User talk:The Unsinkable Molly Brown

Why repeated image removals?

You seem to be finding reasons to remove as many images as possible from the Falcon 9 list pages. Can you please discuss issues with the article on the talk page? Ergzay (talk) 21:35, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Ergzay: I'll open a discussion on Talk:List of Falcon 9 first-stage boosters to note the removal of a non-free image, then. — Molly Brown (talk) 04:02, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Project Spaceflight!

		The SPFLT Achievement Patch
		Thank you for joining with a running start! Neopeius (talk) 13:30, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Changes to info boxes

Per WP:ENGAGE

If you are changing content (and not simply reverting vandalism) and someone reverts you, you should start a discussion on the talk page if you want to restore your change, following our Bold, Revert, Discuss (BRD) cycle. Although this approach is not official policy, most editors agree it is the best way to deal with editing disputes and it is based on existing policy. Restoring your edits multiple times without consensus is a form of disruptive editing and edit warring, which can get you blocked. You have two options: make a good-faith effort to discuss and wait for consensus before any further action, or stop reverting completely. There is no third option. Ng.j (talk) 13:49, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Ng.j: I should bring up that I and another editor tried the patience option with CRS-20 before, and it simply didn't work. However, I'm just not mentally prepared to take them to the Administrators' noticeboard as was recommended to me earlier if CRS-20 performed unexplained reverts of my edits again. — Molly Brown (talk) 16:07, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Is Transformational Solar Array A Experiment Under ROSA or is a separate entity?

Is Transformational Solar Array A Experiment Under ROSA or is a separate entity? https://dart.jhuapl.edu/Mission/Impactor-Spacecraft.php i cannot know if they are different or not please assist me. if different do we need a separate page. though both are different, they are made by JHAPL only Chinakpradhan (talk) 16:52, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Chinakpradhan: I wouldn't have the faintest idea on this kind of stuff. Apologies. — Molly Brown (talk) 00:44, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confusion on naming prichal ports

@The Unsinkable Molly Brown: I used the docking table you made on nauka page on prichal page. There you wrote name of ports like nadir port, forward port etc. So will I use for prichal port docking port 'Port port'. So please suggest a better name The Unsinkable Molly Brown.Chinakpradhan (talk) 14:24, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Chinakpradhan: You seem to have already resolved this issue by calling it "portside port", so I don't see why you felt the need to come to my talk page just to complain about it. A simple note in an edit summary would've sufficed. Alternatively, articles such as Unity (ISS module) omit the "port" qualifier entirely, so if you want to do that instead, there's a precedent for that, too. — Molly Brown (talk) 14:47, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@The Unsinkable Molly Brown: problem was that using portside port was not good as I then need to write starboard side nadir side etc. But thanks for the unity module solution Chinakpradhan (talk) 15:16, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Unsinkable Molly Brown, one more problem is that will i go with the name of the progress spacecraft M-UM, that is a progress m variant or is it progress ms variant. the roscosmos page on node says The instrument-and-assembly compartment by design corresponds to the instrument-assembly compartment of the base ship "Progress M" with modifications to increase its rigidity and strength in connection with the ship's mass increased to 8,180 kg. so what is better to follow progress m(modified) or progress ms(modified). problem is even on anatoly's page he once wrote m then ms then again m + prichal+progress m-um was maybe constructed in m era but delays may have made it ms. though it is just a problem to include s or not. the versons are too different. so please tell the correct naming Chinakpradhan (talk) 04:03, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Chinakpradhan: This is an interesting issue. I've unfortunately haven't found any concrete sources on whether this spacecraft is a variant of Progress MS or considered its own variant. I'd say we should slap some citation needed spans, so that attention can be brought to the issue and other editors can perhaps help solve this dillema. — Molly Brown (talk) 10:28, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Unsinkable Molly Brown will it be effective as least men visit the page see iss page I saw too much in its talk page but nobody answers Chinakpradhan (talk) 13:03, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Unsinkable Molly Brown can you determine the result on this article based on the information i have published in that discussion Chinakpradhan (talk) 07:56, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Unsinkable Molly Brown, can you please help to tweak the prichal module page's development section if you can. Chinakpradhan (talk) 15:17, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You can also tweak other sections but please don't remove the external images no actual image alternative for them is there or will be there by the new Russian law Chinakpradhan (talk) 15:20, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Individual space vehicle infobox

Molly Brown, maam it was ok that you changed the infoboxe individual space vehicle but i have a kind request. maam please add a place for logo in that page Chinakpradhan (talk) 15:11, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

and please submit me a list of all pages using this template i need to add details in all pages Chinakpradhan (talk) 15:56, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Molly Brown, actually the case is that i dont know how many pages got affected but maam while doing rough changes you forgot to add succession by class previous and next to the pages and so disruption has occured that need to be fixed i am fixing but please tell the names of pages using that template or fix them yourself maam Chinakpradhan (talk) 16:10, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Chinakpradhan: I would appreciate it if you didn't incessantly spam my talk page with all sorts of demands and requests. I do not have the answers to everything, nor the ability to fix every problem you have. With that said, the changes made to Template:Infobox individual space vehicle were deliberate. They were made to reduce the otherwise often bloated sizes of infoboxes, and to condense information as concisely as possible. Most information pertaining to the mission and not specifically the spacecraft should be deligated to the mission article's infobox, and not the spacecraft article's infobox. I apologise if this was not clear earlier. — Molly Brown (talk) 02:01, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]