Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nuclear Rabbit (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:37, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nuclear Rabbit

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet criteria at WP:NBAND. Cannot seem to locate any significant, independent, reliable coverage online. -Liance^{talk/contribs} 21:49, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -Liance^{talk/contribs} 21:49, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, zero sourcing found. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 22:06, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:21, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Band is only notable at the local level. TH1980 (talk) 01:48, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - They have been around for a long time with a lot of albums, and bassist Jean Baudin has gotten some notice for his chops, but the band is described as "underground" for a reason. Despite their long career they have not graduated beyond the usual industry directories and retail/streaming sites. They have many listings but I can find nothing significant and reliable from robust journalistic sources. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 14:58, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Note - The band survived two previous AfDs but not in ways that matter now. The first was in 2008 when a band's article could be kept with basic evidence that they existed. The second was a weak "no consensus" in 2011 because one voter admitted to being undecided. Both of those procedures have changed in the years since. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 15:00, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - despite a respectable number of views, there's a lack of significant reliable sources according to Google. Chumpih ^t 20:25, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not notable. Unfortunately, as they sound awesome based on the (soon-to-be deleted :)) article. But no reliable sources are available. GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 10:00, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Heartmusic678 (talk) 12:17, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom fails WP:GNG and WP:NBAND.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 09:00, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.