Talk:Deloitte: Difference between revisions
ClueBot III (talk | contribs) m Archiving 1 discussion to Talk:Deloitte/Archives/2017. (BOT) |
|||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
:I'm unsure what an "EDD" is in this context, but there's nothing in the article anymore about a delayed payment. The remaining cases in this section seem to be [[WP:GNG|notable]] and should be kept. [[User:Zazpot|Zazpot]] ([[User talk:Zazpot|talk]]) 21:45, 9 November 2017 (UTC) |
:I'm unsure what an "EDD" is in this context, but there's nothing in the article anymore about a delayed payment. The remaining cases in this section seem to be [[WP:GNG|notable]] and should be kept. [[User:Zazpot|Zazpot]] ([[User talk:Zazpot|talk]]) 21:45, 9 November 2017 (UTC) |
||
== External links modified == |
|||
Hello fellow Wikipedians, |
|||
I have just modified one external link on [[Deloitte]]. Please take a moment to review [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=799532154 my edit]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit [[User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot|this simple FaQ]] for additional information. I made the following changes: |
|||
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160125185555/http://www.thecourt.ca/2016/01/19/livent-v-deloitte-has-the-fat-lady-finally-sung/ to http://www.thecourt.ca/2016/01/19/livent-v-deloitte-has-the-fat-lady-finally-sung/ |
|||
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs. |
|||
{{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}} |
|||
Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot|Report bug]])</span> 08:27, 8 September 2017 (UTC) |
|||
==Cherry-picking negative information== |
==Cherry-picking negative information== |
Revision as of 02:06, 8 September 2020
![]() | This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
![]() | This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
![]() Archives (Index) |
This page is archived by ClueBot III.
|
Criticism EDD
The whole section is a bit much and reminds me of those complaint sites, but the EDD about a one time delayed payment falls under not notable one time events. There are alternative outlets outside of Wikipedia to air grievances.--WatchingContent (talk) 19:17, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
- I agree. The whole thing looks like a giant scarlet letter. Superkatlover (talk) 21:38, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
- I'm unsure what an "EDD" is in this context, but there's nothing in the article anymore about a delayed payment. The remaining cases in this section seem to be notable and should be kept. Zazpot (talk) 21:45, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
Cherry-picking negative information
I am in the process of vetting the "Controversy" section and have discovered that large amounts of the information and negative sources have been cherry-picked to make Deloitte look bad. I am adding a warning tag, as this is going to take a long time to clean up. Superkatlover (talk) 22:06, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
- No drive by tagging please. If you think you can improve the section then please do so rather than leaving it to others. Dormskirk (talk) 23:33, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
- I am actually working very hard to correct the bias by removing bad sources and finding good ones. It is slow going as I am not experienced at this. Superkatlover (talk) 07:05, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- "
large amounts of the information and negative sources have been cherry-picked to make Deloitte look bad
" - that's quite a brazen assertion. Please remember to assume good faith. Zazpot (talk) 12:33, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
Proposed merge with GovLab
not notable enough for a separate article DGG ( talk ) 23:07, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
- Support merge. Dormskirk (talk) 23:17, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
- In the absense of any objections I have merged the more notable material into this article.Dormskirk (talk) 19:00, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 13:37, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
Hauptsitz
There seems to be some confusion as to where the international firm is headquartered. My understanding is that Deloitte & Touche LLP (in which the US firm sits) is based in New York see and Deloitte LLP (in which the UK firm sits) is based in London see. Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited (the international firm which both these LLPs are part of) is based in London. see. Happy to consider alternative evidence. Dormskirk (talk) 14:02, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Family
It's a French name. French ancestries? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.91.51.235 (talk) 05:07, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
- See William Welch Deloitte for the ancestry of the founder. Dormskirk (talk) 09:53, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
Lead doesn't cover all important aspects
Sorry, I tagged it but then had to go out. Se WP:LEAD. As it stands, the lead doesn't mention anything about controversies. "The lead serves as an introduction to the article and a summary of its most important contents." " It should identify the topic, establish context, explain why the topic is notable, and summarize the most important points, including any prominent controversies." @Dormskirk: I hope you see my point. Right now the is too short, doesn't cover all that it should, and stretches what should be at most two paragraphs out to three. Doug Weller talk 09:11, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
- OK. I see your point and will add a bit more on history and something on controversies in particular. Thanks for explaining. Dormskirk (talk) 09:13, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
- @Doug Weller: I have had a go at expanding the lead. I hope it is OK now. Best wishes. Dormskirk (talk) 10:35, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
- @Dormskirk: I'm really impressed. You've done an excellent job, it's a much better lead. Thanks. Doug Weller talk 11:14, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
- @Doug Weller: Great. Many thanks for your kind words. Dormskirk (talk) 11:18, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
- Wikipedia articles that use American English
- C-Class WikiProject Business articles
- Mid-importance WikiProject Business articles
- C-Class Accounting articles
- Accounting articles
- WikiProject Business articles
- C-Class company articles
- Mid-importance company articles
- WikiProject Companies articles
- C-Class New York City articles
- Low-importance New York City articles
- WikiProject New York City articles