Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Makokis: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Praxidicae (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Cyberbot I (talk | contribs) Automated comment: AfD was not correctly transcluded. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8)) |
||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
*'''Strong keep''' Wikipedia is woefully lacking in articles about indigineous people and this article is about a notable individual. See [https://newsinteractives.cbc.ca/longform/a-cree-doctors-caring-approach-for-transgender-patients this] which is more than significant coverage, as is [https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/2019/09/19/our-existences-are-political-what-it-means-that-gay-indigenous-couple-won-canadas-amazing-race/ this]. [[User:Praxidicae|Praxidicae]] ([[User talk:Praxidicae|talk]]) 17:44, 14 December 2020 (UTC) |
*'''Strong keep''' Wikipedia is woefully lacking in articles about indigineous people and this article is about a notable individual. See [https://newsinteractives.cbc.ca/longform/a-cree-doctors-caring-approach-for-transgender-patients this] which is more than significant coverage, as is [https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/2019/09/19/our-existences-are-political-what-it-means-that-gay-indigenous-couple-won-canadas-amazing-race/ this]. [[User:Praxidicae|Praxidicae]] ([[User talk:Praxidicae|talk]]) 17:44, 14 December 2020 (UTC) |
||
*<small>'''Automated comment:''' This AfD was not correctly [[WP:TRANSCLUDE|transcluded]] to the log ([[WP:AFDHOWTO|step 3]]). I have transcluded it to [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2020 December 14]]. —[[User:Cyberbot I|<sup style="color:green;font-family:Courier">cyberbot I</sup>]]<small><sub style="margin-left:-13.5ex;color:green;font-family:Comic Sans MS">[[User talk:Cyberbot I|<span style="color:green">Talk to my owner</span>]]:Online</sub></small> 17:55, 14 December 2020 (UTC)</small><!--Cyberbot I relist--> |
Revision as of 17:55, 14 December 2020
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- James Makokis (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
People notable for only one event/ WP:BLP1E We generally should avoid having an article on a person when each of three conditions is met, Subjects meets all 3 points:
- 1. If reliable sources cover the person only in the context of a single event.
- 2. If that person otherwise remains, and is likely to remain, a low-profile individual. Biographies in these cases can give undue weight to the event and conflict with neutral point of view. In such cases, it is usually better to merge the information and redirect the person's name to the event article.
- 3. If the event is not significant or the individual's role was either not substantial or not well documented. John Hinckley Jr., for example, has a separate article because the single event he was associated with, the Reagan assassination attempt, was significant and his role was both substantial and well documented.
- Strong keep Wikipedia is woefully lacking in articles about indigineous people and this article is about a notable individual. See this which is more than significant coverage, as is this. Praxidicae (talk) 17:44, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2020 December 14. —cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 17:55, 14 December 2020 (UTC)