Talk:2019 Beirut drone crash: Difference between revisions
Jim Michael (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Mr.User200 (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
::::Those Israeli sources seem to have written the analyst early on, before the purpose of the attack, damage and Hezbollah response were announced. After their cover was blown Israeli media shifted towards accepting responsibility.[https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/.premium-israel-broke-the-rules-of-the-game-and-now-the-ball-in-hezbollah-s-court-1.7740670] Even if the analyst you have given are true, Israel [[2019 Qousaya attack|struck a second site]] in Lebanon the next day.(second time since 2006 counting this one) Therefore it makes this one more likely to be done by Israel. [[User:Bill497|Bill497]] ([[User talk:Bill497|talk]]) 16:15, 26 August 2019 (UTC) |
::::Those Israeli sources seem to have written the analyst early on, before the purpose of the attack, damage and Hezbollah response were announced. After their cover was blown Israeli media shifted towards accepting responsibility.[https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/.premium-israel-broke-the-rules-of-the-game-and-now-the-ball-in-hezbollah-s-court-1.7740670] Even if the analyst you have given are true, Israel [[2019 Qousaya attack|struck a second site]] in Lebanon the next day.(second time since 2006 counting this one) Therefore it makes this one more likely to be done by Israel. [[User:Bill497|Bill497]] ([[User talk:Bill497|talk]]) 16:15, 26 August 2019 (UTC) |
||
:::::The meida cannot accept responsibility as it not a government but even you source write that "If Israel was behind this attack..." as it have no knowledge who behind it . --[[user:Shrike|Shrike]] ([[User talk:Shrike|talk]]) 16:32, 26 August 2019 (UTC) |
:::::The meida cannot accept responsibility as it not a government but even you source write that "If Israel was behind this attack..." as it have no knowledge who behind it . --[[user:Shrike|Shrike]] ([[User talk:Shrike|talk]]) 16:32, 26 August 2019 (UTC) |
||
::::Those Israeli sources seem to have written the analyst early on, before the purpose of the attack, damage and Hezbollah response were announced. After their cover was blown Israeli media shifted towards accepting responsibility.[https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/.premium-israel-broke-the-rules-of-the-game-and-now-the-ball-in-hezbollah-s-court-1.7740670] Even if the analyst you have given are true, Israel [[2019 Qousaya attack|struck a second site]] in Lebanon the next day.(second time since 2006 counting this one) Therefore it makes this one more likely to be done by Israel. [[User:Bill497|Bill497]] ([[User talk:Bill497|talk]]) 16:15, 26 August 2019 (UTC) |
Revision as of 16:33, 26 August 2019
Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.
|
This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
POV
This claims of Hezbollah is alleged it doesn't mean we should remove it.The Israeli claims reported by WP:RS and hence WP:DUE.--Shrike (talk) 15:58, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
- Give a reliable source of that claim.Mr.User200 (talk) 15:59, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
- Times of Israel [1] and ynet [2] --Shrike (talk) 16:05, 26 August 2019 (UTC)}
- "The release of photographs of a drone that crashed in the Lebanese capital Beirut early Sunday morning cast doubt on the claim by the Hezbollah terror group that the craft belonged to the Israeli military, with some Israeli analysts speculating that the unmanned aerial vehicle was in fact an Iranian model."
- Please avoid weasel Words. [WP:Alleged]Mr.User200 (talk) 16:08, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
- Per WP:NPOV we bring both claims.The hezbollah has no proof that those drones are Israeli --Shrike (talk) 16:10, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
- The second sources look fair to me. It clearly states the claim. Iam adding it dont worry.Mr.User200 (talk) 16:12, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
- Better but my version is even better as it actually follows WP:NPOV and gives both claim equal weight as no one really knows what the WP:TRUTH is --Shrike (talk) 16:17, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
- The second sources look fair to me. It clearly states the claim. Iam adding it dont worry.Mr.User200 (talk) 16:12, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
- Those Israeli sources seem to have written the analyst early on, before the purpose of the attack, damage and Hezbollah response were announced. After their cover was blown Israeli media shifted towards accepting responsibility.[3] Even if the analyst you have given are true, Israel struck a second site in Lebanon the next day.(second time since 2006 counting this one) Therefore it makes this one more likely to be done by Israel. Bill497 (talk) 16:15, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
- The meida cannot accept responsibility as it not a government but even you source write that "If Israel was behind this attack..." as it have no knowledge who behind it . --Shrike (talk) 16:32, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
- Those Israeli sources seem to have written the analyst early on, before the purpose of the attack, damage and Hezbollah response were announced. After their cover was blown Israeli media shifted towards accepting responsibility.[4] Even if the analyst you have given are true, Israel struck a second site in Lebanon the next day.(second time since 2006 counting this one) Therefore it makes this one more likely to be done by Israel. Bill497 (talk) 16:15, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
- Per WP:NPOV we bring both claims.The hezbollah has no proof that those drones are Israeli --Shrike (talk) 16:10, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
- Give a reliable source of that claim.Mr.User200 (talk) 15:59, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
- Start-Class aviation articles
- Start-Class Aviation accident articles
- Aviation accident task force articles
- WikiProject Aviation articles
- Start-Class Explosives articles
- Unknown-importance Explosives articles
- Start-Class Israel-related articles
- Unknown-importance Israel-related articles
- WikiProject Israel articles
- Start-Class Lebanon articles
- Unknown-importance Lebanon articles
- WikiProject Lebanon articles
- Start-Class military history articles
- Start-Class Middle Eastern military history articles
- Middle Eastern military history task force articles