Jump to content

User talk:Yesterdaysfire: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Notification: Your Articles for Creation submission has been declined (AFCH 0.9)
Line 101: Line 101:


[[User talk:Ravenswing|'''<span style="background:#7F00FF;color:#00FFFF"> '' Ravenswing '' </span>''']] 21:39, 1 March 2018 (UTC)</div><!--Template:Afc decline-->
[[User talk:Ravenswing|'''<span style="background:#7F00FF;color:#00FFFF"> '' Ravenswing '' </span>''']] 21:39, 1 March 2018 (UTC)</div><!--Template:Afc decline-->

== Your submission at [[WP:AFC|Articles for creation]]: Mordecai (Band) ==

<div style="border:solid 1px #57DB1E; background:#E6FFE6; padding:1em; padding-top:0.5em; padding-bottom:0.5em; width:20em; color:black; margin-bottom: 1.5em; margin-left: 1.5em; width: 90%;">[[File:AFC-Logo.svg|50px|left]] '''The article you submitted to Articles for creation has been created.'''<br />
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to [[Wikipedia]]. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can [[Wikipedia:Starting an article|create articles yourself]] without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for Creation]] if you prefer.
* If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the '''<span class="plainlinks">[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Yesterdaysfire help desk]</span>'''.
* If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider {{leave feedback/link|page=Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation|text=leaving us some feedback}}.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
[[User:Bindle-stiff|Bindle-stiff]] ([[User talk:Bindle-stiff|talk]]) 03:28, 12 March 2018 (UTC)</div><!--Template:Afc talk-->

Revision as of 03:28, 12 March 2018

Your submission at Articles for creation: yesterdaysfire (January 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 22:22, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Teahouse logo
Hello! Yesterdaysfire, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 22:22, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
David.moreno72 23:56, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Y La Bamba (Band) (January 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by BusterD was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
BusterD (talk) 13:07, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I appreciate your contacting me on talk. I'm not saying this isn't a worthy effort, and I'm not saying the work you've done is insufficient. As a page reviewer I have some discretion, but also have a responsibility to ensure the page I reviewed meets standards "hallowed" by practice and consensus. In this overlong message I hope to give you some insight.
  • First, I can't review your page by comparing it to other less worthy efforts. I didn't see those other band pages (I can only be so many places at one time). If those pages are not strongly sourced, they might find themselves deleted. My task is to review THIS page with a mind towards improvement and prevent ITS deletion.
  • Second, I reviewed your page and found some text which was taken verbatim from the NPR source, though correctly cited. The quote from the same source is perfectly acceptable. I could have put the page up for speedy deletion because of the plagiarism. I felt this would be a disproportionate response. So I deleted the text and moved your cite. I wouldn't have touched your text if you had reworded it from the source text.
  • Third, there's no deadline here on Wikipedia. Just because the page isn't published now doesn't mean it won't be published.
  • Fourth and lastly, we SHOULD be discussing how to improve the page by additional sourcing. In the last few minutes, I found Inlander, OPB, Willamette Week, Noise and Color PDX, local PBS. This stuff is just out there and you should be using it upon which to improve the page. BusterD (talk) 16:17, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I hope I have better acquainted you with the way a reviewer works. Folks like myself are here to ensure this is an encyclopedia, not a random listing of local bands. I believe the subject about which you've written is likely to be included in Wikipedia; if not I wouldn't be chatting with you. Add a couple of the sources linked above and make the page something to be proud of. Now I want to know more about this band. Without sounding promotional, show the average reader why they should care. BusterD (talk) 16:17, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mordecai (Band) (January 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zawl was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Zawl 19:13, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chetsford was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Chetsford (talk) 04:37, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Y La Bamba (Band) (March 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ravenswing was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Ravenswing 21:39, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mordecai (Band)

The article you submitted to Articles for creation has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bindle-stiff (talk) 03:28, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]