Jump to content

Talk:Joseph Stalin: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Talk:Joseph Stalin/Archive 22) (bot
No edit summary
Line 24: Line 24:
{{On this day|date1=2006-04-03|oldid1=46690094|date2=2008-04-03|oldid2=202969208|date3=2011-04-03|oldid3=422034811|date4=2012-04-03|oldid4=485278896|date5=2014-04-03|oldid5=602374313|date6=2016-04-03|oldid6=713325493|date7=2018-04-03|oldid7=834032350|date8=2020-04-03|oldid8=948525242}}
{{On this day|date1=2006-04-03|oldid1=46690094|date2=2008-04-03|oldid2=202969208|date3=2011-04-03|oldid3=422034811|date4=2012-04-03|oldid4=485278896|date5=2014-04-03|oldid5=602374313|date6=2016-04-03|oldid6=713325493|date7=2018-04-03|oldid7=834032350|date8=2020-04-03|oldid8=948525242}}
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1=
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1=
{{WikiProject Biography|living=no|class=GA|politician-priority=Top|core=yes|politician-work-group=yes|listas=Stalin, Joseph|military-work-group=y|military-priority=Low}}
{{WikiProject Biography|living=no|class=GA|politician-priority=Top|core=yes|politician-work-group=yes|listas=Stalin, Joseph|military-work-group=y|military-priority=Top}}
{{WikiProject Socialism|class=GA|importance=Top}}
{{WikiProject Socialism|class=GA|importance=Top}}
{{WikiProject Soviet Union|class=GA|importance=Top}}
{{WikiProject Soviet Union|class=GA|importance=Top}}

Revision as of 14:42, 13 May 2020

Template:Vital article

Former featured article candidateJoseph Stalin is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination failed. For older candidates, please check the archive.
Good articleJoseph Stalin has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 18, 2004Featured article candidateNot promoted
November 7, 2018Good article nomineeListed
Current status: Former featured article candidate, current good article

Drunkenly

I think it's fairly clear, from context, that a man who's an alcoholic is "drunkenly" beating his family. Our readers are generally intelligent, and if the article says he simultaneously began drinking hard and beating people the connection is self-evident. Adding unnecessary details like that is not only not helpful, it actively detracts from the article by adding excess verbosity; detailing whether or not he was drunk while doing so is entirely unnecessary.The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 09:36, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think it is clear. A man who is an alcoholic can do many things when he's sober. I don't think one adverb is excess verbosity. Why not leave it as is?--Jack Upland (talk) 09:43, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
It's not the biggest deal ever, to be sure, but "Omit needless words" is sound advice. I think it's excessively specific. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 11:18, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]