Jump to content

Wikipedia:Proposed naming conventions (Catholic Church): Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Line 12: Line 12:


==Working out a central point of reference==
==Working out a central point of reference==
{{Shortcut|WP:EIUSRELIGIO}}
It is suggested that this policy document is updated taking into a account a few previous essays and likes: [[User:Vaquero100/CC vs. RCC]], [[User:Pseudo-Richard/Names of the Catholic Church]], and [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Catholicism/Terminology]]. As for arguments for "Roman Catholic" , there is [[Wikipedia:Catholic or Roman Catholic?]].
It is suggested that this policy document is updated taking into a account a few previous essays and likes: [[User:Vaquero100/CC vs. RCC]], [[User:Pseudo-Richard/Names of the Catholic Church]], and [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Catholicism/Terminology]]. As for arguments for "Roman Catholic" , there is [[Wikipedia:Catholic or Roman Catholic?]].

From extensive research on this naming issue in the related talk pages throughout the years, perhaps an equivalent of a "[[cuius regio, eius religio]]" style policy would bring about most harmony over time, thus tolerating a level of dissonance: articles pertaining to the Catholic Church may retain their "Catholic" terminological integrity, while articles pertaing to other denominations may apply their preferred terms e.g. "Roman Catholic". Example: [[Catholic Church of England and Wales]] may employ "Catholic" in title and content, while [[Church of England]] employ "Roman Catholic" in reference to the same entity in its respective text content.

After years of significant contetion, for the time due it seems the spirit of the [[Peace of Augsburg]] (1555) could perhaps inspire more harmony also digitally on Wikipedia for constructive editing rather repetitions ad nauseum of arguments throughout talkpages, lacking a hitherto central point of reference?


==Guidelines==
==Guidelines==

Revision as of 15:13, 11 October 2017

These naming conventions regarding the Catholic Church is a collection of guidelines on how to name Wikipedia articles about the Catholic Church, as well as associated people and entities. It is offered as a central point of reference. For articles' respective very text contents, please refer to Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Catholic Church.

The guiding principles of naming articles relating to the Catholic Church are as follows, in order of relative priority:

  1. Follow all general Wikipedia policies, including the policies on Wikipedia:Article titles (WP:Concise), WP:Neutral point of view, WP:No original research, and WP:Verifiability, as perceived through WP:Consensus
  2. Subject to WP:Consistency for convienience

Working out a central point of reference

It is suggested that this policy document is updated taking into a account a few previous essays and likes: User:Vaquero100/CC vs. RCC, User:Pseudo-Richard/Names of the Catholic Church, and Wikipedia:WikiProject Catholicism/Terminology. As for arguments for "Roman Catholic" , there is Wikipedia:Catholic or Roman Catholic?.

From extensive research on this naming issue in the related talk pages throughout the years, perhaps an equivalent of a "cuius regio, eius religio" style policy would bring about most harmony over time, thus tolerating a level of dissonance: articles pertaining to the Catholic Church may retain their "Catholic" terminological integrity, while articles pertaing to other denominations may apply their preferred terms e.g. "Roman Catholic". Example: Catholic Church of England and Wales may employ "Catholic" in title and content, while Church of England employ "Roman Catholic" in reference to the same entity in its respective text content.

After years of significant contetion, for the time due it seems the spirit of the Peace of Augsburg (1555) could perhaps inspire more harmony also digitally on Wikipedia for constructive editing rather repetitions ad nauseum of arguments throughout talkpages, lacking a hitherto central point of reference?

Guidelines

The universal Catholic Church

Articles that apply to the Catholic Church in general should use the phrase "Catholic Church" or the adjective "Catholic". Such articles should be recognisable, natural, precise, concise, and consistent with other Catholic Church-related titles, and should reflect a neutral point of view. For example:

Catholicism

Articles that apply specifically to Catholic things, but not necessarily the entire Catholic Church, should use the phrase "Catholic". In some cases where confusion might arise because of the presence of multiple particular churches sui iuris the phrase Roman Catholic may be used as a disambiguator for the Latin Church based on local consensus.

The term Catholic or its derivatives such as Catholicism are appropriate when referring to organisations, doctrines, and practices that have a historical connection to the Catholic Church and/or Catholicism. For example:

The scope of the term Catholicism might differ from the term Catholic Church, in that Catholicism might be perceived as reflecting a broader spectra, including beyond that of the Catholic Church in an ecclesiological sense.

Particular churches sui iuris

Articles about Catholic particular churches sui iuris should use the full name. For example:

However, one exception is:

Latin Church

There has been active discussions on the names of entities related to the Latin Church. There is currently not an overarching consensus as to whether or not Roman Catholic should be used in reference to distinguish entities particular to the Latin Church, such as dioceses.

National polities

Examples:

Episcopal conferences

As for episcopal conferences - often but not always equivalent to sovereign national territories - the WP:Consistency is as follows:

Other alternatives have been refuted on the following grounds:

  • "Spanish Episcopal Conference": Because not all episcopal conferences follow one nation, and it would be inconvenient to name all of these as adjectives
  • "Bishops Conference", "Bishop's Conference", "Bishops' Conference": Too much inconsistency

Dioceses

Notably, for article names of Catholic dioceses, particularly those located in historically Catholic-minority, Christian regions, Roman Catholic is often used, though, consensus on its use seems unclear.

Individuals

Titles of articles relating to people should generally follow Wikipedia:Naming conventions (people). However, it is a recurrent practice within the Catholic Church to sometimes indicate leading figures with a prefix, for example:

Exceptionately also sobriquets apply, such as Albertus Magnus.

Saints follow MOS:SAINTS.

As for most cases in ordained people commonly referred to by their Latin names, this use is generelly discouraged, but rather their native name or its prevalent equivalent in English language is advocated.

Disambiguations

If necessary for disambiguation, articles that apply broadly to the whole Catholic Church should preferentially contain the ending in the Catholic Church. For example:

Redirects

However, disambiguation pages are also due:

Kategorien

Top: Category:Catholic Church.

There has been multiple cases of WP:Consensus for this WP:Consistency also in its subcategories, as indicated here, and in similar cases.

See also