User talk:Katemeshi101
Welcome
|
National varieties of English
Hello. In a recent edit to the page Northumberland, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.
For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, India, or Pakistan use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the original author of the article used.
In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Hi! See, for example, Northumberland, Macavity and others. Sorry, but this is probably one of the quickest ways to start an undignified punch-up and is best avoided, at least for some time and preferably for ever! Happy editing. DBaK (talk) 16:31, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
Recent sources
Thanks for your improvements to Malnutrition. If you decide to keep working on it (please do – it needs it!), I hope you'll be able to find some more recent statistics. The WHO was focusing on that before the pandemic started, and hopefully were improving (and hopefully haven't gotten too much worse during the pandemic). Thank you again for working on that article. WhatamIdoing (talk) 20:08, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
August 2022
Your recent editing history at Self-care shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
You need to start using edit summaries and engage in discussion on the article's talk page before continuing to edit. PICKLEDICAE🥒 18:49, 31 August 2022 (UTC)