Jump to content

Rio Grande border disputes: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 7: Line 7:
*The [[Horcón Tract]] was a parcel of land surrounded by an oxbow bend of the Rio Grande, including the village of [[Rio Rico, Texas]], that inadvertently defaulted to Mexican administration with the passage of time after an irrigation company in 1905 dug an unapproved cut across the oxbow to change the course of the river. The issue, which was not technically a dispute as both sides were in agreement about its legal status upon its discovery, was resolved by the 1970 treaty which ceded the land to Mexico, but the official handover did not take place until 1977.
*The [[Horcón Tract]] was a parcel of land surrounded by an oxbow bend of the Rio Grande, including the village of [[Rio Rico, Texas]], that inadvertently defaulted to Mexican administration with the passage of time after an irrigation company in 1905 dug an unapproved cut across the oxbow to change the course of the river. The issue, which was not technically a dispute as both sides were in agreement about its legal status upon its discovery, was resolved by the 1970 treaty which ceded the land to Mexico, but the official handover did not take place until 1977.


Numerous border treaties are jointly administered by the [[International Boundary and Water Commission]], which was established in 1889 to maintain the border, allocate river waters between the two nations, and provide for flood control and water sanitation. Once viewed as a model of international cooperation, in recent decades the IBWC has been heavily criticized as an institutional anachronism, by-passed by modern social, environmental and political issues.<ref>Robert J. McCarthy, Executive Authority, Adaptive Treaty Interpretation, and the International Boundary and Water Commission, U.S.-Mexico, 14-2 U. Denv. Water L. Rev. 197(Spring 2011) (also available for free download at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1839903).</ref>
Numerous border treaties are jointly administered by the [[International Boundary and Water Commission]], which was established in 1889 to maintain the border, allocate river waters between the two nations, and provide for flood control and water sanitation. Once viewed as a model of international cooperation, in recent decades the IBWC has been heavily criticized as an institutional anachronism, by-passed by modern social, environmental and political issues.<ref>Robert J. McCarthy, Executive Authority, Adaptive Treaty Interpretation, and the International Boundary and Water Commission, U.S.-Mexico, 14-2 U. Denv. Water L. Rev. 197(Spring 2011) (also available for free download at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1839903).</ref> In particular, jurisdictional issues regarding [[water rights]] in the [[Rio Grande Valley]] have caused tension between farmers in the border region and sparked a "water war," according to Mexican political scientist [[Armand Peschard-Sverdrup]].<ref>{{cite book |last1=Peschard-Sverdrup |first1=Armand |title=U.S.-Mexico Transboundary Water Management: The Case of the Rio Grande/Rio Bravo |date=January 7, 2003 |publisher=Center for Strategic & International Studies |isbn=978-0892064243 |edition=1}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last1=Yardley |first1=Jim |title=Water Rights War Rages on Faltering Rio Grande|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2002/04/19/us/water-rights-war-rages-on-faltering-rio-grande.html |accessdate=5 April 2020 |publisher=The New York Times |date=April 19, 2002}}</ref>


== References ==
== References ==

Revision as of 12:55, 5 April 2020

The Rio Grande (Río Bravo del Norte) has changed course several times in recorded history, leading to a number of border disputes and uncertainties, both international (involving Mexico and the United States) and between individual U.S. states:

Numerous border treaties are jointly administered by the International Boundary and Water Commission, which was established in 1889 to maintain the border, allocate river waters between the two nations, and provide for flood control and water sanitation. Once viewed as a model of international cooperation, in recent decades the IBWC has been heavily criticized as an institutional anachronism, by-passed by modern social, environmental and political issues.[1] In particular, jurisdictional issues regarding water rights in the Rio Grande Valley have caused tension between farmers in the border region and sparked a "water war," according to Mexican political scientist Armand Peschard-Sverdrup.[2][3]

References

  1. ^ Robert J. McCarthy, Executive Authority, Adaptive Treaty Interpretation, and the International Boundary and Water Commission, U.S.-Mexico, 14-2 U. Denv. Water L. Rev. 197(Spring 2011) (also available for free download at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1839903).
  2. ^ Peschard-Sverdrup, Armand (January 7, 2003). U.S.-Mexico Transboundary Water Management: The Case of the Rio Grande/Rio Bravo (1 ed.). Center for Strategic & International Studies. ISBN 978-0892064243.
  3. ^ Yardley, Jim (April 19, 2002). "Water Rights War Rages on Faltering Rio Grande". The New York Times. Retrieved 5 April 2020.