User talk:Scientizzle

Welcome!

Please leave new comments at the bottom of the page. You can click here to add a new message at the bottom of my talk page... Don't forget to sign your posts with "~~~~"! I can no longer contribute to Wikipedia like I used to...this is a good thing: life in the real world is keeping me very busy, with important new research to perform. As such, I may not be very responsive to messages here. -- Scientizzle Directory: Archives March 2006 – July 2006 August 2006 – October 2006 November 2006 – April 2007 May 2007 – September 2007 October 2007 – May 2008 May 2008 – July 2009 August 2009 – Nomination of ApothéCure Inc. for deletion A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ApothéCure Inc. is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ApothéCure Inc. until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Fbifriday (talk) 11:51, 3 March 2013 (UTC) The Wikipedia Library now offering accounts from Cochrane Collaboration (sign up!) Cochrane Collaboration is an independent medical nonprofit organization consisting of over 28,000 volunteers in more than 100 countries. The collaboration was formed to organize medical scholarship in a systematic way in the interests of evidence-based research: the group conducts systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials of health-care interventions, which it then publishes in the Cochrane Library. Cochrane has generously agreed to give free, full-access accounts to 100 medical editors. Individual access would otherwise cost between $300 and $800 per account. Thank you Cochrane! If you are stil active as a medical editor, come and sign up :) Cheers, Ocaasi t | c 19:50, 16 June 2013 (UTC) Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Human Genetic History#Guidelines desperately needed. Thanks. Dougweller (talk) 13:26, 2 July 2013 (UTC) The Wikipedia Library now offering accounts from Cochrane Collaboration (sign up!) The Wikipedia Library gets Wikipedia editors free access to reliable sources that are behind paywalls. Because you are signed on as a medical editor, I thought you'd want to know about our most recent donation from Cochrane Collaboration. Cochrane Collaboration is an independent medical nonprofit organization that conducts systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials of health-care interventions, which it then publishes in the Cochrane Library. Cochrane has generously agreed to give free, full-access accounts to 100 medical editors. Individual access would otherwise cost between $300 and $800 per account. If you are still active as a medical editor, come and sign up :) Cheers, Ocaasi t | c 20:35, 16 June 2013 (UTC) Hi I'm sending this message in regards to a certain article you created a while ago on wikipedia that no longer exists. I think it was written as a joke or perhaps you had another reason in mind. It was about a common acquaintance of ours; her name is Marta. She recently found out by accident that this article had been backed-up on a site called speedydeletion. She was a little worried about it, even though you possibly had good intentions and you thought it would be funny or something. I think I have the right person here, so please contact me back, or even better, contact her and explain what all of this was about. Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wickedmike (talk • contribs) 14:23, 16 July 2013 (UTC) I haven't the foggiest idea what you're talking about. It's possible I deleted an article that was a joke or otherwise inappropriate vandalism, but I'm not one to create something like that. Wikipedia can't really control the content of some other site, so you'd have to take it up with them. Without more information, I can't point you in the right direction for anything on Wikipedia. What was the actual name of the article? — Scientizzle 14:34, 16 July 2013 (UTC) Sorry to waste your time. speedydeletion pointed me in your direction, it probably got the wrong metadata for the article. It didn't quite fit your profile, but I decided to give it a try anyway. I checked out the deletion log and found out that it was someone else who created it, and my friend identified the user name as belonging to a distant friend of hers. Again, really sorry for this. She was pretty worried so I just wanted to get to the bottom of it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wickedmike (talk • contribs) 14:55, 16 July 2013 (UTC) Hamid Aboutalebi Hi, I noticed that you added some unfounded claims about Hamid Aboutalebi to his Article in Wikipedia, what you have added is some claims from some newspapers without any legal affiliation. Since this article is a sort of biography as identified by wikipedia and items with poor resources should be immediately removed i tried to remove it a couple of times thinking it might have been a mistake but if it continues i will report it to the board of wikipedia. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cherabtidare (talk • contribs) 17:23, 8 April 2014 (UTC) Hamid Aboutalebi is a new article that will get a lot of attention based on reports such as these from major international news sources: [1][2][3][4]. Keeping that information out by violating WP:3RR isn't going to work... — Scientizzle 17:32, 8 April 2014 (UTC) Hi thanks for editing the article looks fare now — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cherabtidare (talk • contribs) 18:16, 8 April 2014 (UTC)