Jump to content

Wikipedia:Page-move war: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Pathore (talk | contribs)
→‎Dealing with page move wars: that could have been read as "stop ... trying to get a consensus"; fixed
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Shortcut|WP:PMW}}
{{essay|WP:PMW}}
{{essay}}
A '''[[Help:Moving a page|page move]] war''' is a struggle between two or more editors (similar to an [[Wikipedia:Edit war|edit war]], however, on the page name).
A '''[[Help:Moving a page|page move]] war''' is a struggle between two or more editors (similar to an [[Wikipedia:Edit war|edit war]], however, on the page name).



Revision as of 17:52, 9 May 2015

A page move war is a struggle between two or more editors (similar to an edit war, however, on the page name).

What is wrong with page move wars

Page moves are not tug of war!

Wikipedia holds that an open system can produce quality, neutral encyclopedic content. This requires reasoned negotiation, patience,[1] and a strong community spirit, each of which is undercut by antisocial behavior like incivility and move warring.

Besides this, page move wars create a lot of double or even triple redirects in some cases; this is a bad thing because these redirects confuse those who are not much familiar with the MediaWiki software. Following these redirects is like going around in circles. Double redirects are also bad for server performance. Although one shouldn't worry about performance, it's not an excuse to move war.

Dealing with page move wars

The right way to deal with page name disputes is to stop moving the page and try to get a consensus on the talk page of the article. If you think a page move might be controversial, its best to make a move proposal on the article's talk page and list it at requested moves. In case of persistent move wars, administrators may block or move protect the subject page until the page name dispute is resolved.

See also

References