Jump to content

User talk:Taeyebar: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Undid revision 797244417 by Taeyebar (talk)
Line 10: Line 10:
|archive = User talk:Taeyebar/Archive %(counter)d
|archive = User talk:Taeyebar/Archive %(counter)d
}}
}}

== Disruptive editing ==

[[Image:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|left|alt=|link=]] Your recent editing history at [[Snow White and the Huntsman]] and others shows that you are currently engaged in an [[WP:EDITWAR|edit war]]. '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being [[WP:BLOCK|blocked from editing]]'''—especially if you violate the [[WP:3RR|three-revert rule]], which states that an editor must not perform more than three [[WP:REVERT|reverts]] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's [[WP:TALK|talk page]] to work toward making a version that represents [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. See [[WP:BRD|BRD]] for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant [[Wikipedia:Noticeboards|noticeboard]] or seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary [[Wikipedia:Protection policy|page protection]].

As you've been told before, [[WP:FILMLEAD]], which says ''Genre classifications should comply with [[WP:WEIGHT]] and represent what is specified by a majority of mainstream reliable sources.'' Most sources call this film a fantasy, not a "high fantasy". You've been told this many times before. Claiming authority from another guideline that has nothing to do with films or genres does not entitle you to ignore the clear intent of WP:FILMLEAD. Get consensus or leave it alone. You also need to stop your [[WP:STALKING]] on numerous pages.

I'm also restoring the warning from [[User:TenTonParasol]] that you deleted below. You should pay attention to it and stop your persistent [[WP:Disruptive editing]]. - [[User:Gothicfilm|Gothicfilm]] ([[User talk:Gothicfilm|talk]]) 23:33, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

== June 2017 ==

As a third and uninvolved party, I'm going to firmly warn: systematically undoing Gothicfilm's edits as part of an announced vendetta sparked by an unrelated issue is unconstructive battleground behavior (see [[WP:BATTLEGROUND]]). If you have a particular issue about the removal of genre categories across multiple pages, I suggest you take it up in a discussion somewhere, perhaps [[WT:FILM]], to gain a consensus. This reverting literally every edit Gothicfilm makes is not going to build a reasonable consensus or support the solidity of your edits in any way. You've been around a long time, so I'll be frank: this kind of behavior often leads to unpleasant noticeboards. I very much suggest you desist in favor of discussion at a centralized location. ~Cheers, [[User:TenTonParasol|<span style="color:DarkGreen;">Ten</span>]][[User talk:TenTonParasol|<span style="color:MediumSeaGreen;">Ton</span>]][[Special:Contributions/TenTonParasol|<span style="color:LightGreen;">Parasol</span>]] 00:17, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

Revision as of 23:33, 30 August 2017

Template:Education wikibreak

File:Kylo Ren cosplayer (22969075254).jpg
Kylo Ren cosplayer (22969075254)

Disruptive editing

Your recent editing history at Snow White and the Huntsman and others shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

As you've been told before, WP:FILMLEAD, which says Genre classifications should comply with WP:WEIGHT and represent what is specified by a majority of mainstream reliable sources. Most sources call this film a fantasy, not a "high fantasy". You've been told this many times before. Claiming authority from another guideline that has nothing to do with films or genres does not entitle you to ignore the clear intent of WP:FILMLEAD. Get consensus or leave it alone. You also need to stop your WP:STALKING on numerous pages.

I'm also restoring the warning from User:TenTonParasol that you deleted below. You should pay attention to it and stop your persistent WP:Disruptive editing. - Gothicfilm (talk) 23:33, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

June 2017

As a third and uninvolved party, I'm going to firmly warn: systematically undoing Gothicfilm's edits as part of an announced vendetta sparked by an unrelated issue is unconstructive battleground behavior (see WP:BATTLEGROUND). If you have a particular issue about the removal of genre categories across multiple pages, I suggest you take it up in a discussion somewhere, perhaps WT:FILM, to gain a consensus. This reverting literally every edit Gothicfilm makes is not going to build a reasonable consensus or support the solidity of your edits in any way. You've been around a long time, so I'll be frank: this kind of behavior often leads to unpleasant noticeboards. I very much suggest you desist in favor of discussion at a centralized location. ~Cheers, TenTonParasol 00:17, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]