User talk:Snowycats: Difference between revisions
RandNetter96 (talk | contribs) →Kempner function: oops |
|||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
Further to Snowycats, are you also going to template RandNetter96 for repeated (and inappropriate) reversions to my user talk page? --[[Special:Contributions/2601:142:3:F83A:2836:5723:BC35:E4C6|2601:142:3:F83A:2836:5723:BC35:E4C6]] ([[User talk:2601:142:3:F83A:2836:5723:BC35:E4C6|talk]]) 20:32, 11 July 2018 (UTC) |
Further to Snowycats, are you also going to template RandNetter96 for repeated (and inappropriate) reversions to my user talk page? --[[Special:Contributions/2601:142:3:F83A:2836:5723:BC35:E4C6|2601:142:3:F83A:2836:5723:BC35:E4C6]] ([[User talk:2601:142:3:F83A:2836:5723:BC35:E4C6|talk]]) 20:32, 11 July 2018 (UTC) |
||
: No, apparently you just like blindly reverting good IP edits -- ''looking'', ''thinking'', and ''analyzing'' them is too much for you? Alas. --[[Special:Contributions/2601:142:3:F83A:2836:5723:BC35:E4C6|2601:142:3:F83A:2836:5723:BC35:E4C6]] ([[User talk:2601:142:3:F83A:2836:5723:BC35:E4C6|talk]]) 21:12, 11 July 2018 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 21:12, 11 July 2018
 | Snowycats is busy and is going to be on Wikipedia in off-and-on doses, and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
| This is Snowycats's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Archives: Index, 1Auto-archiving period: 2 days  |
Click here to leave a message
Trying actually looking at edits before you revert them. 142.167.242.182 (talk) 05:01, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
Yes, there is an edit war. But this formalist BS is deeply tiresome. Here is what has happened: I have removed content, with a valid explanation in the edit summary. RandNetter, and now you, have restored this content, on purely formalist grounds that offer no substantive objection to the offered explanation. In this situation, there is no possibility of discussion: someone has to say, "I think your edit is bad for the following reason: ..." for there to be something to discuss. Otherwise, all I have to say is, "Yes, I removed sources; that's because they're shitty non-RS sources, as I already explained in my edit summaries." I would like to suggest that either (1) you recognize that there is a substantive question, and offer a substantive opinion on the substantive question, or (2) acknowledge that you are not able to do so (no shame, it is an article on a technical subject) and then do something productive like ask some experts for their opinion instead of reverting out of ignorance. --2601:142:3:F83A:2836:5723:BC35:E4C6 (talk) 20:23, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
This is not your talk page. If you do not have anything to say to Snowycats, then post on my talk. RandNetter96 (Talk)(Contributions) 20:26, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
- My comment above is addressed to Snowycats, that is why I put it here, where it belongs. I think that you should take a break from WP until your reading comprehension improves. --2601:142:3:F83A:2836:5723:BC35:E4C6 (talk) 20:32, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
- Ok, I goofed. Still, very disruptive editing. RandNetter96 (Talk) (Contributions) 20:35, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
Further to Snowycats, are you also going to template RandNetter96 for repeated (and inappropriate) reversions to my user talk page? --2601:142:3:F83A:2836:5723:BC35:E4C6 (talk) 20:32, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
- No, apparently you just like blindly reverting good IP edits -- looking, thinking, and analyzing them is too much for you? Alas. --2601:142:3:F83A:2836:5723:BC35:E4C6 (talk) 21:12, 11 July 2018 (UTC)