Jump to content

User talk:Jeff3000: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Tag: MassMessage delivery
Notification: proposed deletion of File:Ca-map2.png. (TW)
Line 79: Line 79:
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}
<!-- Message sent by User:Xaosflux@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2017/Coordination/MMS/05&oldid=813459745 -->
<!-- Message sent by User:Xaosflux@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2017/Coordination/MMS/05&oldid=813459745 -->
== [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|Proposed deletion]] of [[:File:Ca-map2.png]] ==
[[File:Ambox warning yellow.svg|left|link=|48px|]]

The file [[:File:Ca-map2.png]] has been [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed for deletion]]&#32;because of the following concern:
<blockquote>Orphaned map.</blockquote>

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be [[WP:DEL#REASON|deleted for any of several reasons]].

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your [[Help:edit summary|edit summary]] or on [[File talk:Ca-map2.png|the file's talk page]].

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist. In particular, the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion]] process can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Files for discussion|files for discussion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ~ [[User:BU Rob13|<b>Rob</b><small><sub>13</sub></small>]]<sup style="margin-left:-1.0ex;">[[User talk:BU Rob13|Talk]]</sup> 13:52, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

Revision as of 13:52, 27 February 2018

Archive
Archives
Archive 1 2005-02-03 – 2006-03-08 Archive 2 2006-03-14 – 2006-07-12
Archive 3 2006-07-12 – 2006-09-22 Archive 4 2006-09-23 – 2006-12-04
Archive 5 2006-12-05 – 2007-06-19 Archive 6 2007-06-19 – 2007-12-03
Archive 7 2007-12-04 – 2009-01-06 Archive 8 2009-01-06 – 2010-01-17
Archive 9 2010-02-15 – 2011-07-28 Archive 10 2011-05-06 – 2014-01-12

Template:Bayanic Texts and scriptures listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:Bayanic Texts and scriptures. Since you had some involvement with the Template:Bayanic Texts and scriptures redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Smkolins (talk) 04:01, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I think I cleaned up all the old references to that name so the redirect doesn't need to exist any more. Right? --Smkolins (talk) 04:03, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Abraham may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • The [[Bahá'í Faith]]] sees Abraham as a [[Manifestation of God]], a term for a prophet. He is referred to in the [[Kitáb-

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:17, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chile2.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Chile2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 18:26, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe this #redirect should be discussed thoroughly

Hello, Jeff3000. You have new messages at Talk:Physical_entity.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

  M aurice  12:42, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:56, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:List of religious leaders in 2006 listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Talk:List of religious leaders in 2006. Since you had some involvement with the Talk:List of religious leaders in 2006 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. The Traditionalist (talk) 12:08, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Jeff3000. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Canada has been scheduled as today's featured article for July 1. I'd appreciate it if you could check the article one more time to make sure it's up-to-date. You're welcome to edit the main page text, but you're not under any obligation; I'll be trimming the text to roughly 1100 characters. Thanks! - Dank (push to talk) 00:33, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

citizen of the world from Canada

Thank you for quality articles such as Canada, celebrated today, for diligent help with page moves, redirects and disambiguation, for patiently explaining in edit summaries, - Jeff, you are an awesome Wikipedian!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:58, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WWIS listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wikipedia:WWIS. Since you had some involvement with the Wikipedia:WWIS redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 01:35, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Featured article review for Tahirih Justice Center

I have nominated Tahirih Justice Center for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. TheDragonFire (talk) 06:15, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Computer administrator listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Computer administrator. Since you had some involvement with the Computer administrator redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 02:29, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Jeff3000. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Ca-map2.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned map.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob13Talk 13:52, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]