Jump to content

User talk:Ahatd

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Ahatd (talk | contribs) at 10:39, 19 August 2022 (→‎August 2022 2: thanked). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Please use my talk page rather than emailing me.

If I left a message on your talk page, please reply there. If you initiate contact here, I will respond here.

Put new messages at the bottom. I will not notice them at the top.

Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Fields Medal on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 21:30, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Javed Chaudhry has been accepted

Javed Chaudhry, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Missvain (talk) 21:36, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: History and geography request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Astrology on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 20:30, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dcode for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dcode is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dcode until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Alyo (chat·edits) 19:28, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red in August 2022

Women in Red August 2022, Vol 8, Issue 8, Nos 214, 217, 236, 237, 238, 239


Online events:


See also:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 10:57, 29 July 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:31, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red

Hi there, Ahatd, and welcome to Women in Red. It's good to see you now intend to devote some of your editing time to articles about women. In connection with women's biographies, you might find it useful to look through our Ten Simple Rules. As you seem to be interested in journalists from Pakistan, you might find some interesting names by browsing through our Redlist index. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 11:28, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This Redlist index will help me alot! Many thanks. AHatd (talk) 12:10, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 1 August 2022

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes – Issue 51

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 51, May – June 2022

  • New library partners
    • SAGE Journals
    • Elsevier ScienceDirect
    • University of Chicago Press
    • Information Processing Society of Japan
  • Feedback requested on this newsletter
  • 1Lib1Ref May 2022

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --16:45, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Editor making rapid, nonsense !votes at AfD and refusing to accept new sports SNG. Thank you. StAnselm (talk) 18:24, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Time to disclose paid works, like Dingtone, etc.

Information icon

Hello Ahatd. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Ahatd. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Ahatd|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. 86.24.42.66 (talk) 16:09, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

86.24.42.66, thanks for heavy lifting mate. You caught a really big fish! I'm being paid to edit all pages I edit, lol. Just recently got hired by WP:WiR to create biographies of women. Idk how to disclose COI, Why don't you come over with your original account and guide me to do so... I'll be very thankful for such a kind act. Till then I'll be continuing my paid work, with my current employer WP:WPWIR. Your thankful, Ahated (talk!) 18:25, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Prince (2022 film)

Hello, Ahatd,

Please do not give instructions to an inexperienced editor on speedy deleting a main space redirect to replace it with a declined Draft article. The draft is in no shape to be moved to main space and I blocked the editor from this page for a few days. You probably should have checked out the Draft article before recommending it be moved to main space. Thanks. Liz Read! Talk! 06:45, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Liz, I accept I never checked the draft, which is my bad. But I never recommended them to move declined draft to the mainspace, but shown them the right way to do so. I saw them struggling to understand cut/paste moves and right way to move the page, and edit warring another editor, so I told them how they can do (what they intended to do) in right way. Thanks. Ahated (talk!) 07:06, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kiran Naz moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Kiran Naz, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DIVINE (talk) 12:36, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank alot @DIVINE. Never realized my mistake until I saw your message. I was actually surfing the internet to find notable female Pakistani anchors, and creating a userspace page for them, just to save it as future reference. Thanks for correcting my mistake... Cheers. Ahated (talk!) 13:28, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It's alright. Your article is not removed just because it is moved to the draft. On the draft page, you can expand your article before submitting it. DIVINE (talk) 13:34, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022

Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have a financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. For that request to be considered, you must:

  • Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
  • State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
  • Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future.
GeneralNotability (talk) 23:00, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ahatd (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

@GeneralNotability Idk if you are aware of sarcasm or not. But I'll like to let you know that Women in Red is WikiProject here on Wikipedia, active to create women biographies to lessen systematic bias against women. And you know what, it's quite funny to assume that a WikiProject is paying contributors to create biographies. And I'll ask you to relook this reply, this isn't in any way a self admit. :Secondly, I'll add that I do have conflict of interest (in very strict terms) with a few topics, like Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (I'm anti-PTI guy, who most likely have bias against them, that's why I try to refrain from editing PTI related pages), being fan of social media celebs I often tend to write about them (even someone went on to report me on the Admins' notice board, and opened SPI against me) but to note, I've known none of them in person or had any contact with them, except two — Eva zu Beck and Büşra Duran Gündüz, both (Eva and Büşra's representative) I met while they're touring my city Abbottabad. And it was nothing more than a few minutes chat, and I never had any contact with them afterwards. And this wasn't that much significant that I needed to express it on the Wikipedia. Still, It's quite evident from both pages, I've been very careful while creating both pages, kept everything very factual and less opinionated. :I've never received nor will receive any form financial compensation for the editing. I've never breached and violated WMF term of use. And please reconsider and re-look this reply, and the block. Thanks. :Ahated (talk!) 05:52, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Don't worry, there's more to the block than your failed attempt at sarcasm. I've also got a job ad for the creation of Büşra Duran Gündüz, which went up a little before you created that article, so I think there's a little more here than "just happened to meet them". GeneralNotability (talk) 01:16, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
GeneralNotability, I hope that your "a little before" is not only earlier than April 19th, 2022 (when I first created/started this draft), but also earlier than 14th April (when I became autoconfirmed on tr wikipedia, after only editing her page there). BTW I can also create advert, asking someone to block User:Ahatd on Wikipedia (obviously, will have dates, "a little before" of this block), will that be deemed enough evidence (let's just leave credibility aside; as you did) to block you or strip off your admin rights?
Secondly, if I'm not wrong, you just accepted that my reply to that anon (not sure if it was you or someone else idk) static IP was sarcastic, not a self admit? So was it right to use that as a blocking reason? ("Undisclosed paid editing in violation of the WMF Terms of Use - self-admitted.....)
Lastly, can I be given permission to edit this page, the way I can edit this talk page? Thanks. Ahated (talk!) 21:07, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User:Daniel Case, But per below has changed since then??? Ahated (talk!) 21:16, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I would put it in a new unblock request. Daniel Case (talk) 01:52, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Daniel Case actually I was bit frustrated at that moment. Now I realized that my comment was unnecessary. Sorry if I bothered you. Thanks. Ahated (talk!) 20:14, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not a problem. (But, per custom, another admin will have to review your new request). Daniel Case (talk) 22:00, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks :-) Ahated (talk!) 10:39, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2nd Unblock request

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Ahatd (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

First of all, I never admitted that I'm being paid to edit. I was never supposed to give a serious reply to an anon (with a static IP, and only two edits), asking me to disclose my supposedly paid edits. Sarcasm is a thing in this world! So being blocked for this not justifiable. Secondly, the blocking admin mentioned in the above discussion that there's a job ad which went up a little before than I created the page (19th April). I believe their "little before" is no way earlier than 14th April (A big 5 days diff!!!), when I first became autoconfirmed on tr Wikipedia, after editing only her page. This makes that adv untrustworthy and this block unjustifiable. Thanks. Ahated (talk!) 20:10, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=First of all, I never '''''admitted''''' that I'm being paid to edit. I was never supposed to give a serious reply to an anon (with a static IP, and only two edits), asking me to disclose my supposedly paid edits. Sarcasm is a thing in this world! So being blocked for this not justifiable. Secondly, the blocking admin mentioned in the above discussion that there's a job ad which went up '''a little before''' than I created the page (19th April). I believe their "'''little''' before" is no way earlier than 14th April (A big 5 days diff!!!), when I first became autoconfirmed on tr Wikipedia, after editing only her page. This makes that adv untrustworthy and this block unjustifiable. Thanks. [[User:Ahatd|<span style="background-color:Red; color:Black;">A</span><span style="background-color:Black; color:Red;">''hat<small><small>e</small></small>d''</span>]] ([[User talk:Ahatd|<span style="background-color:Green; color:White;">'''talk!'''</span>]]) 20:10, 18 August 2022 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=First of all, I never '''''admitted''''' that I'm being paid to edit. I was never supposed to give a serious reply to an anon (with a static IP, and only two edits), asking me to disclose my supposedly paid edits. Sarcasm is a thing in this world! So being blocked for this not justifiable. Secondly, the blocking admin mentioned in the above discussion that there's a job ad which went up '''a little before''' than I created the page (19th April). I believe their "'''little''' before" is no way earlier than 14th April (A big 5 days diff!!!), when I first became autoconfirmed on tr Wikipedia, after editing only her page. This makes that adv untrustworthy and this block unjustifiable. Thanks. [[User:Ahatd|<span style="background-color:Red; color:Black;">A</span><span style="background-color:Black; color:Red;">''hat<small><small>e</small></small>d''</span>]] ([[User talk:Ahatd|<span style="background-color:Green; color:White;">'''talk!'''</span>]]) 20:10, 18 August 2022 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=First of all, I never '''''admitted''''' that I'm being paid to edit. I was never supposed to give a serious reply to an anon (with a static IP, and only two edits), asking me to disclose my supposedly paid edits. Sarcasm is a thing in this world! So being blocked for this not justifiable. Secondly, the blocking admin mentioned in the above discussion that there's a job ad which went up '''a little before''' than I created the page (19th April). I believe their "'''little''' before" is no way earlier than 14th April (A big 5 days diff!!!), when I first became autoconfirmed on tr Wikipedia, after editing only her page. This makes that adv untrustworthy and this block unjustifiable. Thanks. [[User:Ahatd|<span style="background-color:Red; color:Black;">A</span><span style="background-color:Black; color:Red;">''hat<small><small>e</small></small>d''</span>]] ([[User talk:Ahatd|<span style="background-color:Green; color:White;">'''talk!'''</span>]]) 20:10, 18 August 2022 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ahatd&oldid=1105259616"