Jump to content

Talk:Public image of Rudy Giuliani: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Notification of altered sources needing review #IABot
→‎Puff piece?: new section
Line 34: Line 34:


Cheers.—[[User:Cyberbot II|<sup style="color:green;font-family:Courier">cyberbot II]]<small><sub style="margin-left:-14.9ex;color:green;font-family:Comic Sans MS">[[User talk:Cyberbot II|<span style="color:green">Talk to my owner]]:Online</sub></small> 16:06, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Cheers.—[[User:Cyberbot II|<sup style="color:green;font-family:Courier">cyberbot II]]<small><sub style="margin-left:-14.9ex;color:green;font-family:Comic Sans MS">[[User talk:Cyberbot II|<span style="color:green">Talk to my owner]]:Online</sub></small> 16:06, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

== Puff piece? ==

Given the negative press he's received around the topic of Secretary of State nomination, this article reads like a puff piece curated by Giuliani enthusiasts. Anybody care to inject some perspective and recent news? [[User:Erxnmedia|Erxnmedia]] ([[User talk:Erxnmedia|talk]]) 14:47, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:47, 20 November 2016

Please add {{WikiProject banner shell}} to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconConservatism C‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
CThis article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
NiedrigThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

"Part of a series on" navbox

Regarding a sidebar navigation aid listing politician's bio, article about political positions, etc., some editors find such a template user friendly, others clunky/superfluous. In my opinion, the one for Sarah Palin-related articles, Template:SarahPalinSegmentsUnderInfoBox, is quite attractive; Mitt's, Template:Mitt Romney series not so much. In any case and for what it's worth, here's a breakdown compiled from Category:Public image of American politicians:

  1. Public image of Rudy Giuliani - used (It was just put back here; Template:Rudy Giuliani had been removed everywhere it previously had been placed.)
  2. Public image of George W. Bush - not used
  3. Public image of Mike Huckabee - not used
  4. Cultural and political image of John McCain - used
  5. George McGovern in popular culture - not used
  6. Public image of Barack Obama - used
  7. Public image of Sarah Palin - used
  8. Public image of Mitt Romney - used (but not on all Romney-related articles)
  9. Criticism of Franklin D. Roosevelt - not used
Thoughts?--Hodgson-Burnett's Secret Garden (talk) 00:13, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Problems

This page clearly needs to be amended. The "Philosophy" section is basically a discussion of whether religion should play a role in governing. It does not cover any broader subjects. Several links are broken. Some of it seems biased. A lot of it is highlighting things that were minor at the time or expanding negative viewpoints. I'm not going to fix it completely, but somebody should really put in some research and fix this up. --Bobjohnson111980 (talk) 05:24, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Public image of Rudy Giuliani. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 16:06, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Puff piece?

Given the negative press he's received around the topic of Secretary of State nomination, this article reads like a puff piece curated by Giuliani enthusiasts. Anybody care to inject some perspective and recent news? Erxnmedia (talk) 14:47, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]