Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trapezoid E

Trapezoid E

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet GNG. Insufficient in-depth sig cov. The only source is a database listing. Searching finds mirrors of the database, mirrors of this article, and another fountain/sculpture of the same name. Since neither the artist nor the building where it is located have articles, no good target for a merge/redirect either MB 01:16, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. MB 01:16, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Oregon-related deletion discussions. MB 01:16, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It would be possible to merge Trapezoid E and TriMet (sculpture), with some additional sourcing on Maki in to a single article that does meet the notability guidelines.Maki himself would meet WP:NARTIST, with his work in at least two museum collections: the Seattle Art Museum (SAM) [1] and the Smithsonian American Art Museum (SAAM) [2]. The oldest review of his work that I've been able to find is from September 1969. [3]. From what I can quickly tell, Sculpture (magazine) has done a feature on him [4] Vexations (talk) 18:59, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I've added a few sources, and posted a few more on the article's talk page. Might need to visit a library or two, once open, to do more research. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 19:51, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 03:11, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Merge - The article does not offer enough to stand on its own; however, the article for the mentioned courthouse already has an art section. This could be merged into that section. Coopman86 (talk) 07:37, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]