User talk:Aussie information editor

Welcome!

Hello, Aussie information editor, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Introduction tutorial
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Introduction to referencing
• Help pages
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or . Again, welcome.  JarrahTree 11:01, 24 December 2022 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. - Nick Thorne ^talk 06:47, 5 June 2023 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing Royal Australian Navy for a period of 72 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Daniel Case (talk) 14:46, 5 June 2023 (UTC)

You wrote on my talk page:

I don't exactly understand the issue. I updated the information to reflect to current data and this 'edit war' thing comes up. what are people struggling to understand? Aussie information editor (talk) 05:12, 6 June 2023 (UTC)

I recommend you read and understand Wikipedia's policies about verification and synthesis. You cannot combine information from varying sources or do your own analysis of what the sources say, that is original research. Secondly, when you make a change, and it gets reverted, you are advised to follow the Bold-Revert-Discuss cycle rather than re-revert. Simply re-reverting without engaging in discussion to establish a consensus for the proposed change is by definition edit warring. You had ample opportunity to discuss the matter, but you chose not to. - Nick Thorne ^talk 01:34, 7 June 2023 (UTC)