in the wider world
-a bad precedent
-The issue of CF 'criticising' WKP is simply begging the question, I wasn't aware that he did so. I note that my notability tag has been removed without any notability being added. I am determined to have a debate about this page on principle, and if notability is not discussed, will take it further. I'm also confident that if I take the discussion wider, I will find reasonable support for my stance.
-Further, I am aware from my background reading that past raisings of this issue have disappeared. See Mrtourne's comments during the Aug '05 deletion discussion.
-I should add that I am also going to push for the related 'Greenlighting hoax' page to be merged to 'hoaxes'. Again, it is extremely trivial, and almost entirely self-referential.
-I would draw your attention also to the following comment by user Snowspinner (during Aug '05 deletion discussion).
-Quote: Keep. I don't care if it was vanity created, it is a notable subject. In fact, I will go a step further. This article is being kept. I do not care what the outcome of the usual VfD suspects straw poll is. The article is being kept, and I will undelete it until the arbcom or Jimbo tells me to stop. Snowspinner 21:34, August 1, 2005 (UTC) End quote
-I note also that the announcement of the result of the Aug '05 deletion vote being a 'keep' was made by the same user Snowspinner. As a new user, I respectfully suggest that he made a bad counting error. As I am a new editor, maybe I am missing some procedural convention?
-My suggestion is that the page be deleted, and perhaps userfy-ed.
-Centrepull 15:59, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
 ==Image Tagging for [[:Image:Hochuli.jpg]]==
 Thanks for uploading '''[[:Image:Hochuli.jpg]]'''. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images.  If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days.  If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.