Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2022 November 27
 |
For a listing of ongoing discussions, see the dashboard.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 00:10, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
- Benjamin Geller (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Totaly non-notable junior county commissioner. COI issues. Hipocrite (talk) 00:10, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Hipocrite (talk) 00:10, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Yet another resume article for a minor county official just there to get on TV/ rather than actually be a civil servant. Nate • (chatter) 00:16, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 09:24, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, falls short of WP:NPOL, and every other criteria of encyclopedic notability. BD2412 T 00:53, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. County-level officeholders are not "inherently" notable per WP:NPOL — to be notable on that basis, a county commissioner would have to demonstrate a credible reason (e.g. nationalizing coverage) why he could legitimately claim to be one of the most individually important county commissioners in the entire United States, and simply existing as a local officeholder with the purely run of the mill local coverage that's simply expected to exist for local officeholders in their own local media is not enough. Bearcat (talk) 16:15, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 00:10, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
- Liao Wang (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Per WP:NOPROMO and lack of independent establishment of notability based on WP:RS Amigao (talk) 00:01, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, China, and United Arab Emirates. AllyD (talk) 08:19, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
- Delete more crypto fluff. Press releases, flowery pieces and the like for sources. Oaktree b (talk) 00:33, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
- Delete: per WP:NOPROMO and WP:GNG. Concur with @Oaktree b. MurrayGreshler (talk) 21:27, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.