User talk:Partofthemachine

Debian GNU/NetBSD

Hi there. I saw you changed a long-standing redirect into a stub article, and then someone proposed its deletion. Since the topic has been stale for 15 years apparently, it's unlikely the article has WP:POTENTIAL. If you want to re-create it, please discuss it on the relevant Talk pages. If you need any help, please don't hesitate to reply on my Talk page. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 16:06, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:List of unicameral legislatures

Hello, Carrot official. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of unicameral legislatures".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} oder {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 18:34, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:IPhone Calculator.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:IPhone Calculator.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 23:01, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:IPhone Calculator.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:IPhone Calculator.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. AntiCompositeNumber (Ring me) 00:48, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Agriculture in Italy moved to draftspace

This is almost completely unsourced. As in, it's not missing references for a few statements, it's missing references for 99% of all text. Please don't put this into mainspace until sourcing requirements are met. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 21:31, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I realize this notice should not have gone to you but to the editor who created the unreferenced version. Copying there. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 21:33, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Italian football clubs established in 1967

A tag has been placed on Category:Italian football clubs established in 1967 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:05, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:X1/dshjfhjfjhdkfjhdsfjhkdfjfdjhkfdfdhdsfhjdkdfhjklfdhjkdf

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Template:X1/dshjfhjfjhdkfjhdsfjhkdfjfdjhkfdfdhdsfhjdkdfhjklfdhjkdf, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 02:29, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Redirects

Hello, Partofthemachine,

Please review Wikipedia:Redirect#Purposes of redirects. It is not helpful to make a redirect for every possible misspelling of a name. And if there is an article on Alexa Dectis, it makes no sense to create a redirect at Alexa Dectis (actor) because readers will just search for her name, Alexa Dectis, and are unlikely to add "actor" to their search terms. Redirects should be for alternative names & terms that readers might search for, not more complicated versions of their names. Wikipedia:Redirect has a lot of helpful information that will be useful if you choose to spend time on this editing task. You might also visit Redirects for Discussion where editors discuss whether questionable redirects should be kept or deleted. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:58, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Partofthemachine, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:59, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021

Hello, I'm Serial Number 54129. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, it's important to be mindful of the feelings of your fellow editors, who may be frustrated by certain types of interaction, such as your addition to Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:GregJackP/Admin criteria. While you probably didn't intend any offense, please do remember that Wikipedia strives to be an inclusive atmosphere. In light of that, it would be greatly appreciated if you could moderate yourself so as not to offend. Thank you. ——Serial 21:51, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Partofthemachine:, from here on out, stay off of my talk and user pages. GregJackP Boomer! 23:28, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Giannis Nikopolidis

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Giannis Nikopolidis requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Kpg jhp jm 23:13, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Daniel Wu (soccer)

The article Daniel Wu (soccer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTY.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JTtheOG (talk) 00:07, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Daniel Wu (soccer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Daniel Wu (soccer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Wu (soccer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

JTtheOG (talk) 06:57, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ministry of Radio Technology moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Ministry of Radio Technology, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CommanderWaterford (talk) 21:47, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nchalo moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Nchalo, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 00:36, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Ministry of Radio Technology

Hello, Partofthemachine. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ministry of Radio Technology, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:02, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Nchalo

Hello, Partofthemachine. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Nchalo, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:01, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ministry of Radio Technology

Hello, Partofthemachine. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ministry of Radio Technology".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:04, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"The most common language in Mexico" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect The most common language in Mexico. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 October 27#The most common language in Mexico until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Loafiewa (talk) 16:57, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Per UTRS appeal #60827,

will restore Talk Page Access so that user may request unblocking here. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:18, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Block appeal

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Partofthemachine (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

(Note: This is largely copied from a previous appeal that I was not able to post on the talk page.)

I would like to take this opportunity to appeal the indefinite block I was given in April 2021. The reason I was blocked was primarily because of two factors. First, I nominated a largely legitimate user subpage for deletion because I disliked the user that created it. I now recognize that this was immature and a waste of editors' time. Second, I created user pages and user talk pages for new users even though this was not necessary, because those users can create pages of their own. Because it has now been over a year since I was blocked, I request to be unblocked per WP:SO. Partofthemachine (talk) 21:12, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

No objections to giving this user another chance. Graham87 06:43, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You forgot the part from your UTRS ticket where you described what constructive edits you would make. No unblock request is complete without that. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:52, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Again mostly from the UTRS ticket.) I will engage in making mostly the same types of edits that I was making prior to April 2021 (aside from the ones that are considered unconstructive obviously), such as grammar fixes, topics related to programming and mathematics, and AFD discussions. Partofthemachine (talk) 01:57, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Inclined to unblock. @Graham87: What say you. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 06:21, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Yeah I guess there's no harm in giving an unblock a go. Done. Graham87 06:43, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 2022

Hello, I'm LaundryPizza03. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Technobabble, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 10:00, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Buzzfeed News

While buzzfeed.com is not considered reliable, Buzzfeed News is.

Just an FYI. Cheers. Mr. Swordfish (talk) 21:12, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

""I invented email" guy" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect "I invented email" guy and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 5#"I invented email" guy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Clovermoss (talk) 02:07, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Indigenous science

Hello, Partofthemachine, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username Pppery, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Indigenous science, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indigenous science.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Pppery}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

* Pppery * _{it has begun...} 23:23, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rewrite of Indigenous science

Hey @Partofthemachine I just wanted to stop by and let you know that I have made some significant edits to your article. If you have any questions or concerns you're more than welcome to let me know. Dr vulpes ^{(💬 • 📝)} 20:37, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Indigenous science, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Your edits are not helping improve this article. If you want to help improve this article you are more than welcome but some of your recent edits have not been moving it in a useful direction.

For example you removed Karlie Noon from the article saying that she does not promote indigenous science. Maybe you missed the reference in her wikipedia article where she talks about her work research in Indigenous astronomy and weather predictions. That's ok we've all made mistakes, I know I have.

You also removed the links to traditional ecological knowledge and put it in quotes. That's not really helping people connect to additional parts of this area of study. TEK is a big deal if you search Google Scholar for "traditional ecological knowledge" you'll find over 45,000 articles. You replaced Indigenous knowledge with Indigenous beliefs. I am going to assume good faith WP:GOODFAITH and that you didn't make these edits out of malice. Please familiarize yourself with the literature of the subject before making changes. Community knowledge is not a belief, science is not a belief, they are knowledge. Dr vulpes ^{(💬 • 📝)} 05:20, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Dr vulpes: Would you consider it an NPOV violation if the article on Noah's flood referred to it as "traditional Jewish knowledge"? Partofthemachine (talk) 14:28, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @Partofthemachine, I think a better way to frame this isn't as two competing schools of thought. I've linked an article below from the ICSU and UNESCO that I really liked, it had some good examples of the points I was trying to make. Also Neil deGrasse Tyson had a good episode of StarTalk about Indigenous Science. As for here on wikipedia ArbCom has a couple of case that cover Pseudoscience that you might enjoy taking a look at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Pseudoscience (2006) and Clarification request: Pseudoscience (2020).

Since we're working with your example of Noah's flood I thought that some of these articles on flood management might help shed light on how indigenous science complements western science and local policy makers.

International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction

United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs

Integrating indigenous knowledge and scientific methods for flood risk analyses, responses and adaptation in rural coastal communities in Nigeria

International Council for Science and The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization

Science, Traditional Knowledge and Sustainable Development

StarTalk with Neil deGrasse Tyson

Indigenous Science with Neil deGrasse Tyson & Dr. Jessica Hernandez

Hope this helps clear up what I was trying to say. Dr vulpes ^{(💬 • 📝)} 20:07, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in pseudoscience and fringe science. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

* Pppery * _{it has begun...} 13:07, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Leijurv" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Leijurv and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 13#Leijurv until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 20:37, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"My god, what have I done?" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect My god, what have I done? and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 13#My god, what have I done? until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 20:42, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"He can't keep getting away with this" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect He can't keep getting away with this and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 13#He can't keep getting away with this until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 20:45, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Big words" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Big words and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 13#Big words until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 20:46, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"No Server November" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect No Server November and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 22#No Server November until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 15:17, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.

♠PMC♠ (talk) 10:33, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

		Short Description Barnstar
		I know we didn't see eye to eye with the Indigenous science article a couple months back. But after reviewing your edits I got really interested in the short description wikiproject. It has been so much fun! Thanks for introducing this to me and for all the work you put into Wikipedia. Dr vulpes ^{(💬 • 📝)} 08:53, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

PS Look into applying for AutoWikiBrowser privileges, it makes doing these short descriptions at scale a breeze. Dr vulpes ^{(💬 • 📝)} 08:55, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

PA

This is the only message I will leave here. I have very politely asked you to stay off my talk page. That is a perfectly normal request and on Wikipedia it is expected to be respected. I have been around on Wikipedia for a great many years and there are 629 people watching my talk page, there are 24,059 links to it and 2,733 editors have contributed to it. In 16 years you are only the 4th person I have asked to stay away. Take my advice, you have already invited sanctions and you are continuing to step on our policies. Enjoy your editing but do try avoid being a Wiki policeman until you have a lot more experience. Maybe Chris troutman is the person to ask, he's as experienced as I am - perhaps more so. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 03:09, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Partofthemachine, Kudpung is right when he says that the norm on Wikipedia is that when an editor bans you from their talk page, you stay away forever. I, myself, have been banned by two other editors from their talk pages (each about five years ago) and I respect their requests. If you have questions ask me but leave Kudpung out of this. Chris Troutman (talk) 03:51, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know why you think I have an issue with doing that. Another user requested that I avoid his talk page about a year ago and I haven't commented there since. Partofthemachine (talk) 03:56, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last comment I will make about this situation: I don't have anything against Kudpung, and I agree that he was right in discouraging the user in question from starting an RfA. I just think it would have been better if he had just linked to WP:NOTNOW instead of saying he would need to wait 3 years before even thinking about becoming an admin. Partofthemachine (talk) 23:57, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]