Talk:Nyingchi: Difference between revisions
Pasdecomplot (talk | contribs) Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit |
|||
Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
Also notable, the edit summary does not mention the simultaneous revert of edits in "Tourism" section, which has already been presented in talk [https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Nyingchi#Tourism] for {{u|Esiymbro}}. Looking forward to building consensus and understanding where the issues are - in both talk discussions. [[User:Pasdecomplot|Pasdecomplot]] ([[User talk:Pasdecomplot|talk]]) 23:15, 18 December 2020 (UTC) |
Also notable, the edit summary does not mention the simultaneous revert of edits in "Tourism" section, which has already been presented in talk [https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Nyingchi#Tourism] for {{u|Esiymbro}}. Looking forward to building consensus and understanding where the issues are - in both talk discussions. [[User:Pasdecomplot|Pasdecomplot]] ([[User talk:Pasdecomplot|talk]]) 23:15, 18 December 2020 (UTC) |
||
:You will need to make the case at [[WP:RS/N]] that ''The Tibetan Review'' (which has strangely been cited in a Google sites link) is RS, and not simply because you said so or [[WP:ILIKEIT|like it]] for its political bent. <span style="color: #8B0000">Caradhras</span>Aiguo (<small>[[User talk:CaradhrasAiguo|leave language]]</small>) 23:21, 18 December 2020 (UTC) |
Revision as of 23:22, 18 December 2020
{{WikiProject banner shell}}
to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.![]() | Tibet Stub‑class Low‑importance | |||||||||
|
{{WikiProject banner shell}}
to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.![]() | China Stub‑class Low‑importance | |||||||||
|
map
user:虞海 recently changed the svg map I made back to the old less detailed png one, with no comment. On this page and also on Lhoka Prefecture and Nagqu Prefecture. I fail to understand why this was done. If there is not some reason I will change them back to the svg version.
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/ce/Nyingchi_Prefecture_map.svg/300px-Nyingchi_Prefecture_map.svg.png)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/70/Map_of_Nyingchi.png/300px-Map_of_Nyingchi.png)
--Keithonearth (talk) 08:17, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
- No explanation? I'm changing back to the svg version, on all the pages. --Keithonearth (talk) 06:11, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
Move discussion in progress
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Lhasa which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 22:44, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
External links modified (January 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Nyingchi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080908035013/http://www.nyingchi.com/ to http://www.nyingchi.com/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:37, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Tourism
Readded RS and edits in Tourism section, as a balance to edits on "prosperous model villages", which the RS states are "fake Tibetan 'model villages' ". Multiple sources state the same criticism, including Tsering Woeser as well as Tibetans interviewed by sources which can be used only as inline sources. The RS Tibetan Political Review is valid, and it's intro as a view on tourism attempts to address the rather unclear issue of what is majority and minority view as per UNDUE. After reading various sources over the last few months, it seems that the majority of Tibetans agree with the strong criticism - that their culture is being turned into a "theme park" for "Chinese tourists". Thus, the edit is relevant and per RS. Pasdecomplot (talk) 11:01, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
"Political re-education awaits monks and nuns..."
About the revert: the RS has political re-education in its title, not "detention". So, political re-education is the accurate term. If the issue is with the word "camp", that would be another issue than what the edit summary states. The title and RS also state monks and nuns, not just nuns. So, "Detention of Larung Gar nuns" is not an accurate section title per RS. The deleted text which is accurate per RS includes, The Tibetan Review states that some nuns and monks are under "continued political re-education ", while those allowed to return home face six additional months of political re-education, and are not permitted to rejoin monastic institutions.
Also notable, the edit summary does not mention the simultaneous revert of edits in "Tourism" section, which has already been presented in talk [1] for Esiymbro. Looking forward to building consensus and understanding where the issues are - in both talk discussions. Pasdecomplot (talk) 23:15, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
- You will need to make the case at WP:RS/N that The Tibetan Review (which has strangely been cited in a Google sites link) is RS, and not simply because you said so or like it for its political bent. CaradhrasAiguo (leave language) 23:21, 18 December 2020 (UTC)