Jump to content

Wikipedia:In the news/Candidates: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Wouldn't it be great to have two Indigenous Australians in the Did you Knows? Support Farmer and Lawford Wolf
Line 23: Line 23:
| sign = ''<span style="text-shadow:0px 0px .3em LightSkyBlue;">[[User:DBigXray|D<span style="color:#DA500B">Big</span>]][[User talk:DBigXray|X<span style="color:#10AD00">ray</span>ᗙ]]</span>'' 06:11, 14 August 2019 (UTC) <!-- Do NOT change this -->
| sign = ''<span style="text-shadow:0px 0px .3em LightSkyBlue;">[[User:DBigXray|D<span style="color:#DA500B">Big</span>]][[User talk:DBigXray|X<span style="color:#10AD00">ray</span>ᗙ]]</span>'' 06:11, 14 August 2019 (UTC) <!-- Do NOT change this -->
}}
}}
*'''Support''' especially when the [[Wikipedia:Women_in_Red]] get to her as August is Indigenous Month in that Project. --[[User:EuropracBHIT|Bronwyn Gannan]] ([[User talk:EuropracBHIT|talk]]) 08:12, 14 August 2019 (UTC).

==== RD: Polly Farmer ====
==== RD: Polly Farmer ====
{{ITN candidate
{{ITN candidate
Line 37: Line 37:
*'''Oppose''' A few unsourced patches, but the article is not far off. [[User:Hrodvarsson|Hrodvarsson]] ([[User talk:Hrodvarsson|talk]]) 04:54, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
*'''Oppose''' A few unsourced patches, but the article is not far off. [[User:Hrodvarsson|Hrodvarsson]] ([[User talk:Hrodvarsson|talk]]) 04:54, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
::{{ping|Hrodvarsson}} I have added a couple of references that cover his awards, and membership of premiership teams. Are there other concerns? (Maybe you could ''cn'' them.) [[User:HiLo48|HiLo48]] ([[User talk:HiLo48|talk]]) 06:40, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
::{{ping|Hrodvarsson}} I have added a couple of references that cover his awards, and membership of premiership teams. Are there other concerns? (Maybe you could ''cn'' them.) [[User:HiLo48|HiLo48]] ([[User talk:HiLo48|talk]]) 06:40, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
*'''Support''' he is probably one of the first Excitement Machines of the VFL and WAFL.


== August 13 ==
== August 13 ==

Revision as of 08:12, 14 August 2019

This page provides a place to discuss new items for inclusion on In the news (ITN), a protected template on the Main Page (see past items in the ITN archives). Do not report errors in ITN items that are already on the Main Page here— discuss those at the relevant section of WP:ERRORS.

This candidates page is integrated with the daily pages of Portal:Current events. A light green header appears under each daily section – it includes transcluded Portal:Current events items for that day. You can discuss ITN candidates under the header.

Paralympics opening ceremony
Paralympics opening ceremony

Glossary

  • Blurbs are one-sentence summaries of the news story.
    • Altblurbs, labelled alt1, alt2, etc., are alternative suggestions to cover the same story.
    • A target article, bolded in text, is the focus of the story. Each blurb must have at least one such article, but you may also link non-target articles.
  • Articles in the Ongoing line describe events getting continuous coverage.
  • The Recent deaths (RD) line includes any living thing whose death was recently announced. Consensus may decide to create a blurb for a recent death.

All articles linked in the ITN template must pass our standards of review. They should be up-to-date, demonstrate relevance via good sourcing and have at least an acceptable quality.

Nomination steps

  • Make sure the item you want to nominate has an article that meets our minimum requirements and contains reliable coverage of a current event you want to create a blurb about. We will not post about events described in an article that fails our quality standards.
  • Find the correct section below for the date of the event (not the date nominated). Do not add sections for new dates manually – a bot does that for us each day at midnight (UTC).
  • Create a level 4 header with the article name (==== Your article here ====). Add (RD) or (Ongoing) if appropriate.
Then paste the {{ITN candidate}} template with its parameters and fill them in. The news source should be reliable, support your nomination and be in the article. Write your blurb in simple present tense. Below the template, briefly explain why we should post that event. After that, save your edit. Your nomination is ready!
  • You may add {{ITN note}} to the target article's talk page to let editors know about your nomination.

The better your article's quality, the better it covers the event and the wider its perceived significance (see WP:ITNSIGNIF for details), the better your chances of getting the blurb posted.

Purge this page to update the cache

Headers

  • When the article is ready, updated and there is consensus to post, you can mark the item as (Ready). Remove that wording if you feel the article fails any of these necessary criteria.
  • Admins should always separately verify whether these criteria are met before posting blurbs marked (Ready). For more guidance, check WP:ITN/A.
    • If satisfied, change the header to (Posted).
    • Where there is no consensus, or the article's quality remains poor, change the header to (Closed) or (Not posted).
    • Sometimes, editors ask to retract an already-posted nomination because of a fundamental error or because consensus changed. If you feel the community supports this, remove the item and mark the item as (Pulled).

Voicing an opinion on an item

Format your comment to contain "support" or "oppose", and include a rationale for your choice. In particular, address the notability of the event, the quality of the article, and whether it has been updated.

Please do...

  1. Pick an older item to review near the bottom of this page, before the eligibility runs out and the item scrolls off the page and gets abandoned in the archive, unused and forgotten.
  2. Review an item even if it has already been reviewed by another user. You may be the first to spot a problem, or the first to confirm that an identified problem was fixed. Piling on the list of "support!" votes will help administrators see what is ready to be posted on the Main Page.
  3. Tell about problems in articles if you see them. Be bold and fix them yourself if you know how, or tell others if it's not possible.

Please do not...

  1. Add simple "support!" or "oppose!" votes without including your reasons. Similarly, curt replies such as "who?", "meh", or "duh!" are not helpful. A vote without reasoning means little for us, please elaborate yourself.
  2. Oppose an item just because the event is only relating to a single country, or failing to relate to one. We post a lot of such content, so these comments are generally unproductive.
  3. Accuse other editors of supporting, opposing or nominating due to a personal bias (such as ethnocentrism). We at ITN do not handle conflicts of interest.
  4. Comment on a story without first reading the relevant article(s).
  5. Oppose a recurring item here because you disagree with the recurring items criteria. Discuss them here.
  6. Use ITN as a forum for your own political or personal beliefs. Such comments are irrelevant to the outcome and are potentially disruptive.

Suggesting updates

There are two places where you can request corrections to posted items:

  • Anything that does not change the intent of the blurb (spelling, grammar, markup issues, updating death tolls etc.) should be discussed at WP:Errors.
  • Discuss major changes in the blurb's intent or very complex updates as part of the current ITNC nomination.

Suggestions

August 14

Armed conflicts and attacks

Business and economy

Health and environment

Law and crime

Politics and elections

RD: Ningali Lawford

Article: Ningali Lawford (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): ABC
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Start class article. Death reported on 14 August. DBigXray 06:11, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Polly Farmer

Article: Graham Farmer (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): The Age
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: The article is currently the subject of a Requested move from Graham Farmer to Polly Farmer. The latter is the person's clear common name and is already a redirect. HiLo48 (talk) 03:34, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Hrodvarsson: I have added a couple of references that cover his awards, and membership of premiership teams. Are there other concerns? (Maybe you could cn them.) HiLo48 (talk) 06:40, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support he is probably one of the first Excitement Machines of the VFL and WAFL.

August 13

Business and economy

Disasters and accidents
  • According to Interfax, the governor of Arkhangelsk Oblast dismisses as "complete nonsense" the advice by authorities in Severodvinsk to residents of Nyonoksa to evacuate on August 14. This follows the accidental explosion on Thursday of what is speculated to be a nuclear-powered missile. Russian nuclear agency Rosatom says the failed test involved a "nuclear isotope power source" for a liquid-propelled rocket engine. (The Independent) (CBS News)
  • Venezuelan migrant crisis
    • A new poll from Consultores 21 suggests that at least 4.7 million Venezuelans are living outside of the country, with the range going up to 6 million — 19% of the nation's entire population in 2017. (Miami Herald)
Law and crime

International relations

Politics and elections
  • Presidency of Jair Bolsonaro
    • Hundreds of thousands of students, schoolteachers and university professors hold demonstrations across Brazil against sweeping cuts in the education budget. Protestors also voice opposition to the government's plan to delegate the administrative and financial management of federal universities and institutes to a privately-held fund. (Agência Brasil) (Telesur English)
    • Earlier in the day, over a thousand Indigenous Brazilian women, representing over 100 ethnic groups, march on Brasília after an overnight occupation of the headquarters of the Ministry of Health's Special Secretariat of Indigenous Health. Protestors chanted against the government's recent attempts at municipalization and privatization of the Indigenous health subsystem, and called for stricter environmental regulations. (BBC News) (Telesur English)

Science and technology

RD: Hussein Salem

Article: Hussein Salem (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Reuters
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: C Class article with good sourcing. Egyptian Tycoon. DBigXray 06:05, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) Typhoon Lekima (2019)

Proposed image
Article: Typhoon Lekima (2019) (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: Typhoon Lekima impacts the Phillipines and East China, killing 80 and causing at least US$3.47 billion in damage. (Post)
Alternative blurb: Typhoon Lekima impacts the Phillipines and East China, killing at least 80 and damaging more than 900,000 acres (3,600 km2) of cropland.
Alternative blurb II: Typhoon Lekima (pictured) impacts the Philippines, the Ryukyu Islands, Taiwan and East China, killing at least 80 people.
News source(s): BBC, NBCNews
Credits:

Article updated

Nominator's comments: Very notable typhoon that has killed more people and caused more damage than most storms do. NoahTalk 01:35, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 12

Business and economy

Disasters and accidents
  • At least 24 people die after floods strike across Vietnam. In the south, nearly 3,900 houses and more than 22,000 hectares of crops are submerged, mostly in Lam Dong Province. Floods also damage more than 30km of national roads, including the road leading to the tourist city of Dalat and destroy 142 hectares of aquarium farming and 4,300 cages of river-raised fish. (Al Jazeera)

International relations

Law and crime

Politics and elections

RD: DJ Arafat

Article: DJ Arafat (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): BBC, CNN
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: I am working to fix the sourcing and expansion. DBigXray 07:29, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Working yup, I am working to address these. Some help will be appreciated. :) --DBigXray 15:02, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

RD: José Luis Brown

Article: José Luis Brown (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): NY Times, Euronews
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Former Argentina international soccer player. FIFA World Cup winner with Argentina in 1986. Article needs some referencing work. --SirEdimon (talk) 04:39, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Lu Yonggen

Article: Lu Yonggen (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): The Paper
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Chinese scientist and philanthropist. Article is fully sourced. Zanhe (talk) 00:59, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 11

Armed conflicts and attacks
  • Saudi Arabian-led intervention in Yemen
  • Israeli–Palestinian conflict
    • Israeli riot police clash with Palestinians at the Al-Aqsa Mosque and Temple Mount site in East Jerusalem. With holidays coincidentally falling on the same day (11 August) this year for both Judaism and Islam, some Palestinians began protesting the admittance of Jewish visitors to the site, despite a longstanding agreement barring Jewish visitors. Following the agreement, the Al-Aqsa police barred Jews from the site. Israeli forces then fired rubber bullets and tear gas at people inside. The Jews were then admitted, which caused further tensions on both sides of the dispute. (Al Jazeera)
Arts and culture
Politics and elections

(Posted) RD: Sergio Obeso Rivera

Article: Sergio Obeso Rivera (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Vatican News, Catholic Herald
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Cardinal of the Catholic Church; article short but referenced. — RAVENPVFF · talk · 15:07, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 10

Armed conflicts and attacks

Disasters and accidents

International relations

Law and crime

Politics and elections

9M730 Burevestnik

Article: 9M730 Burevestnik (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: 9M730 Burevestnik, a Russian experimental nuclear-powered, nuclear-armed cruise missile, blows up, killing seven people. (Post)
News source(s): [1][2]
Credits:

Nominator's comments: I realise that as a tragedies go, it doesn't rise to the level of a truck explosion or car bombing, but these are common events and this is rare and interesting. A lot of people find these sort of accidents fascinating. And there's always the danger that one day we may wind up on the wrong end of something like this. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 01:49, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

2019 Rugby Championship

Article: 2019 Rugby Championship (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ In rugby union, South Africa win the Rugby Championship. (Post)
News source(s): RTE
Credits:

The nominated event is listed on WP:ITN/R, so each occurrence is presumed to be important enough to post. Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article and update meet WP:ITNCRIT, not the significance.

Nominator's comments: ITNR and not nominated three days ago, needs work on prose for sure, but just putting it out there in case we all missed it. The Rambling Man (REJOICE!) 09:30, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) Explosion in Morogoro, Tanzania

Article: Morogoro tanker explosion (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ A fuel tanker collides with a motorcycle, causing an explosion leading to 62 deaths and 70 injuries in Morogoro, Tanzania (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ In Morogoro, Tanzania a fuel tanker explodes, causing the deaths of 62 people and injuring 70
Alternative blurb II: ​ At least 62 people died and more than 70 injured in a fuel tanker explosion in Tanzania
News source(s): CNN, NPR, New York Times, BBC, NYT 2, archive 2
Credits:

Nominator's comments: I updated the article, might have a few errors though. BoothSiftTalks 07:33, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks User:Masem. Can someone post the credits ? --DBigXray 17:18, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
done by User:Ammarpad --DBigXray 18:58, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

(Closed) (Posted to RD; no consensus to post blurb): Jeffrey Epstein

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Proposed image
Article: Jeffrey Epstein (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ American financier and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein (pictured), facing numerous charges of child sex trafficking, kills himself while in U.S. federal custody. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ In United States federal custody while facing numerous charges of international sex trafficking, Jeffrey Epstein (pictured) dies of an apparent suicide.
Alternative blurb II: ​ Convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein (pictured) kills himself in US federal custody during an ongoing international sex trafficking investigation.
Alternative blurb III: ​ Convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein (pictured) dies of an apparent suicide while in U.S. federal custody, facing numerous charges of international sex trafficking.
Alternative blurb IV: ​ American financier and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein (pictured) dies of an apparent suicide while in U.S. federal custody, facing numerous charges of international sex trafficking.
News source(s): NY Times, ABC7 NY, AP
Credits:

Article updated
Nominator's comments: Article seems to be in order because it has been in the spotlight recently so most of it has been under scrutiny. --Pudeo (talk) 13:13, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Patently untrue, I don't know of a single person in even the UK that reads the NYT at all, an American option here would be WaPo, but even that's uncommon; it's not even the most circulated or bought newspaper in the US, actually, let's not base an argument on clear hyperbole Kingsif (talk) 12:30, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Clearly, you should widen your circle of acquaintances. – Sca (talk) 14:27, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • PS: Note that the hed on the AP story now says, "Officials: Jeffrey Epstein dies by suicide in jail cell," while that on the NYT page one promo says, "Jeffrey Epstein Hanged Himself in Jail, Officials Say." – Sca (talk) 16:42, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    This article in NYTimes used to say committed suicide less than an hour ago. --- Coffeeandcrumbs 16:48, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    I believe the reason why the media is mostly using "apparent suicide" rather than "committed suicide" is because there are doubts circulating as to whether Epstein actually died by suicide. For example: [9] Thus, the usage of "apparent suicide" in this circumstance would not necessarily disprove the usage of "commit suicide" in cases where the manner of death is certain. NorthernFalcon (talk) 07:21, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose blurb – Subject was of scant general significance; notable mainly for the lurid details of his past – support RD only. – Sca (talk) 15:08, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    • Here's the rub - the way the case was going, with this week revealing a number of high profile individuals that were claimed to be involved with Epstein's sex trafficking, there was a likely high chance we would have posted the results of the conviction - this is a high-profile trial even if it only "local". The fact that the individual decided to end his involvement via suicide - well, he won't be convicted, but there will continue to be ongoing investigation, and the case remains of high importance. Hence why a blurb makes sense here. --Masem (t) 15:20, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
He may be important to whatever other cases may arise from this situation, but posting his death as an RD is sufficient for the record. – Sca (talk) 16:16, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose blurb Wikipedia is (in theory at least) meant to be an encyclopedia, not a newspaper or a gossip magazine. Similar to Sca's comment above, the only reason this is deemed to be newsworthy is because of the nature of the allegations against him. It's extremely likely that most other people in the finance sector are not deemed to be worthy of a blurb upon their death. Chrisclear (talk) 15:21, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support RD only This guy is notable enough to warrant ITNC RD and I see no CN tags on his article. Multiple sources have reported his death. However, I see little hope of us ever getting the blurb correct and I'm not sure that his death warrants a blurb anyway. pbp 15:32, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Ready for RD RD is a no brainer. The article is in good shape including solid referencing. Weak Support for blurb. Although there is a sensationalist element to this story, his death does seem to meet the criteria for a blurb at WP:ITNRD. -Ad Orientem (talk) 15:36, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support AltBlurb The circumstances around his death are sufficient in my view to warrant a blurb. I don't think it's being gossipy to acknowledge that. As Masem said, this was a significant trial implicating multiple high-profile individuals, and the death of the central figure seems significant. Regardless, his death should be posted as an RD if not as a blurb. Cwilson97 (talk) 15:37, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Alt Blurb Epstein may not seem like a hugely significant figure, but this story goes beyond him. Lepricavark (talk) 15:43, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support altblurb 2 Deserves a blurb, Epstein shouldn't be in bold if the story is not just the death but also how big the case was and the connected relevance (i.e. he wouldn't get a blurb on his own, don't make him the target). Kingsif (talk) 15:49, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support one of the altblurb: This isn't just a death, this is a major development in an ongoing news story. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:03, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support blurb Clearly. The death, rather than his life, is indisputably the story, and it is front-page news internationally. This is a significant development in his already-notable case. Davey2116 (talk) 16:22, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support blurb - Just RD? What the hell. STSC (talk) 16:25, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for this enlightening comment. – Sca (talk) 16:36, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
"Clearly" is one of the two most overused words in the English language. – Sca (talk) 16:52, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for this enlightening comment. :) Spengouli (talk) 16:54, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
"Inconceivable!" --Masem (t) 16:55, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I think "prominently" is pushing it a bit. Its coverage on Le Monde is now at a par with a story about a provincial hospital. On Corriere it is not even the top ranking US story, and is ranked behind this important bit of world news. This is really a US story only, and not a particularly prominent one either. —Brigade Piron (talk) 18:00, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Not to mention this bit of world news. – Sca (talk) 22:40, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose blurb. There has been a significant creep towards blurbs for RDs. These should be really exceptional. His criminal record is hardly enough to justify treatment as a world leader, and there are plenty of other financiers. —Brigade Piron (talk) 17:53, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This isn't a case of a death of someone at the top of their field. The blurb is proposed because the death, rather than the person himself, is newsworthy (as per the death blurbs criteria at WP:ITNRD; if the person's death itself is newsworthy for either the manner of death or the newsworthy reaction to it, it may merit a blurb). Davey2116 (talk) 19:06, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I like the use of the word "may" there. I presume you are not suggesting that suicides are intrinsically "newsworthy" so you must be referring to the reporting of it. I must admit I do not see this at all. It is true that there has been a fair bit of rather bland coverage, but there has hardly been a "newsworthy reaction". —Brigade Piron (talk) 09:02, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose blurb of any kind. This is a case of what-might-have-been. If he had stayed alive and his criminal case proceeded, he might have named a lot of powerful and rich people who were his "clients" and that could indeed have had major repercussions, in the U.S. one beyond. But with Epstein dead, none of this is going to happen. Also, I find the phrasing "apparent suicide" highly objectionable. There has not been any suggestion in any of the RS reporting the story that his death was anything other than suicide. Calling it "apparent suicide" casts doubt on this fact. We should not be promoting or worse yet, creating, conspiracy theories around his death. Nsk92 (talk) 17:55, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
On the contrary, it has not been confirmed as suicide at all. Hence we must say "apparent" or somesuch, if we have a blurb in the first place. I would lean towards not having one.  — Amakuru (talk) 19:02, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
(edit conflict) The term "apparent suicide" is used in many RS reporting on the death (e.g., NBC News, WaPo, CBS, WSJ, etc.). Davey2116 (talk) 19:06, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Actually the criteria for death blurbs are listed at WP:ITNRD. This appears to meet that criteria. -Ad Orientem (talk) 18:41, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Well, you can't libel the dead. – Sca (talk) 22:12, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
In this case, "big" = relentlessly hyped because prurient. – Sca (talk) 14:35, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Please consider striking this. Prurient means titillating or appealing to lustful or sexual desire. By saying this is hyped because it is prurient, you are suggesting we're all secretly getting off on stories about kids getting raped. That the crimes are of a sexual nature is true, that doesn't mean interest is likewise derived. The key points of curiosity here are 1) a rich person getting away with crimes because they are rich, and 2) connected to powerful people 3) who may themselves be complicit, 4)despite the crimes being of the sort that are not typically swept under the rug. GreatCaesarsGhost 15:40, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This user does not reply to 'users' who do not exist. – Sca (talk)
One must wonder at the relevance of the Epstein tale to Chinese society. – Sca (talk) 15:56, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
One must wonder at the relevance of Solomon P. Sharp to Chinese society. --- Coffeeandcrumbs 23:03, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment I stress this part from ITN guidelines about deaths: For deaths where the cause of death itself is a major story (such as the unexpected death of a prominent figure by homicide, suicide, or accident) or where the events surrounding the death merit additional explanation (such as ongoing investigations, major stories about memorial services or international reactions, etc.) a blurb may be merited to explain the death's relevance.. There is definitely an allowance for this story, due to the unusualness of the death (in the midst of a major story, and now with several questions being raised of how he did it when he was to be on suicide watch). It can still be opposed, but I think most supporting are not doing this in recognizing Epstein as a transformative leader. -Masem (t) 16:26, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Nearly 5,000 Americans committed suicide in custody in 2014 (1) and it is probably higher now. Is that unusual? —Brigade Piron (talk) 18:26, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
How many of those 5,000 Americans have substantial ties to many important people, including a sitting US President, a former US President, and a member of the British Royal Family? 331dot (talk) 21:39, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • That percentage would not pass an RFA, and in any event consensus is not a majority vote; the discussion above resulted in significant opposition that did not appear to be assuaged in the course of the discussion. Having said all that, I have no position as to whether the discussion should be extended. – John M Wolfson (talkcontribs) 04:14, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

August 9

Business and economy

Disasters and accidents

Law and crime

Politics and elections

(Posted) RD: Miriam Rivera

Article: Miriam Rivera (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Variety BBC
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Start Class article with good sourcing. Transgender TV personality. Death announced on 9 Aug. DBigXray 14:29, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the kind feedback. I have removed the Youtube refs. Sun is not being used for anything controversial. --DBigXray 06:01, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Paul Findley

Article: Paul Findley (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): State Journal-Register, Military News, Seattle TimesKko updated =
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

 BoothSiftTalks 05:50, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 8

Armed conflicts and attacks

Disasters and accidents

Health and environment

Law and crime

Politics and elections

RD: Ernie Colón

Article: Ernie Colón (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Hollywood Reporter
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: 60+ yr career comic artist across DC, Marvel and others. Unfortunately article has a ways to go sourcing wise. Masem (t) 22:59, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Rosie Ruiz

Article: Rosie Ruiz (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): NBC News
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Marathon runner (allegedly...) who got famous by cheating her way to winning the Boston Marathon Tdunsky(Talk) 15:06, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Fabrizio Saccomanni

Article: Fabrizio Saccomanni (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): EuroNews, Corriere del Ticino
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

 BoothSiftTalks 22:40, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

(Closed) Saudi Arabia loosens travel restrictions on women

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: Women's rights in Saudi Arabia (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: Saudi Arabia loosens travel restrictions on women (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ In a royal decree, Saudi Arabia loosens travel restrictions on women
News source(s): NBC, New York Times, Guardian, Jerusalem Post, Zeit
Credits:
 BoothSiftTalks 06:56, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Even if true, a totalitarian dictatorship like Saudi Arabia taking one incrimental step in women liberation all the while killing hundreds of thousands of civilians in Yemen, Syria, and across the world (as well as in their own country) doesn't deserve a mention on the third most popular website's main page next to anything mentioning positive change there 5.44.170.9 (talk) 08:02, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Law isnt passed until August next year. This is just a stament of intent at this point and changes nothing. This should be brought up if the law is actually passed85.159.132.48 (talk) 08:36, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose as premature. Unless this gains sufficient notability to justify its own article, I would likely oppose its renomination as well. That said I would gently remind those who may be unaware that we do not weigh nominations based on any political criteria. Nor do we encourage politically pointed commentary in our discussions. Please see... WP:RGW and WP:NOTFORUM. And lastly, while we may discuss to our hearts content, we ask that editors actually vote only once (even if your IP changes). -Ad Orientem (talk) 17:24, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
While I can't be sure (hence my decision not to strike the latter vote), there are some remarkable similarities in their style of commentary. So yes, I strongly suspect they are the same person. -Ad Orientem (talk) 17:59, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Not the same person.... and no idea how you would come to that. I am unfamillier with how to format pages so i copy whoever is above me, still learning and my work computer wont let me log into my account. Pleasae assume good faith85.159.132.48 (talk) 08:17, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

August 7

Armed conflicts and attacks
Disaster and accidents
  • The death toll of the heat wave in Japan rises to 57, while 18,347 others are hospitalized. (Japan Times)
Law and crime
  • 2019 California stabbing rampage
    • A Garden Grove, California, man stabs and kills four people and wounds two others in a two-hour crime spree at a series of Orange County locations. Both injured victims are expected to survive. The motive of the 33-year-old suspect, who was arrested at the last scene, appears to be robbery as well as "anger and hate." (CNN) (AP via KESQ-TV)
Politics and elections

RD: Kary Mullis

Article: Kary Mullis (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): https://mynewsla.com/education/2019/08/08/nobel-winner-kary-banks-mullis-who-revolutionized-dna-research-dies-in-o-c/ https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/obituaries/kary-mullis-unconventional-nobel-laureate-who-unlocked-dna-research-dies-at-74/2019/08/12/e6391612-bbed-11e9-b3b4-2bb69e8c4e39_story.html
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Updated, reliably sourced, of sufficient quality sentausa (talk) 14:35, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • It's very close, but the last sentence of "Personal views" about being called an AIDS denialist 100% needs sourcing, and the awards need sourcing. Should not be hard to get this up before it slips off as stale. --Masem (t) 14:52, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) Suicide Blast in Afghanistan

Article: August 2019 Kabul bombing (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ A suicide bombing in Kabul, Afghanistan, leads to 14 deaths and 145 injuries. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ A suicide bombing in Kabul, Afghanistan, leaves 14 people dead and 145 injured
Alternative blurb II: ​ A suicide bombing near a police station in Kabul, Afghanistan, leaves 14 people dead and 145 injured
News source(s): BBC, NBC, New York Times
Credits:

Article updated

 BoothSiftTalks 18:44, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I see the article but it's far too short for ITN. And checking news -- coverage is surprisingly light. I mean, we have BBC and NYTimes covering it, but its not bringing up as many hits as I thought. We do need to consider that this region is unstable, there are similar bombings happening all the time, and the news tends to be weary of it, hence the lack of coverage. --Masem (t) 22:27, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support, good work. Spengouli (talk) 15:29, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak support as long as we post mass shootings in the US, there should be nothing stopping us posting these terror attacks in other similarly-afflicted countries. Weak because article isn't pulling up any trees, but just adequate. The Rambling Man (REJOICE!) 07:28, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support It seems initially this was nominated without a standalone article, but now we have something and it looks presentable. – Ammarpad (talk) 11:16, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose – Sketchy – 190 words of real text – and such bombings are virtually commonplace for Afghanistan 18 years after the ill-fated U.S. invasion. – Sca (talk) 15:43, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Henri Belolo

Article: Henri Belolo (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): USA Today
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Start Class article with excellent sourcing. Death announced on 7 Aug, died on 3 Aug. DBigXray 11:07, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: David Berman (musician)

Article: David Berman (musician) (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Rolling Stones
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Start Class article. I am working to fix the sourcing with good sourcing. DBigXray 06:22, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Fixed A lot of improvements have been done in the sourcing area to make it worthy for ITN RD. Requesting a review again. --DBigXray 11:47, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks User:Samwalton9. Can someone post the credits? --DBigXray 12:33, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Done by User:Samwalton9--DBigXray 07:43, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

(Closed) Tardigrades on moon

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Proposed image
Article: Tardigrades (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ Tardigrades: 'Water bears' stuck on the moon after crash (Post)
News source(s): BBC
Credits:
Nominator's comments: The moon might now be home to thousands of planet Earth's most indestructible animals. 86.187.166.122 (talk) 21:30, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment In the unlikely event we post this, we need an actual reliable source; the one you've misleadingly labelled as "BBC" is actually Newsbeat which may technically be part of the BBC but is about as much a reliable source as a typical comic book. This story is considerably less of a story than it appears; although tardigrades do have the ability to enter cryptobiosis, they certainly won't have the ability to revive in a dry vacuum. The bacteria from Neil Armstrong's boot probably have a greater chance of lunar propagation. ‑ Iridescent 21:59, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
"That's one small stumble for Israel Aerospace Industries, one giant leap for moss piglets". Martinevans123 (talk) 22:20, 8 August 2019 (UTC) [reply]

(Posted) RD: J. Om Prakash

Article: J. Om Prakash (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): NDTV
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Start Class article with excellent sourcing DBigXray 16:25, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support - good to go.--BabbaQ (talk) 20:10, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose While well-referenced, the article has no sections and is too sparse in its coverage of the subject (the article and talk page still state that it's a stub); there is no lede/introduction; a good portion of the article consists of listing information in prose format (movies he produced and directed); and the longest paragraph currently in the article consists of just 3 sentences. SpencerT•C 02:05, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Fixed User:Spencer Thanks for the useful feedback, I have expanded the article since you last reviewed. May I request you to take another look if you can support this.--DBigXray 07:47, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

References

Nominators often include links to external websites and other references in discussions on this page. It is usually best to provide such links using the inline URL syntax [http://example.com] rather than using <ref></ref> tags, because that keeps all the relevant information in the same place as the nomination without having to jump to this section, and facilitates the archiving process.

For the times when <ref></ref> tags are being used, here are their contents: