Jump to content

User talk:Jimmyvanthach: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Rambot (talk | contribs)
Article Licensing
Jimmyvanthach (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:


Jimmy, I sincerely and personally regret that you have suffered personal abuse here. And I regret that VCML advocates are trying to abuse the Wikipedia to prop up their legitimacy. Both unfortunate situations are a discredit to the good name of Wikipedia, which ought to be both a community of goodwill and a reference worthy of respect. I will do all I can to encourage the discontinuation of both practices. I invite you to join me. [[User:Hawstom|Tom]] - [[User_talk:Hawstom|Talk]] 17:55, Dec 7, 2004 (UTC)
Jimmy, I sincerely and personally regret that you have suffered personal abuse here. And I regret that VCML advocates are trying to abuse the Wikipedia to prop up their legitimacy. Both unfortunate situations are a discredit to the good name of Wikipedia, which ought to be both a community of goodwill and a reference worthy of respect. I will do all I can to encourage the discontinuation of both practices. I invite you to join me. [[User:Hawstom|Tom]] - [[User_talk:Hawstom|Talk]] 17:55, Dec 7, 2004 (UTC)

== Article Licensing ==

Hi, I've [[User:rambot#Free the Rambot Articles project|started a drive]] to get users to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the [[Creative Commons]] Attribution-Share Alike (''CC-by-sa'') v1.0 and v2.0 [[Creative Commons License|License]]s or into the [[public domain]] if they prefer. The ''CC-by-sa'' license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the [[GFDL]], but it allows '''other projects''', such as [[WikiTravel]], to use our articles. Since you are among the [[Wikipedia:List_of_Wikipedians_by_number_of_edits|top 2000]] Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at ''minimum'' those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:
*[[User talk:Ram-Man#Multi-Licensing FAQ|Multi-Licensing FAQ]] - Lots of questions answered
*[[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|Multi-Licensing Guide]]
*[[User:rambot#Free the Rambot Articles project|Free the Rambot Articles Project]]

To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the "'''<nowiki>{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}</nowiki>'''" template into their user page, but there are other options at [[Wikipedia:Template messages/User namespace#Licensing Templates|Template messages/User namespace]]. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:

:'''Option 1'''
:<nowiki>I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:</nowiki>
:<nowiki>{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}</nowiki>
'''OR'''
:'''Option 2'''
:<nowiki>I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions to any [[U.S. state]], county, or city article as described below:</nowiki>
:<nowiki>{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}</nowiki>

Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace "'''<nowiki>{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}</nowiki>'''" with "'''<nowiki>{{MultiLicensePD}}</nowiki>'''". If you only prefer using the [[GFDL]], I would like to know that too. ''Please let me know'' what you think at my '''[[User talk:Ram-Man|talk page]]'''. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- [[User:Ram-Man|Ram-Man]] ([http://en.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=User_talk:Ram-Man&action=edit&section=new comment]| [[User talk:Ram-Man|talk)]]

Revision as of 18:22, 11 December 2004

Hello Jimmyvanthach and welcome to Wikipedia! Hope you like it here, and stick around.

Here are some tips to help you get started:

Good luck!

Jimmy, I sincerely and personally regret that you have suffered personal abuse here. And I regret that VCML advocates are trying to abuse the Wikipedia to prop up their legitimacy. Both unfortunate situations are a discredit to the good name of Wikipedia, which ought to be both a community of goodwill and a reference worthy of respect. I will do all I can to encourage the discontinuation of both practices. I invite you to join me. Tom - Talk 17:55, Dec 7, 2004 (UTC)