User talk:ToBeFree

Please click here to add a new message!

^{To add this button to your own talk page, you can use {{User new message large}}. It can easily be modified: Colorful examples are provided on the "Template:User new message large" page.}

Please note that you are currently not logged in.

This is not a general problem – you can leave a message anyway, but your IP address might change during the discussion, and I might end up talking to a wall. Creating an account does not require an e-mail address; all you need is a password and a name. You are not required to do this, but please consider creating an account before starting long-term interactions with other users. Thank you very much in advance.

Archives
[megabytes]

1, 2, 3, 4

Bot

Hi ToBeFree, I'm not sure where to raise this issue: Could you take a look at User:YeYen KY-Bot? As the account is not active, I'm not sure if its violating the Bot policy, but it's definitely not approved [1]. Johannnes89 (talk) 10:56, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

See also: User talk:YeYen KY where the operator has not removed the tag even though the user was asked to remove it but to no avail. Iggy (Swan) (Contribs) 13:44, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Johannnes89 and Iggy the Swan, thank you very much. While the bot policy does allow operating a bot in one's own userspace without approval, and while the username policy prohibits bot names only for non-bots, I think there is an (unrelated) issue. They seem to be an experienced user operating a secondary troll account, looking at their fake Huggle summaries. I'll keep an eye on them. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:03, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jason Stanley

I'm not involved in this one. Just giving you a heads-up that it looks like recent editors at Jason Stanley could use some guidance. –Skywatcher68 (talk) 14:34, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Skywatcher68, thank you very much for the notification. That's interesting. Hmm. Of all the editors's behaviors there, Cacatcat10's behavior is the most concerning to me at the moment. It seems to have started with Special:Diff/1084443005 based on primary, self-published/user-generated sources, and continued with an insistence to push this content back into the article after reverts. Experienced users have then been making more-or-less helpful reverts in both directions, and now two unregistered editors are having a slow-motion edit war over the content.

The last talk page message is from 2020! ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:17, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have denied any involvement in any incident that I have been involved in. If I am blocked permanently, is there a possibility that I can deactivate my account. Megacheez (talk) 14:10, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]