Jump to content

Talk:John of Islay, Earl of Ross: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Kingbotk (talk | contribs)
Template replacement, Replaced: {{BioWikiProject → {{WPBiography,
Rcpaterson (talk | contribs)
Prose
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Template:Medieval Scotland|class=B|importance=High}}
{{Template:Medieval Scotland|class=B|importance=High}}
{{WPBiography|importance=Mid|class=B|needs-infobox=yes}}
{{WPBiography|importance=Mid|class=B|needs-infobox=yes}}

== Prose ==

I have always subscribed to George Orwell's contention that good prose should should be like a window pane, allowing a message to be conveyed with absolute clarity; there is nothing worse than bad English in the masquerade of pseudo-scholarship. I have made an attempt here to convey the essential facts on the subject with as much clarity and precision as I can. If anyone thinks they can do better by all means have a go-I will certainly not stand in their way. But what I do resent-and ''deeply'' so-are unconstructive and petty-minded tags. Those unhappy with the 'tone' of the present article are quite welcome to 'resurrect' the corpse in its original form.
[[User:Rcpaterson|Rcpaterson]] 03:09, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 03:09, 27 August 2006

WikiProject iconBiography B‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
BThis article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Note icon
An appropriate infobox may need to be added to this article. Please refer to the list of biography infoboxes for further information.

Prose

I have always subscribed to George Orwell's contention that good prose should should be like a window pane, allowing a message to be conveyed with absolute clarity; there is nothing worse than bad English in the masquerade of pseudo-scholarship. I have made an attempt here to convey the essential facts on the subject with as much clarity and precision as I can. If anyone thinks they can do better by all means have a go-I will certainly not stand in their way. But what I do resent-and deeply so-are unconstructive and petty-minded tags. Those unhappy with the 'tone' of the present article are quite welcome to 'resurrect' the corpse in its original form. Rcpaterson 03:09, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]