Jump to content

Talk:Sage Sharp: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
→‎Notability tag: Replying to comment by 70.162.245.221 (reply-link)
Line 30: Line 30:
This article seems to exist for referencing against Linus's article, but by his own admission he has drawn criticism with regard to his communication style from many people. Is this notable, potentially notable, or CfD? <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:70.162.245.221|70.162.245.221]] ([[User talk:70.162.245.221#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/70.162.245.221|contribs]]) 06:50, 18 March 2018 (UTC)</small>
This article seems to exist for referencing against Linus's article, but by his own admission he has drawn criticism with regard to his communication style from many people. Is this notable, potentially notable, or CfD? <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:70.162.245.221|70.162.245.221]] ([[User talk:70.162.245.221#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/70.162.245.221|contribs]]) 06:50, 18 March 2018 (UTC)</small>
:(Creator of the article, very biased.) I thought Sage Sharp was notable mainly for two reasons: the work they did on the kernel, and their departure of the kernel community. The latter received more coverage, but I had the opinion that they were a prominent member of the community before they left. The Linux.com profile and Business Insider article section (granted, one of nine profiles in the article) amount to some coverage that demonstrates that. You should get some more opinions, though, since as I said I'm quite biased. [[User:Enterprisey|Enterprisey]] ([[User talk:Enterprisey|talk!]]) 03:43, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
:(Creator of the article, very biased.) I thought Sage Sharp was notable mainly for two reasons: the work they did on the kernel, and their departure of the kernel community. The latter received more coverage, but I had the opinion that they were a prominent member of the community before they left. The Linux.com profile and Business Insider article section (granted, one of nine profiles in the article) amount to some coverage that demonstrates that. You should get some more opinions, though, since as I said I'm quite biased. [[User:Enterprisey|Enterprisey]] ([[User talk:Enterprisey|talk!]]) 03:43, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

== Is this a group of people?! ==

"They attended Portland State University..." -- Are bios now collectively refering to multiple people?

Revision as of 10:37, 20 July 2018

WikiProject iconComputer science Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Computer science related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer scienceWikipedia:WikiProject Computer scienceTemplate:WikiProject Computer scienceComputer science articles
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
NiedrigThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Things you can help WikiProject Computer science with:
WikiProject iconOregon Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Oregon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oregon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OregonWikipedia:WikiProject OregonTemplate:WikiProject OregonOregon articles
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
NiedrigThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
The current collaborations of the month are Women's History Month: Create or improve articles for women listed at Oregon Women of Achievement (modern) or Women of the West, Oregon chapter (historical).

Additional references

If useful for article expansion, here are additional references.

About calling out Torvalds from July 2013:

Unrelated to Torvalds or outside that news cycle:

Dreamyshade (talk) 19:05, 18 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notability tag

Question: Should the article receive this tag? {{Notability|date=March 2018}} This article seems to exist for referencing against Linus's article, but by his own admission he has drawn criticism with regard to his communication style from many people. Is this notable, potentially notable, or CfD? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.162.245.221 (talk • contribs) 06:50, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

(Creator of the article, very biased.) I thought Sage Sharp was notable mainly for two reasons: the work they did on the kernel, and their departure of the kernel community. The latter received more coverage, but I had the opinion that they were a prominent member of the community before they left. The Linux.com profile and Business Insider article section (granted, one of nine profiles in the article) amount to some coverage that demonstrates that. You should get some more opinions, though, since as I said I'm quite biased. Enterprisey (talk!) 03:43, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Is this a group of people?!

"They attended Portland State University..." -- Are bios now collectively refering to multiple people?

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Sage_Sharp&oldid=851141893"