Jump to content

Talk:2019 Beirut drone crash: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 20: Line 20:
::::Those Israeli sources seem to have written the analyst early on, before the purpose of the attack, damage and Hezbollah response were announced. After their cover was blown Israeli media shifted towards accepting responsibility.[https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/.premium-israel-broke-the-rules-of-the-game-and-now-the-ball-in-hezbollah-s-court-1.7740670] Even if the analyst you have given are true, Israel [[2019 Qousaya attack|struck a second site]] in Lebanon the next day.(second time since 2006 counting this one) Therefore it makes this one more likely to be done by Israel. [[User:Bill497|Bill497]] ([[User talk:Bill497|talk]]) 16:15, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
::::Those Israeli sources seem to have written the analyst early on, before the purpose of the attack, damage and Hezbollah response were announced. After their cover was blown Israeli media shifted towards accepting responsibility.[https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/.premium-israel-broke-the-rules-of-the-game-and-now-the-ball-in-hezbollah-s-court-1.7740670] Even if the analyst you have given are true, Israel [[2019 Qousaya attack|struck a second site]] in Lebanon the next day.(second time since 2006 counting this one) Therefore it makes this one more likely to be done by Israel. [[User:Bill497|Bill497]] ([[User talk:Bill497|talk]]) 16:15, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
:::::The meida cannot accept responsibility as it not a government but even you source write that "If Israel was behind this attack..." as it have no knowledge who behind it . --[[user:Shrike|Shrike]] ([[User talk:Shrike|talk]]) 16:32, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
:::::The meida cannot accept responsibility as it not a government but even you source write that "If Israel was behind this attack..." as it have no knowledge who behind it . --[[user:Shrike|Shrike]] ([[User talk:Shrike|talk]]) 16:32, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
::::Those Israeli sources seem to have written the analyst early on, before the purpose of the attack, damage and Hezbollah response were announced. After their cover was blown Israeli media shifted towards accepting responsibility.[https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/.premium-israel-broke-the-rules-of-the-game-and-now-the-ball-in-hezbollah-s-court-1.7740670] Even if the analyst you have given are true, Israel [[2019 Qousaya attack|struck a second site]] in Lebanon the next day.(second time since 2006 counting this one) Therefore it makes this one more likely to be done by Israel. [[User:Bill497|Bill497]] ([[User talk:Bill497|talk]]) 16:15, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:33, 26 August 2019

POV

This claims of Hezbollah is alleged it doesn't mean we should remove it.The Israeli claims reported by WP:RS and hence WP:DUE.--Shrike (talk) 15:58, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Give a reliable source of that claim.Mr.User200 (talk) 15:59, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Times of Israel [1] and ynet [2] --Shrike (talk) 16:05, 26 August 2019 (UTC)}[reply]
"The release of photographs of a drone that crashed in the Lebanese capital Beirut early Sunday morning cast doubt on the claim by the Hezbollah terror group that the craft belonged to the Israeli military, with some Israeli analysts speculating that the unmanned aerial vehicle was in fact an Iranian model."
Please avoid weasel Words. [WP:Alleged]Mr.User200 (talk) 16:08, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Per WP:NPOV we bring both claims.The hezbollah has no proof that those drones are Israeli --Shrike (talk) 16:10, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The second sources look fair to me. It clearly states the claim. Iam adding it dont worry.Mr.User200 (talk) 16:12, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Better but my version is even better as it actually follows WP:NPOV and gives both claim equal weight as no one really knows what the WP:TRUTH is --Shrike (talk) 16:17, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Those Israeli sources seem to have written the analyst early on, before the purpose of the attack, damage and Hezbollah response were announced. After their cover was blown Israeli media shifted towards accepting responsibility.[3] Even if the analyst you have given are true, Israel struck a second site in Lebanon the next day.(second time since 2006 counting this one) Therefore it makes this one more likely to be done by Israel. Bill497 (talk) 16:15, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The meida cannot accept responsibility as it not a government but even you source write that "If Israel was behind this attack..." as it have no knowledge who behind it . --Shrike (talk) 16:32, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Those Israeli sources seem to have written the analyst early on, before the purpose of the attack, damage and Hezbollah response were announced. After their cover was blown Israeli media shifted towards accepting responsibility.[4] Even if the analyst you have given are true, Israel struck a second site in Lebanon the next day.(second time since 2006 counting this one) Therefore it makes this one more likely to be done by Israel. Bill497 (talk) 16:15, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]