Jump to content

User talk:103.52.135.63

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Tamzin (talk | contribs) at 09:42, 12 May 2022 (→‎May 2022: re). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

May 2022

Stop icon with clock
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for block evasion.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.   -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 09:26, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.
wehich block evasion 103.52.135.63 (talk) 09:28, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
any proof 103.52.135.63 (talk) 09:28, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Tamzin: 103.52.135.63 (talk) 09:29, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
you cannot block someone for such wierd and vague reasons. proof your accusations or leave your adminship. 103.52.135.63 (talk) 09:32, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
At Special:PageHistory/Asjad Raza Khan you were spamming [1] [2] the same links as Benin antidota (talk · contribs) [3] [4]. Benin antidota is locked globally as a sockpuppet of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Khadim ahlesunnah waljamaah. You must thus be either a sockpuppet of KAW or a meatpuppet, and when a sockpuppet cannot be distinguished from a meatpuppet, we treat them as a sockpuppet. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 09:33, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
ridiculous, who is benin antidiota now? 103.52.135.63 (talk) 09:34, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
you are new admin here you should be using your tools very judiciously. otherwise you will be desyspped soon. Insha Allah . Also not to mention that your rfa was most controversial. 103.52.135.63 (talk) 09:35, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Second-most controversial, but who's counting. You can appeal this block as described above. If unblocked, you are welcome to seek to compel a reconfirmation RfA by demonstrating to me or an uninvolved bureaucrat that I have lost the community's trust. I have nothing else to say here, though, unless pinged by a reviewing admin. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 09:42, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]