Talk:German invasion of Belgium (1940): Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
Line 60: | Line 60: | ||
141 divisions? I don't think so! --[[Special:Contributions/41.150.168.21|41.150.168.21]] ([[User talk:41.150.168.21|talk]]) 14:06, 21 April 2015 (UTC) |
141 divisions? I don't think so! --[[Special:Contributions/41.150.168.21|41.150.168.21]] ([[User talk:41.150.168.21|talk]]) 14:06, 21 April 2015 (UTC) |
||
:Your thoughts are irrelevant. [[User:Dapi89|Dapi89]] ([[User talk:Dapi89|talk]]) 12:12, 1 May 2016 (UTC) |
|||
==Last Defensive Battles== |
==Last Defensive Battles== |
Revision as of 12:12, 1 May 2016
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the German invasion of Belgium (1940) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
German invasion of Belgium (1940) has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||||||
German invasion of Belgium (1940) is part of the Belgium in World War II series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This article is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on May 28, 2013. |
Belgian forces
"The AéMI possessed 250 combat aircraft, of which 90 were fighter aircraft, 12 were bombers and 12 were reconnaissance aircraft. Only 50 were of reasonably modern standard.[42][43] When including liaison and transport aircraft, a total strength of 377 is reached;[48]" This math doesn't fit. Could someone with access to the sources please clarify ? (114 fighter,bombers and recons but 250 combat aircraft excluding transports ?) 217.235.13.103 (talk) 21:54, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
- These figures come from two different sources, so Frieser is not going to fit perfectly. All aircraft were seconded by the military. 250 is the original figure. The remaining military aircraft (130+ left) has been added to machines possessed by the naval component/civilian elements etc. Dapi89 (talk) 10:36, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
Luxemburg
Hello, I have included Luxembourg in the infobox since its invasion can certainly be seen as part of the Battle of Belgium. If anyone disagrees, I'd be interested to hear your thoughts.Brigade Piron (talk) 08:20, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
Citation problems
There's citations for the following but no such books are listed in the bibliography:
- Foot 2005 (probably Dear & Foot, The Oxford Companion to World War II)
- Harclerode
- Tugwell
- Cull 1999 -- Diannaa (talk) 01:03, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
- They're not mine, but to my belief, they represent:
- I agree that Foot is probably "The Oxford Companion to World War II"
- "Harclerode" is Wings of War: Airborne Warfare 1918-1945
- There are several possible Tugwells, so if you leave it, I'll try to replace it with another source
- This is certainly Twelve Days in May [1]
- This is the risk with using the old form of citations I suppose. Thank you very much for your work here! Brigade Piron (talk) 07:07, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
German strength (for Belgium)
141 divisions? I don't think so! --41.150.168.21 (talk) 14:06, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
- Your thoughts are irrelevant. Dapi89 (talk) 12:12, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Last Defensive Battles
Shouldn't most of this information be transferred to the Battle of the Lys article, with the section here offering a link? 2602:306:C53C:C0E0:2954:44A6:3A12:4111 (talk) 10:40, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
- Wikipedia good articles
- Warfare good articles
- GA-Class Featured topics articles
- Wikipedia featured topics Belgium in World War II good content
- Low-importance Featured topics articles
- GA-Class military history articles
- GA-Class British military history articles
- British military history task force articles
- GA-Class Dutch military history articles
- Dutch military history task force articles
- GA-Class European military history articles
- European military history task force articles
- GA-Class French military history articles
- French military history task force articles
- GA-Class German military history articles
- German military history task force articles
- GA-Class World War II articles
- World War II task force articles
- GA-Class Germany articles
- High-importance Germany articles
- WikiProject Germany articles
- GA-Class France articles
- High-importance France articles
- All WikiProject France pages
- GA-Class United Kingdom articles
- Low-importance United Kingdom articles
- WikiProject United Kingdom articles
- GA-Class Belgium-related articles
- High-importance Belgium-related articles
- All WikiProject Belgium pages
- Selected anniversaries (May 2013)