This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture articles
This article is part of WikiProject Websites, an attempt to create and link together articles about the major websites on the web. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.WebsitesWikipedia:WikiProject WebsitesTemplate:WikiProject WebsitesWebsites articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wikipedia, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's encyclopedic coverage of itself. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page. Please remember to avoid self-references and maintain a neutral point of view, even on topics relating to Wikipedia.WikipediaWikipedia:WikiProject WikipediaTemplate:WikiProject WikipediaWikipedia articles
A fact from Wikipediocracy appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 22 June 2013 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Did you know... that Wikipediocracy, a weblog and forum dedicated to criticizing Wikipedia, has assisted journalists reporting on controversies involving the online encyclopedia?
The following Wikipedia contributors may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
This article documents a site, Wikipediocracy, critical of Wikipedia. Its authorship includes, but is not limited to, both editors who participate jointly in both Wikipedia and Wikipediocracy, and editors critical of Wikipediocracy. Readers are reminded, per, the general disclaimer, "nothing found here has necessarily been reviewed by people with the expertise required to provide you with complete, accurate or reliable information." See also relevant policies and guidelines include Conflict of interest, Autobiography and Neutral point of view.
That's a good question. It's unclear to me whether the site is down for a day or two or down more permanently. I think the site is a big enough deal that if it's gone for good, it will be covered somewhere. How about we wait a few days and reassess, and if it's still gone and there still hasn't been any coverage of it, we can say something like "As of X date, the site is offline." Marquardtika (talk) 19:10, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
So the site's back up. Looks like it was just some sort of technical glitch. Happens to all websites from time to time--ahem, Facebook and Instagram yesterday!--so nothing needs to be changed in this article. Marquardtika (talk) 23:43, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
.svg){kind=icon}
