Jump to content

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Taiwan

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 76.68.77.224 (talk) at 22:21, 15 March 2023 (→‎Structure of the ROC/Taiwan parliament: Reply). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

MainDiscussMitgliederRequestsTasksFeaturedRessourcenPortal
WikiProject iconTaiwan Project‑class
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of WikiProject Taiwan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Taiwan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
ProjectThis page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Template:Outline of knowledge coverage WPT


RfC: Taiwan, "country" or "state"

There has been continued discussion and failure to reach consensus on whether Taiwan should be called a "country" or "state" on the Taiwan article: Talk:Taiwan#Taiwan...is_a_country? I've opened an RfC to come to consensus. User:Stephen Balaban - 9:59, 2 May 2020 (UTC)

Input requested

Your input is requested to help resolve a disagreement at Talk:2022 Chinese military exercises around Taiwan#Source removal. Thank you. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 19:10, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Addition of Pe̍h-ōe-jī

Jen KRT (talk · contribs) has been making edits en masse to the romanization of Chinese names, adding Pe̍h-ōe-jī and often Pe̍h-ōe-jī alone. In most of the edits, there seems to be no direct connection between the subject of the article and Minnan, of which POJ is the romanization. According to MOS:CHINESE, Pinyin is the primary representation to be used. The article Pe̍h-ōe-jī also states that outside Taiwan, POJ is rarely used, and that even within Taiwan, it is not the official romanization for Minnan. Therefore, I consider it undue to add POJ to an article's romanizations unless there is a direct connection to it. Also pinging Dawkin Verbier. intforce (talk) 15:03, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, hanyu pinyin should be the main transliteration. This is even more true in contemporary mainland China articles like Xie Hua'an. That article's lead currently only gives POJ (and traditional characters instead of simplified), so that should be changed.
In general it doesn't hurt much to add another transliteration to Infobox Chinese, so if someone finds it useful, I'm inclined to err on the side of allowing POJ in the infobox for Taiwan articles (but hanyu pinyin should always be included too). —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 18:03, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I agree. Allowing it in the infobox doesn't hurt if pinyin is already there, but adding it in the lead sentence leads to unnecessary clutter. The lead sentence should be restricted to pinyin (traditional and/or simplified). intforce (talk) 18:09, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Huang Guo-shu#Requested move 11 January 2023 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. – robertsky (talk) 09:09, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimania 2023 : Singapore, 16-19 August

Wikimedians! You are highly encouraged to apply for travel scholarship for Wikimedia Movement's largest gathering, Wikimania 2023. Wikimania 2023 will happen in Singapore and online from 16-19 August, 2023. There is a pre-conference on the 15th and a post-conference on the 20th. It is back on our region since Hong Kong in 2013. Application deadline is on 5 February 2023 at 23:59 AoE. Regular registration will happen around

Structure of the ROC/Taiwan parliament

There is a discussion at Talk:List_of_legislatures_by_number_of_members#Republic_of_China that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. It revolves around whether the list should reflect the organization as envisioned in the original Constitution of the Republic of China, or after the various Additional Articles of the Constitution of the Republic of China. Recent edits favor the former, on the argument that the latter only result in de facto rather than de jure changes. - RovingPersonalityConstruct (talk, contribs) 21:44, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Go for it. I’ll be ready. 76.68.77.224 (talk) 22:21, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]