User talk:Arided

Hey, this is great, I have a user page now. (Again?) Arided (talk) 23:46, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 15

Hi. When you recently edited Peer learning, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Constructivism (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:41, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Arided. You have new messages at Wingtipvortex's talk page.
Message added 20:03, 10 August 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Wingtipvorte^X PTT ∅ 20:03, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rage (video game), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rage (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:42, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you for your kind words. It's refreshing to receive positive feedback! As a partial disclaimer, I should add that I feel rather more competent to judge whether a paper meets MEDRS than to syndicate on exactly where and how MEDRS should apply. Fwiw, I also had a glance at the 'textbook': imo, a POV attempt, endorsed/legitimized by Elsevier, to 'legitimize' CAM academically. —MistyMorn (talk) 11:06, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

Fyi, I've posted a query [1] about the article you mentioned in a parallel discussion. A further disclaimer: I've no wish to get involved in the TM debate! —MistyMorn (talk) 18:39, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Add sources Lullaby (2013 film) Judge Dredd: Wanted: Dredd or Alive Paul Keres Draughts Wally Squad Isaac Boleslavsky Cleanup José Raúl Capablanca David Levy (chess player) Dirty Frank (comics) Expand Chopper (Judge Dredd character) Frank Anderson (chess player) 2005 in comics Unencyclopaedic Alexander Khalifman Paul Morphy Chess engine

Wikify Cursed Earth Leader (comics) Dick Hodgins, Jr. Orphan Ortifus Abu Nasir (alleged terrorist) Alexander S. Farkas Merge Judge Janus Ogress (comics) Budapest Gambit Stub Red Razors Larry Christiansen Kingdom of the Blind Zahar Efimenko Diktatorat Psykogeddon

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 19:16, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

PlanetMath Books Exchange: some available content

Hi. Not sure it is of interest to you, but anyway: about advanced calculus, here is a nice textbook available for free (for non-profit use). Boris Tsirelson (talk) 19:12, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pharmakon (philosophy) (January 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pharmakon (philosophy) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 20:35, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

• SwisterTwister, pharmakon is, IMO, an eminently notable topic. Whether the article made that clear is another matter, and whether it is ready now remains to be seen. Just thought I'd let you know since it is somewhat technical, perhaps--I saw you noted it was an interesting topic, and it is. A related concept, as Arided no doubt knows, is the German Gift. Happy days, and thanks for all your work at AfC, Drmies (talk) 04:02, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pharmakon (philosophy) has been accepted

Pharmakon (philosophy), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Devopam (talk) 05:22, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Red links in Web annotation

Hi - can I politely request that you not delete red links or unlinked items in the Features table in Web annotation, please? First an anonymous editor removed a lot of the information from the table in 2015, and then you, perhaps based on the fact that there was no longer any information about them, removed most of the red links from the table earlier this year. For comparison purposes it is useful to have this table, and I don't believe our users are best served by deleting rows from the table that don't currently have articles.--greenrd (talk) 21:25, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Arided. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Notice of Fringe Theories Noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Fringe theories/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Tgeorgescu (talk) 02:10, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

January 2017

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Masturbation. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
Do not reintroduce controversial material w/o talk page consensus. Thank you. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:04, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Arided. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Arided. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Arided. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)