R (Privacy International) v Investigatory Powers Tribunal
 | This article is missing information about what the case was about. (September 2021) |
| R (Privacy International) v Investigatory Powers Tribunal | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Court | Supreme Court of the United Kingdom |
| Full case name | R (on the application of Privacy International) v Investigatory Powers Tribunal and others |
| Decided | 15 May 2019 |
| Citations |
|
| Case history | |
| Appealed from | [2017] EWCA Civ 1868 |
R (Privacy International) v Investigatory Powers Tribunal [2019] UKSC 22, is a judgment of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom.
Judgment
Lord Sumption (with whom Lord Reed agreed) and Lord Wilson dissented.[1]
Commentary
Richard Ekins said the ruling "undermines the rule of law and violates the sovereignty of Parliament".[2]
References
Citations
- ^ Scott 2020, p. 108.
- ^ Dawson, Joanna (28 May 2019). "What does the Supreme Court's ruling on the Investigatory Powers Tribunal mean for parliamentary sovereignty?". House of Commons Library. Archived from the original on 25 February 2021. Retrieved 3 September 2021.
Bibliography
- Scott, Paul F. (January 2020). "Once More unto the Breach: R (Privacy International) v Investigatory Powers Tribunal". Edinburgh Law Review. 24 (1): 103–109. doi:10.3366/elr.2020.0605. eISSN 1755-1692. ISSN 1364-9809.
Further reading
- Webb, Thomas E. (2021). "R (on the application of Privacy International) v Investigatory Powers Tribunal [2019] UKSC 22, Supreme Court". Essential Cases: Public Law (4th ed.). Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/he/9780191926440.003.0056. ISBN 978-0-19-192644-0.
- Elliott, Mark; Young, Alison L. (2019). "Privacy International in the Supreme Court: Jurisdiction, the Rule of Law, and Parliamentary Sovereignty". Cambridge Law Journal. 78 (3). Cambridge University Press: 490–496. doi:10.1017/S0008197319000813. eISSN 1469-2139. ISSN 0008-1973. S2CID 210531385.