Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2013 February 23

< February 22	February 24 >

February 23

File:OnFireBigBandWithJamesMorrison.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Image is low resolution, found in a few places online including here. Used on The Salvation Army, Sydney Congress Hall. Looks to be set up for use on web. The content in the linked article is scarily similar to the content on the above page. Quite possibly a copyvio. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 00:43, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, using archive.org, that image has been in use on the page you found since at least September 2008. It was uploaded here in October 2008. Deleted. --B (talk) 03:39, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:SI and DySI.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan personal image of no encyclopedic value -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 00:48, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Policy of notability does not apply to free images. Policy of non-orphaned images does not apply to free images, as freedom for such images can be given for use on userspace, for example. For policy on free images, see WP:IUP. Optakeover ^(Talk) 16:24, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Unidentified people, so out of scope for Commons. Unused, so useless for English Wikipedia. See WP:NOTHOST. --Stefan2 (talk) 15:17, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sec 1 Camp 169.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan personal image of no encyclopedic value -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 00:48, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Policy of notability does not apply to free images. Policy of non-orphaned images does not apply to free images, as freedom for such images can be given for use on userspace, for example. For policy on free images, see WP:IUP. Optakeover ^(Talk) 16:24, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Unidentified people, so out of scope for Commons. Unused, so useless for English Wikipedia. See WP:NOTHOST. --Stefan2 (talk) 15:18, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:UTC Bunk Inspection.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: not deleted as this one seems useful for an encyclopedia article. --B (talk) 00:12, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan personal image of no encyclopedic value -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 00:48, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Policy of notability does not apply to free images. Policy of non-orphaned images does not apply to free images, as freedom for such images can be given for use on userspace, for example. For policy on free images, see WP:IUP. Optakeover ^(Talk) 16:24, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Would this be useful in Saint Joseph's Institution, Singapore? That article currently only has a photo of a statue. --Stefan2 (talk) 15:20, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sock Thief.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan personal image of no encyclopedic value -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 00:48, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Policy of notability does not apply to free images. Policy of non-orphaned images does not apply to free images, as freedom for such images can be given for use on userspace, for example. For policy on free images, see WP:IUP. Optakeover ^(Talk) 16:25, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Unidentified people at an unidentified location, so out of scope for Commons. Unused, so useless for Wikipedia. Potential defamation: the file name suggests that the people on the photo might be accused for being sock thieves. See WP:NOTHOST and WP:CSD#G10. --Stefan2 (talk) 15:23, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Outstanding Achievement Award.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan personal image of no encyclopedic value -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 00:48, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Policy of notability does not apply to free images. Policy of non-orphaned images does not apply to free images, as freedom for such images can be given for use on userspace, for example. For policy on free images, see WP:IUP. Optakeover ^(Talk) 16:25, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Unidentified people, location and award, so out of scope for Commons. Unused, so useless for Wikipedia. See WP:NOTHOST. --Stefan2 (talk) 15:26, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:OvationCeleb.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan image of poor quality (extremely blurry). Nothing notable about the guitar, even has broken string methinks. No forseeable use. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 00:50, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Policy of notability does not apply to free images. Policy of non-orphaned images does not apply to free images, as freedom for such images can be given for use on userspace, for example. For policy on free images, see WP:IUP. Optakeover ^(Talk) 16:26, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Very blurry image. Commons has many better images (see Commons:Category:Guitars and Commons:Template:Blurry), so out of scope for Commons. Unused on Wikipedia, so useless here too. Sure, people can upload a few blurry and otherwise useless images for use on their userpages (see Commons:Template:User page image), but this image is currently not used for that purpose. Can be undeleted if the uploader later wants to put the image on his user page. --Stefan2 (talk) 15:34, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ParkerJephSunday1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan image, no direct proof of author. Image has no information, is useless and of poor quality. This upload is one of two live edits of the uploader -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 00:51, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:RaisingHopeIntertitle.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Obselete, non-free. Replaced with File:RaisingHopeTitleCard.jpg on article Raising Hope because it does not display a watermark. thesimsmania 02:59, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Patrick Bergin Stylized.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan image with no encyclopedic value. Resolution is set for web, is found on a multitude of websites including here. Unknown original source -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 04:53, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Poi002.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan image with no author, could be replaced by plain text (although not English), -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 05:00, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Relascope.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned image is an uncropped version of File:Relascope 2.JPG. This version is unnecessary. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 06:10, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Policy of at-least-one-article-use does not apply to free images. Since it is not a non-free image and the author did not request for it, it does not have to be deleted.Optakeover ^(Talk) 16:19, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete WP:NOTHOST. Unused and doesn't look useful considering that the other image is available. Ideally, both should be deleted and replaced by SVG, but until someone has made an SVG version, we need to keep the other image. --Stefan2 (talk) 15:37, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Remawtab.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan image is for a former userspace draft of an idea for a plugin to wikipedia. Does not seem to be needed anymore. Uploader has been inactive for over a year. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 06:15, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Policy of notability does not apply to free images. Policy of non-orphaned images does not apply to free images. For policy on free images, see WP:IUP. Optakeover ^(Talk) 16:20, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Unused image of unknown purpose. See WP:NOTHOST. --Stefan2 (talk) 15:38, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Roger in 2007.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan image of unknown person. Only live edit of uploader. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 06:22, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Policy of notability does not apply to free images. Policy of non-orphaned images does not apply to free images. For policy on free images, see WP:IUP. Optakeover ^(Talk) 16:21, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Unidentified person, so out of scope for Commons. Unused, so useless here. See WP:NOTHOST. --Stefan2 (talk) 15:40, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ROZAGY by the grand piano.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan image is from a non-notable british musician. Article about her was deleted as a PROD. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 06:26, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Un roots manuva camden.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan image of non-notable band. Summary includes link to here. Photo has low resolution, might not be owned by uploader. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 06:29, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Reggiimental 2008.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan image is of non-notable musician. No value here -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 06:30, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Policy of notability does not apply to free images. Policy of non-orphaned images does not apply to free images, as freedom for such images can be given for use on userspace, for example. For policy on free images, see WP:IUP. Optakeover ^(Talk) 16:23, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment This is a derivative work of File:N649720124 3475885 8494.jpg. Nonsense filenames sometimes indicate that the files have been copied from other websites. I don't recognise this file name syntax, though. --Stefan2 (talk) 15:43, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:RTKAL.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan image of non-notable musician. No value here. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 06:31, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Policy of notability does not apply to free images. Policy of non-orphaned images does not apply to free images, as freedom for such images can be given for use on userspace, for example. For policy on free images, see WP:IUP. Optakeover ^(Talk) 16:23, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Monmouth Troy railway station 2180845 175388bb.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:07, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Photographer has withdrawn image from Geograph as it is a flopped version of Brimscombe station http://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/3343136 which he had misidentified 87.112.64.14 (talk) 12:59, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Jacob Porathur.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unused photo of a person. The corresponding article (Jacob Porathur) was deleted almost three years ago for lack of notability; see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jacob Porathur. There is no further encyclopedic use for this image. —Bkell (talk) 15:06, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:AFCW-Uniform-DEN.PNG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: revert to revision of December 23, 2007, revert description page to mark as free, delete all unfree revisions. Chick Bowen 01:45, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Tagged with {{subst:rfu}}, but the tag was removed. This is a drawing of utilitarian objects (not copyrightable in the United States, see Commons:COM:UA) and logos which are either in the public domain (see Commons:COM:TOO) or de minimis. This can be replaced by a freely licensed image of the same clothes.

According to Special:PermanentLink/177152437, the initial file was a freely licensed drawing by Silent Wind of Doom (talk · contribs), but it seems that this drawing later was deleted per WP:CSD#F5 (which is not correct since F5 only applies to non-free files). Thus, this is replaceable by the initial revision of the file. I'm not sure how much later uploaders have changed or whether the differences between that file and the current one are below the threshold of originality or not. Stefan2 (talk) 14:06, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why don't you just request an undeletion of the original file? F5 cases normally wouldn't qualify, but this is an unusual situation because of the possibility that it could be replaced with a deleted image. That way, you'll easily see that you were right or that you were wrong; no need for an FFD. Nyttend (talk) 14:45, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have undeleted the earliest two revisions, which are free. They are different from the current one, I think (the pants look different). I will relist this for further discussion. Chick Bowen 16:28, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Chick Bowen 16:28, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Testimage.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G2 by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:04, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan image with no encyclopedic value. If the information was needed (and could be appropriately sourced) it would work better as a wikitable. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 19:21, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete DB-TEST. testimage would indicate a test -- 65.92.180.137 (talk) 01:26, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Tr1chfl.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

unusued logo for a FC on the Central Highlands Football League article page which has been replaced by better quality jerseys -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 22:03, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ng1chfl.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

unusued logo for a FC on the Central Highlands Football League article page which has been replaced by better quality jerseys -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 22:03, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Se1chfl.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

unusued logo for a FC on the Central Highlands Football League article page which has been replaced by better quality jerseys -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 22:03, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Tussac.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan personal photo with no encyclopedic value, poor quality -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 22:18, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Greek Empire.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan image looks to be a map of the location Macedonia (ancient kingdom) and is replaced by other better maps. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 22:22, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Two windows.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan image of no encyclopedic value. No source for the graph information, no relevant description for value -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 22:25, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.